http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* The Nation of Aztlan calls for the removal of whites from North America - 4
messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/1d157a202de4cc43?hl=en
* clean with magazine sheets but not newspaper? - 4 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/605f8bf78d50bdbb?hl=en
* Do Christians Fart in Church? - 5 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/fbacf9e44e40d686?hl=en
* IDIOTS Fail to Read Article They Posted - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/40e3c843ab1f9611?hl=en
* Use a PC monitor with a Blue Ray player? - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b10e2e7d52880350?hl=en
* See London Girls Sex Videos. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/ba39bb1f3336137c?hl=en
* HD Radio - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/bfc50af5d664d4cc?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Nation of Aztlan calls for the removal of whites from North America
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/1d157a202de4cc43?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 9:10 am
From: gb
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 00:31:27 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:08:12 -0700, gb <gb@amusenet.com> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:03:36 -0700, Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Asian Indians are not white, but a polyglot mixture of Indo/Persian
>>>middle eastern stock.
>>
>>That stock is Caucasian, as defined.
>
>As defined by fellow retards?
>
>Yes..I imagine so.
Clearly you Imagine much. But the Indo/Persian group remains Caucasian
withal.
Anthropology Of or being a human racial classification distinguished
especially by very light to brown skin pigmentation and straight to
wavy or curly hair, and including peoples indigenous to Europe,
northern Africa, western Asia, and India.
...
In scientific racism, the term Caucasian race (or Caucasoid, sometimes
also Europid, or Europoid[1]) has been used to denote the general
physical type of some or all of the indigenous human populations of
Europe, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, West Asia, Central Asia, and
South Asia.[2][3]
In common use in American English, the term "Caucasian" (rarely
supplemented with "race") is sometimes restricted to Europeans and
other lighter-skinned populations within these areas, and may be
considered equivalent to the varying definitions of white people. The
term continues to be widely used in many scientific and general
contexts, usually with its more restricted sense of "white",
specifically White American in a US context.
...
So much for mere usage -- which does tend to vary.
As to whether or not the term has any current valid Scientific meaning
at all (along with other alleged "racial" descriptors, that is), the
debate is On:
http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/chapter_7.htm
Today The American Anthropological Association declares there is no
such thing as race which is merely a "social construct." If that is
the new scientific principle, then….There are plenty of scientific
facts to back up this principle. ..."
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 2:39 pm
From: Gunner Asch
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:29:00 -0500, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
wrote:
>In article <kn2t46p9hbdg8r4rri4j59t90ej6tgrms5@4ax.com>,
> Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Phewww!
>>
>> Air freshner, asle 3!!
>
>Yer supposed to be at the door greeting people, ya old fart! Learn yer
>job.
Why..and deprive you of your job?
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 2:40 pm
From: Gunner Asch
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:26:26 -0500, John Stafford <nhoj@droffats.ten>
wrote:
>In article <4r2t46ljquakmtvl1rfroblifopmerj75k@4ax.com>,
> Gunner Asch <gunnerasch@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Indeed. At the period of time when current day Conservatives were called
>> Liberal..and modern day Liberals were called Conservative
>
>When all else fails, Gunner rewrites history.
>
>You are confused. In the early 20th century the Republicans were also
>nominally conservationists (in today's sense and don't confuse that with
>'conservatism'): that trend has reversed. It does not imply that somehow
>there was a massive, universal political role reversal.
You didnt read the link that I provided, while you were puckered up in
Denial, did you....
Pity
Gunner
One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
Gunner Asch
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 11:10 pm
From: slide trombone
On Jul 27, 12:23 am, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:49:17 -0700 (PDT), Curt <obadiahly...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Jul 26, 1:20 pm, Gunner Asch <gunnera...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> One could not be a successful Leftwinger without realizing that,
> >> in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers
> >> and mothers of Leftwingers, a goodly number of Leftwingers are
> >> not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.
> >> Gunner Asch
>
> >Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it
> >is true that most stupid people are conservative.
> >John Stuart Mill
>
> >Curt
>
> You do know that the terms "liberal/conservative" were reversed in the
> early 20th century, are you not?
No he doesn't know. A college educated person no doubt taught him
incorrectly.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: clean with magazine sheets but not newspaper?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/605f8bf78d50bdbb?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 10:06 am
From: "Spamlet"
"john hamilton" <bluestar95@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:i2midd$r35$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but
> not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers
> or the television guide magazines.
>
> I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the
> magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use
> newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food?
> Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is
> also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food
> surfaces and clean windows etc.
>
> Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done
> differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any
> advice.
I think you only need to use your nose: though with widespread colour the
line between magazine and newspaper is increasingly blurred. Most magazines
smell horrible, and many give me a headache, therefore the ink isn't dry,
and you don't want it in your food. (Some may be done on photocopiers, but
even cured plastic toner can transfer on to say over head projector slides
if you leave them stacked together too long.) I'm a bit out of date but
one of the more headachy solvents I used to hate and smell in magazines was
cyclohexanone. There are large numbers of inks and formulations as there is
still a touch of alchemy involved. Many magazines still have ink that
doesn't dry completely and you can quite often get a reversed image if you
insert a piece of plastic and weigh it down for a while. You probably don't
smudge it because most of the time your fingers are on the border of a
magazine whereas you tend to touch the ink when you are folding the
newspaper to read it.
Shiny magazine paper is a pain to anyone who likes to make notes in margins
etc. as biro smudges all over the place and pencil either won't write on it
or rips it to pieces.
Years ago they did feature non dirty newspaper ink in Tomorrow's World.
Like everything else in that prog, it never caught on.
S
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 12:42 pm
From: harry
On 27 July, 13:11, "john hamilton" <bluesta...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands, but
> not after reading the magazine supplements that come inside the newspapers
> or the television guide magazines.
>
> I wondering what the significance is with regard to using sheets from the
> magazines with regard to wrapping food. I know you are not suppose to use
> newspaper. But is it alright to use the magazine sheets for wrapping food?
> Also are they both alright to use in garden composting? This question is
> also relevant when using dampened magazine sheets to clean down food
> surfaces and clean windows etc.
>
> Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done
> differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any
> advice.
Newspaper is made almost entirely out of bleached wood fibres and
won't take a sharp image.
Magazine paper has a high proportion of china clay in it which give
the smoother finish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coated_paper
Traditionally at least newspaper ink had traces of antimony and lead
from the type metal. (poisonous)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_metal
I think this is why they gave up wrapping fish & chips in newspaper!
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 4:22 pm
From: Matty F
On Jul 28, 12:11 am, "john hamilton" <bluesta...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> After reading our newspapers we end up with an oily dirt on our hands,
When I were a lad, my mother used to make our sandwiches on newspaper.
I was sometimes able to read the writing on my sandwiches by using a
mirror!
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 8:10 pm
From: Mark Thorson
john hamilton wrote:
>
> Would anyone know how to explain simply how the method of printing is done
> differently between the magazines and the newspapers? Thanks for any
> advice.
The paper is much different. Glossy magazine paper
is filled with kaolin (a mineral) and casein (protein
from milk) as sizing and surface treatment. The printing
process is also much different, with many more steps
for a magazine page. For example, when there is both
a glossy and a dull surface texture on the same page,
that means they've done an extra pass to print a layer
of shellac. Magazine papers may also have odorant
additives. I would not use those papers for anything.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Do Christians Fart in Church?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/fbacf9e44e40d686?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 11:41 am
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"
(time for some thought-provoking fun)
When they do it's because the "animal inside" is sending bodily
signals more powerful than their heavenly wishes, and it's time for
meditation...
Why pigs fart? Do pigs have a god, and what he looks like? Why do we
still eat them when they are smarter than dogs? Is farting
contributing to Climate Change more than SUVs? Shouldn't I be riding a
bike to avoid filth? Are pigs really filthier than us? Have you
thought of adopting a pig instead of just another cat or dog?
Whatever you say, don't say I don't give a fart!
-------------------------------------------------------
THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS
"I give a fart about the world"
http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION (when the revolution is
the solution)
== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 2:41 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"
On Jul 27, 4:32 pm, e_space <espace1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> some people dont even need a bad reason to be rude, let alone a good
> one
All you gotta do is stop going to church and, say, go riding a bike.
It doesn't matter if you fart on a bike.
== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 3:00 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"
People have to start thinking outside the box... When they drive an
SUV to church, isn't it passing gasses too?
Do they know why the UK is much lower in gas emissions?
"The United States and the United Kingdom are very similar in their
standards of living, but Britain uses 40 percent less energy. The
World's Laura Lynch looks at why."
http://www.theworld.org/2010/07/27/why-brits-use-less-energy-than-americans/
== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 4:02 pm
From: Forrest Hodge
On 7/27/2010 6:00 PM, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the
Movement of Tantra-Hammock wrote:
>
> People have to start thinking outside the box... When they drive an
> SUV to church, isn't it passing gasses too?
>
> Do they know why the UK is much lower in gas emissions?
>
> "The United States and the United Kingdom are very similar in their
> standards of living, but Britain uses 40 percent less energy. The
> World's Laura Lynch looks at why."
>
> http://www.theworld.org/2010/07/27/why-brits-use-less-energy-than-americans/
>
Having 5x times the population might have something to do with it....
== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 4:14 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"
On Jul 27, 7:02 pm, Forrest Hodge <f...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/27/2010 6:00 PM, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the
>
> Movement of Tantra-Hammock wrote:
>
> > People have to start thinking outside the box... When they drive an
> > SUV to church, isn't it passing gasses too?
>
> > Do they know why the UK is much lower in gas emissions?
>
> > "The United States and the United Kingdom are very similar in their
> > standards of living, but Britain uses 40 percent less energy. The
> > World's Laura Lynch looks at why."
>
> >http://www.theworld.org/2010/07/27/why-brits-use-less-energy-than-ame...
>
> Having 5x times the population might have something to do with it....
This is per capita. It has to with land availability AND rational
policies. They put a cap on London's growth in the '30, and here in
Miami we keep expanding into the Everglades, breaking our own zoning
regulations, even though our density is very, very low.
The program is very interesting. People there actually try to get
alone, not kill each other. NYC is not that different though.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: IDIOTS Fail to Read Article They Posted
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/40e3c843ab1f9611?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 12:19 pm
From: Lady Veteran
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:45:07 -0400, Jeff Thies <jeff_thies@att.net>
wrote:
>Lady Veteran wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:55:33 -0400, "h" <tmclone@searchmachine.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Checkmate" <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> wrote in message
>>> news:MPG.26b7b61c3c4ac382989fe5@news.alt.net...
>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>> Checkmate. Oh, yeah... Veronica says I should also mention that Penny
>>>> said the
>>>> following:
>>>>> http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/38414189/ns/today-todaytravel/
>>>>>
>>
>>>>> The woman, a petite 5-foot-4, 110 pounds, said she was flying standby
>>
>> She was flying standby
>>
>>>>> When she was told her seat was needed because a late-arriving passenger?s
>>>>> girth was too wide for just one, she had some questions.
>>
>> This passenger had already purchased two seats.
>
>No. That is wrong.
>
>Southwest generally requires large passengers to buy two tickets. But in
>this case, the child's parents had purchased only one.
>
>http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20011748-10391704.html
>
>No doubt, that is where the problem arose.
>
>Myself, I'm not thinking too well of the obese traveling. I got pinned
>into my seat recently by a fatty who took the adjacent seat and part of
>mine.
>
> Jeff
>>
>>>> Only 14, and already a fat slob... disgusting.
>>
>> Yes you are. You know NOTHING about this person.
>>
>> I am glad you are a COWARD in real life. I would not want to hear your
>> whining.
>>
>> LV
>>
So the fat should not travel? I think that buying two seats is more
than a decent solution to the problem. The responsible fat person will
buy two seats or travel first class where the seats are bigger.
Those who don't should be bumped. However this is for the EXTREMELY
fat person, not someone who just looks that way.
LV
--
"I rode a tank and held a general's rank
When the blitzkrieg raged and the bodies stank."
---Sympathy for the Devil-The Rolling Stones
--------------------------------------------
"Some people are only alive because it is
illegal to kill them."
---Anonymous
----------------------------------------------
See the latest idiot featured on my blog!
My Blog http://ladyveteranslog.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------
"I am really enjoying the new Martin Luther King Jr
stamp - just think about all those white bigots,
licking the backside of a black man."
----Dick Gregory
-----------------------------------------------
Are you being harassed on Usenet and want to fight
back instead of leaving the net? Are you willing to
stand up to Internet bullies and stalkers?
Join my group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiCHU
----------------------------------------------
Today's Idiot - Dan Rather: "And now the sequence of
events in no particular order."
----------------------------------------------
== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 8:01 pm
From: "SteveHorn[Caduceus]ForgingAsGrosvenor"
MSNBC: Petite woman bumped from plane for hefty passenger
Most sensible airlines, REFUSE TO ALLOW late-arrivibg passengers to board -
usually 20 minutes before taking off.
In other wordsd, lardbuckets should not have been allowed boarding, let alone
forcing an already boarded passengerr out of her seat.
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:43:21 -0400, Kurt Ullman <kurtullman@yahoo.com> wrote:
>In article <MPG.26b7b61c3c4ac382989fe5@news.alt.net>,
> Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> wrote:
>> Only 14, and already a fat slob... disgusting. Also, if the passenger was late
>> enough that they reassigned her seat to a standby passenger, that decision
>> should have been irreversible. If you can't get there on time, that's on
>> you.
> Yeah but since he seemed to be flying alone, I am sure that SW did not
>want the liability associated with keeping an eye on the 14 y/o (let
>alone the cost of feeding him) until the next flight.
== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 8:30 pm
From: Jeff Thies
Lady Veteran wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 10:45:07 -0400, Jeff Thies <jeff_thies@att.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Lady Veteran wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:55:33 -0400, "h" <tmclone@searchmachine.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Checkmate" <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> wrote in message
>>>> news:MPG.26b7b61c3c4ac382989fe5@news.alt.net...
>>>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>>>> Checkmate. Oh, yeah... Veronica says I should also mention that Penny
>>>>> said the
>>>>> following:
>>>>>> http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/38414189/ns/today-todaytravel/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The woman, a petite 5-foot-4, 110 pounds, said she was flying standby
>>> She was flying standby
>>>
>>>>>> When she was told her seat was needed because a late-arriving passenger?s
>>>>>> girth was too wide for just one, she had some questions.
>>> This passenger had already purchased two seats.
>> No. That is wrong.
>>
>> Southwest generally requires large passengers to buy two tickets. But in
>> this case, the child's parents had purchased only one.
>>
>> http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20011748-10391704.html
>>
>> No doubt, that is where the problem arose.
>>
>> Myself, I'm not thinking too well of the obese traveling. I got pinned
>> into my seat recently by a fatty who took the adjacent seat and part of
>> mine.
>>
>> Jeff
>>>>> Only 14, and already a fat slob... disgusting.
>>> Yes you are. You know NOTHING about this person.
>>>
>>> I am glad you are a COWARD in real life. I would not want to hear your
>>> whining.
>>>
>>> LV
>>>
> So the fat should not travel? I think that buying two seats is more
> than a decent solution to the problem. The responsible fat person will
> buy two seats or travel first class where the seats are bigger.
>
> Those who don't should be bumped. However this is for the EXTREMELY
> fat person, not someone who just looks that way.
I have no problem whatsoever for anyone who buys two seats. I have a
problem when they take up more than one, when they are only entitled to one.
This kid only bought one seat. Not his/her fault, but the parents who
no doubt were trying to save money. Perhaps they did not even know she
would need two. It's all rather complex with a young girl traveling
alone, stewardesses who are uninformative, and a customer who just
doesn't want to me jerked around. In an environment where the airline
has been harshly criticized for doing the opposite. We don't even know
how fat this girl is.
To make a blanket assumption on right and wrong in this case, I find
to be too republican for my taste.
Jeff
>
> LV
>
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Use a PC monitor with a Blue Ray player?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b10e2e7d52880350?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 2:44 pm
From: "Rod Speed"
me@privacy.net wrote:
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> I live in an area with NO TV SIGNAL
>> You sure that that is permanent with the change to digital TV ?
> My current apartment is down in a "hole" and id have to
> put a tower up with antenna on it which I'm not
> doing...so in essence I have no signal
You sure no one gets digital TV in your area without a tower ?
I find that VERY hard to believe.
Digital TV is very different to analog TV.
== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 11:22 pm
From: Gordon
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in news:8b929qF4a0U1
@mid.individual.net:
> me@privacy.net wrote:
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> I live in an area with NO TV SIGNAL
>
>>> You sure that that is permanent with the change to digital TV ?
>
>> My current apartment is down in a "hole" and id have to
>> put a tower up with antenna on it which I'm not
>> doing...so in essence I have no signal
>
> You sure no one gets digital TV in your area without a tower ?
>
> I find that VERY hard to believe.
>
> Digital TV is very different to analog TV.
>
>
>
The RF signal still propagates the same way.
== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 11:36 pm
From: Shawn Hirn
In article <t7tt46l3gugekh9628sncmtjt60qku26k2@4ax.com>, me@privacy.net
wrote:
> "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> I live in an area with NO TV SIGNAL
> >
> >You sure that that is permanent with the change to digital TV ?
>
> My current apartment is down in a "hole" and id have to
> put a tower up with antenna on it which I'm not
> doing...so in essence I have no signal
Why not http://hulu.com ?
== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 11:54 pm
From: "Rod Speed"
Gordon wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> me@privacy.net wrote:
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>>> I live in an area with NO TV SIGNAL
>>>> You sure that that is permanent with the change to digital TV ?
>>> My current apartment is down in a "hole" and id have to
>>> put a tower up with antenna on it which I'm not
>>> doing...so in essence I have no signal
>> You sure no one gets digital TV in your area without a tower ?
>> I find that VERY hard to believe.
>> Digital TV is very different to analog TV.
> The RF signal still propagates the same way.
Wrong, you dont get ghosts for starters.
And it works a lot better in weak signal areas too.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: See London Girls Sex Videos.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/ba39bb1f3336137c?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 9:07 pm
From: Hot sex
See London Girls Sex Videos At http://veryhotguru.co.cc
Due to high sex content, i have hidden the videos in an image. in
that
website on Top Side search box Above click on image and watch
videos in all angles. please don,t tell to anyone.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: HD Radio
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/bfc50af5d664d4cc?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Jul 27 2010 9:58 pm
From: Jeff Thies
Jeff Thies wrote:
> I've heard the hype over HD radio, but so far haven't seen much in the
> way of products. Anyone listening to HD on either a portable or at home,
> and how did you do it?
>
Bought an Isignia NS-HD01. It's the only portable I could find. At Best
Buy, $39, with a USB rechargeable LiIon.
After taking back the first one because the display didn't work,
round 2 is more successful. Some 41 Stations here in Atlanta. Sound is
good, ergonomics OK. Listening to Billie Holiday now...
Jeff
> Jeff
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment