Wednesday, September 28, 2011

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 7 new messages in 2 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Apple vs. Samsung War - 5 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/4764efd61ae513fe?hl=en
* A Failed Experiment - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/f3bd0d3c714e561f?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Apple vs. Samsung War
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/4764efd61ae513fe?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Mon, Sep 26 2011 11:00 pm
From: "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds"


In article <9ed18qF4kkU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:


> >>>> I doubt it. I doubt Apple can sustain their initial win anywhere much
> >>>> that matters.
>
> >>> unless they buy Samsung,
>
> >> Not a chance.
>
> > always a chance,
>
> Nope, not with a Korean company there isnt.

No such thing. It's a world economy, don't you know that?


>
> > but all they really need to do is buy 10% of Samsungs stock
>
> Pity it aint that easy.

Oh, stock markets don't work south of the equator?


>
> > and that would get them a seat on the Board of Directors,
>
> Doesnt work like that in Korea.

corporations all work the same way


>
> > which not only means any suits are less likely,
>
> Fantasy.

which is your specialty


>
> > but that instead of competition, Samsung becomes more of a supplier
>
> Even sillier. Apple gets their stuff made in China for a reason.

and where does Samsung get their stuff made?

> > and you apparently have no idea of Apples cash reserves/credit rating
>
> Nothing like enough to buy an operation like Samsung.

Because Apple isn't the most highly capitalized company in the world?


>
> > nor do you have any idea of how Apple views a competitor
>
> How Apple views them is completely irrelevant.

how you view them is irrelevant because you couldn't afford to buy enough apple
stock to make a difference. how apple views them is the whole point of my
conjecture


>
> > that they might well purchase
>
> Pure pig ignorant fantasy.

Yes, that is your style


>
> > and then sell off those operations they don't need,
>
> Not a chance. Who are they going to sell them to ?

anyone that is in the armaments industry. anyone that is in the home appliance
industry...in other words, anyone that competes with them

>
> > unless they intend to get into the Armaments Industry
>
> Not a chance. It isnt even legal for an american company to do that in Korea.

which is why god created corporate lawyers and man created huge piles of cash


>
> > and that might very well make those Armaments more dependable
>
> Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasys.

you don't have to keep reminding us of your failings


--

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras lobortis volutpat
commodo. Morbi lobortis, massa fringilla adipiscing suscipit, velit urna
pharetra neque, non luctus arcu diam vitae justo. Vivamus lacinia scelerisque
ultricies. Nunc lobortis elit ligula. Aliquam sollicitudin nunc sed est gravida
ac viverra tellus ullamcorper. Vivamus non nisi suscipit nisi egestas
venenatis. Donec vitae arcu id urna euismod feugiat. Vivamus porta lobortis
ultricies. Nulla adipiscing tellus a neque vehicula porta. Maecenas volutpat
aliquet sagittis. Proin nisi magna, molestie id volutpat in, tincidunt sed
dolor. Nullam nisi erat, aliquet scelerisque sagittis vitae, pretium accumsan
odio. Sed ut mi iaculis eros rutrum tristique ut nec mi. Aliquam nec augue dui,
in mattis urna. In pretium metus eu diam blandit accumsan. Ut eu lorem sed odio
porttitor blandit.


--

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras lobortis volutpat
commodo. Morbi lobortis, massa fringilla adipiscing suscipit, velit urna
pharetra neque, non luctus arcu diam vitae justo. Vivamus lacinia scelerisque
ultricies. Nunc lobortis elit ligula. Aliquam sollicitudin nunc sed est gravida
ac viverra tellus ullamcorper. Vivamus non nisi suscipit nisi egestas venenatis.
Donec vitae arcu id urna euismod feugiat. Vivamus porta lobortis ultricies.
Nulla adipiscing tellus a neque vehicula porta. Maecenas volutpat aliquet
sagittis. Proin nisi magna, molestie id volutpat in, tincidunt sed dolor. Nullam
nisi erat, aliquet scelerisque sagittis vitae, pretium accumsan odio. Sed ut mi
iaculis eros rutrum tristique ut nec mi. Aliquam nec augue dui, in mattis urna.
In pretium metus eu diam blandit accumsan. Ut eu lorem sed odio porttitor
blandit.


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 12:18 am
From: "Rod Speed"


Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>>> I doubt it. I doubt Apple can sustain their initial win anywhere much that matters.

>>>>> unless they buy Samsung,

>>>> Not a chance.

>>> always a chance,

>> Nope, not with a Korean company there isnt.

> No such thing.

Wrong with buying out Samsung.

> It's a world economy,

Wrong with buying out Samsung. Its Korean law that decides if that is even possible.

>>> but all they really need to do is buy 10% of Samsungs stock

>> Pity it aint that easy.

> Oh, stock markets don't work south of the equator?

They couldnt even buy 10% of Samsung's stock.

>>> and that would get them a seat on the Board of Directors,

>> Doesnt work like that in Korea.

> corporations all work the same way

Like hell they do on that. 10% of Samsung stock
doesnt get you a seat on the board, fool.

>>> which not only means any suits are less likely,

>> Fantasy.

> which is your specialty

Everyone can see for themselves that it is yours.

You dont have a fucking clue how the Korean
system works, or about anything else at all, either.

>>> but that instead of competition, Samsung becomes more of a supplier

>> Even sillier. Apple gets their stuff made in China for a reason.

> and where does Samsung get their stuff made?

In Korea, fool.

>>> and you apparently have no idea of Apples cash reserves/credit rating

>> Nothing like enough to buy an operation like Samsung.

> Because Apple isn't the most highly capitalized company in the world?

That is a pig ignorant lie. Samsung alone is MUCH bigger.

>>> nor do you have any idea of how Apple views a competitor

>> How Apple views them is completely irrelevant.

> how you view them is irrelevant because you couldn't
> afford to buy enough apple stock to make a difference.
> how apple views them is the whole point of my conjecture

But you are so pig ignorant that you cant even manage to grasp
that Apple cant buy enough Samsung stock to have any effect
what so ever on what they do, let alone buy them out.

>>> that they might well purchase

>> Pure pig ignorant fantasy.

> Yes, that is your style

Everyone can see for themselves that its yours.

>>> and then sell off those operations they don't need,

>> Not a chance. Who are they going to sell them to ?

> anyone that is in the armaments industry.

Not even legally possible.

> anyone that is in the home appliance industry...
> in other words, anyone that competes with them

Fuck all of whom have anywhere near the
capacity to do that, even when its legal.

>>> unless they intend to get into the Armaments Industry

>> Not a chance. It isnt even legal for an american company to do that in Korea.

> which is why god created corporate lawyers

And Korea just makes an obscene gesture in their general direction
and carrys on regardless.

> and man created huge piles of cash

Apple aint got enough of that to buy Samsung, even if that was legal, and it aint.

>>> and that might very well make those Armaments more dependable

>> Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasys.

> you don't have to keep reminding us of your failings

Everyone can see for themselves that its yours.


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 4:35 pm
From: "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds"


In article <9edbluFhlqU1@mid.individual.net>,
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

> > No such thing.
>
> Wrong with buying out Samsung.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> > It's a world economy,
>
> Wrong with buying out Samsung. Its Korean law that decides if that is even
> possible.

Yet it's possible for non-koreans to buy stock of Samsung, isn't it?

> > Oh, stock markets don't work south of the equator?
>
> They couldnt even buy 10% of Samsung's stock.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> >>> and that would get them a seat on the Board of Directors,
>
> >> Doesnt work like that in Korea.
>
> > corporations all work the same way
>
> Like hell they do on that. 10% of Samsung stock doesnt get you a seat on the
> board, fool.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> >>> which not only means any suits are less likely,
>
> >> Fantasy.
>
> > which is your specialty
>
> Everyone can see for themselves that it is yours.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> You dont have a fucking clue how the Korean system works, or about anything
> else at all, either.

And you are an expert?

> >>> but that instead of competition, Samsung becomes more of a supplier
>
> >> Even sillier. Apple gets their stuff made in China for a reason.
>
> > and where does Samsung get their stuff made?
>
> In Korea, fool.

So what you are saying is that if Apple bought Samsung, they could diversify
the manufacture of their product line and/or put pressure on those Chinese
manufacturers for lower prices all the while eliminating competition from
Samsung smart phones?

> >>> and you apparently have no idea of Apples cash reserves/credit rating
>
> >> Nothing like enough to buy an operation like Samsung.
>
> > Because Apple isn't the most highly capitalized company in the world?
>
> That is a pig ignorant lie. Samsung alone is MUCH bigger.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> >>> nor do you have any idea of how Apple views a competitor
>
> >> How Apple views them is completely irrelevant.
>
> > how you view them is irrelevant because you couldn't afford to buy enough
> > apple stock to make a difference. how apple views them is the whole point
> > of my conjecture
>
> But you are so pig ignorant that you cant even manage to grasp that Apple
> cant buy enough Samsung stock to have any effect what so ever on what they
> do, let alone buy them out.

And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> >>> that they might well purchase
>
> >> Pure pig ignorant fantasy.
>
> > Yes, that is your style
>
> Everyone can see for themselves that its yours.

don't demean yourself, let others do it for you

> >>> and then sell off those operations they don't need,
>
> >> Not a chance. Who are they going to sell them to ?
>
> > anyone that is in the armaments industry.
>
> Not even legally possible.

So companies in the armaments industry cannot buy companies in the armaments
industry? And your proof is: oh wait, the great rod speed doesn't do proof

> > anyone that is in the home appliance industry... in other words, anyone
> > that competes with them
>
> Fuck all of whom have anywhere near the capacity to do that, even when its
> legal.

wtf does that mean? want to try again in English

> >>> unless they intend to get into the Armaments Industry
>
> >> Not a chance. It isnt even legal for an american company to do that in
> >> Korea.
>
> > which is why god created corporate lawyers
>
> And Korea just makes an obscene gesture in their general direction and carrys
> on regardless.
>
> > and man created huge piles of cash
>
> Apple aint got enough of that to buy Samsung, even if that was legal, and it
> aint.

Pure pig ignorant fantasy

> >>> and that might very well make those Armaments more dependable
>
> >> Just another of your pathetic little pig ignorant fantasys.
>
> > you don't have to keep reminding us of your failings
>
> Everyone can see for themselves that its yours.

Pure pig ignorant fantasy

--

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras lobortis volutpat
commodo. Morbi lobortis, massa fringilla adipiscing suscipit, velit urna
pharetra neque, non luctus arcu diam vitae justo. Vivamus lacinia scelerisque
ultricies. Nunc lobortis elit ligula. Aliquam sollicitudin nunc sed est gravida
ac viverra tellus ullamcorper. Vivamus non nisi suscipit nisi egestas venenatis.
Donec vitae arcu id urna euismod feugiat. Vivamus porta lobortis ultricies.
Nulla adipiscing tellus a neque vehicula porta. Maecenas volutpat aliquet
sagittis. Proin nisi magna, molestie id volutpat in, tincidunt sed dolor. Nullam
nisi erat, aliquet scelerisque sagittis vitae, pretium accumsan odio. Sed ut mi
iaculis eros rutrum tristique ut nec mi. Aliquam nec augue dui, in mattis urna.
In pretium metus eu diam blandit accumsan. Ut eu lorem sed odio porttitor
blandit.

--

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras lobortis volutpat
commodo. Morbi lobortis, massa fringilla adipiscing suscipit, velit urna
pharetra neque, non luctus arcu diam vitae justo. Vivamus lacinia scelerisque
ultricies. Nunc lobortis elit ligula. Aliquam sollicitudin nunc sed est gravida
ac viverra tellus ullamcorper. Vivamus non nisi suscipit nisi egestas venenatis.
Donec vitae arcu id urna euismod feugiat. Vivamus porta lobortis ultricies.
Nulla adipiscing tellus a neque vehicula porta. Maecenas volutpat aliquet
sagittis. Proin nisi magna, molestie id volutpat in, tincidunt sed dolor. Nullam
nisi erat, aliquet scelerisque sagittis vitae, pretium accumsan odio. Sed ut mi
iaculis eros rutrum tristique ut nec mi. Aliquam nec augue dui, in mattis urna.
In pretium metus eu diam blandit accumsan. Ut eu lorem sed odio porttitor
blandit.

--

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras lobortis volutpat
commodo. Morbi lobortis, massa fringilla adipiscing suscipit, velit urna
pharetra neque, non luctus arcu diam vitae justo. Vivamus lacinia scelerisque
ultricies. Nunc lobortis elit ligula. Aliquam sollicitudin nunc sed est gravida
ac viverra tellus ullamcorper. Vivamus non nisi suscipit nisi egestas venenatis.
Donec vitae arcu id urna euismod feugiat. Vivamus porta lobortis ultricies.
Nulla adipiscing tellus a neque vehicula porta. Maecenas volutpat aliquet
sagittis. Proin nisi magna, molestie id volutpat in, tincidunt sed dolor. Nullam
nisi erat, aliquet scelerisque sagittis vitae, pretium accumsan odio. Sed ut mi
iaculis eros rutrum tristique ut nec mi. Aliquam nec augue dui, in mattis urna.
In pretium metus eu diam blandit accumsan. Ut eu lorem sed odio porttitor
blandit.


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 5:57 pm
From: "Rod Speed"


Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote just the puerile shit it always end
up with when its got done like a fucking dinner, as it always is.


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 8:44 pm
From: "Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds"


I knew you could never present proof

..

==============================================================================
TOPIC: A Failed Experiment
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/f3bd0d3c714e561f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 5:52 pm
From: Derald

I determined to find how much of George Jones I could hear before beginning to
drink whisky but I lost track of time. I really don't thing the whisy hd
anything to do with oit" Just fck a bunch of scienc, anywy.
--
Derald


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Tues, Sep 27 2011 11:24 pm
From: The Real Bev


On 09/27/2011 05:52 PM, Derald wrote:

>
> I determined to find how much of George Jones I could hear before beginning to
> drink whisky but I lost track of time. I really don't thing the whisy hd
> anything to do with oit" Just fck a bunch of scienc, anywy.

I guess this means that the whiskey isn't workin' any more.

--
Cheers, Bev
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"It doesn't get any easier - you just go faster."
-- Greg Lemond

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

No comments: