http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* How Will You All Adapt to $4.00 per gallon gasoline? - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/27e47bb40833e110?hl=en
* Expectations vs reality - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/f7d2ec28a71f317c?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: How Will You All Adapt to $4.00 per gallon gasoline?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/27e47bb40833e110?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 1 2008 8:43 pm
From: max
In article <fqd9s4$u0i$1@registered.motzarella.org>,
"Dave" <noway@nohow.not> wrote:
> > a Prius which averages around 40MPG. Only a fool didn't expect gas
> > prices to climb. After all, the oil industry has a puppet doing their
> > bidding in the White House.
>
> You saying the puppet in the white house is billions of years old? Or
> perhaps you think he's got a time machine? That puppet in the white house
> has no control over the dwindling supply of a non-renewable asset,
> oron. -Dave
that's a very silly thing to say.
The White House can most certainly influence the patterns, rates, and
rates-of-change of use of non-renewable assets.
He may not have absolute control, but he has more than all but maybe 3
or 4 of the 303,500,000 people currently residing in the US.
now, what were you saying about orons?
--
This signature can be appended to your outgoing mesages. Many people include in
their signatures contact information, and perhaps a joke or quotation.
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 1 2008 10:43 pm
From: The_Source
Heya!
> perhaps you think he's got a time machine? That puppet in the white
> house has no control over the dwindling supply of a non-renewable asset,
Dwindling supply? Are you all fools? You mean the supplies that your
President and Vice President are doing their utmost to restrict the
flow of so their own little oil companies don't suffer whilst your
little economy is slowly suffering??
Give me a break!
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 1 2008 10:47 pm
From: "Rod Speed"
max <betatron@earthlink.net> wrote
> Dave <noway@nohow.not> wrote
>>> a Prius which averages around 40MPG. Only a fool didn't expect gas
>>> prices to climb. After all, the oil industry has a puppet doing
>>> their bidding in the White House.
>> You saying the puppet in the white house is billions of years old?
>> Or perhaps you think he's got a time machine? That puppet in the
>> white house has no control over the dwindling supply of a
>> non-renewable asset, moron.
> that's a very silly thing to say.
Nope.
> The White House can most certainly influence the patterns,
> rates, and rates-of-change of use of non-renewable assets.
Nope. In spades world wide.
> He may not have absolute control,
He has no control what so ever.
> but he has more than all but maybe 3 or 4 of the
> 303,500,000 people currently residing in the US.
None of those individuals have any control either except of their own
personal use, and that has no effect whatever on the global usage.
> now, what were you saying about orons?
He obviously saw you coming.
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 1 2008 10:47 pm
From: "Rod Speed"
George Grapman <sfgeorge@paccbell.net> wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>>> a Prius which averages around 40MPG. Only a fool didn't expect gas
>>> prices to climb. After all, the oil industry has a puppet doing
>>> their bidding in the White House.
>>
>> You saying the puppet in the white house is billions of years old? Or perhaps you think he's got a time machine?
>> That puppet in the
>> white house has no control over the dwindling supply of a
>> non-renewable asset, oron. -Dave
> No, but he could jawbone OPEC to lower prices.
In your dreams.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Expectations vs reality
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/f7d2ec28a71f317c?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Mar 1 2008 10:44 pm
From: Coffee's For Closers
In article <srhi-03BFE6.21271029022008@comcast.dca.giganews.com>,
srhi@comcast.net says...
> In article <Rl_xj.36$AL1.31@newsfe06.lga>, Billy <Bob@BillyJoe.Bob>
> wrote:
>
> > They didn't want to look or be perceived as unsophisticated so they
> > pretended the higher priced wine was better.
> > Some may have thought it was better as if the price mad a difference but
> > I doubt it.
> A few years ago, I was really into wine and I attended many wine
> tastings and attended a few courses on wines, such Wines of Italy, Wines
> of Nappa Valley, etc. I tend to go for the lower priced wines, and
> fairly young vintages.
I like Thunderbird. Vintage a couple months ago. It has a
complex bouquet of both apples and antifreeze.
--
Get Credit Where Credit Is Due
http://www.cardreport.com/
Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment