Friday, October 9, 2009

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 26 new messages in 10 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* The Generals must act… - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a872f90eda04c649?hl=en
* "Promote the general welfare of the United States" - doesn't mean what
leftists think - 8 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3f1993b181e2faf4?hl=en
* $$$ The 6 Dollar Investment "PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST" It Really Works! $$
$ - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/1bf83e3207c6acc2?hl=en
* ▶▶▶▶▶ Cheap wholesale Fashion&brand CAP (Aff Cap, Bape Cap, CA Cap, Coogi
Cap, ED Cap, Gucci Cap...) at www.fjrjtrade.com <paypal payment> - 1 messages,
1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b9163c1357e9684d?hl=en
* There is no "right" to health care - 9 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e14cb160c2e4a0dd?hl=en
* the Price of Marijuana to come down. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/49f81ea069abe782?hl=en
* ╰☆╮Hot╰☆╮Minimum order is one,factory price also! Paypal payment free
shipping!!!!!<www.dotradenow.com> - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/eee16b04e6497b47?hl=en
* cheap property in WV,KY,NC,TN? want to build unrestricted - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3a7cd02ab7dfe59e?hl=en
* The Rich seek "External Validation" - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/258c06a87b64aefb?hl=en
* Mens Leather Coat - size 46 - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a6f609a1d17fae32?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Generals must act…
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a872f90eda04c649?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:27 am
From: martin


On Oct 7, 5:42 pm, Cicero Venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The Generals swear to uphold the Constitution, not swearing allegiance
> to a President.  If the Generals determine that the President is
> undermining the Constitution they have not a right but a duty to remove
> him from office.  General Petraeus and Dick Cheney can get this country
> back on track.  The absolute refusal, by Democrats, to jump start this
> economy with tax cuts for small business is killing the job market for
> decades to come.  These tax cuts should have been enacted weeks after
> Obama's inaugural, but now we learn that the Democrats will never enact
> tax cuts due to their ideology.  The Democrats plan is to slowly
> transition the middle class from an unemployment check to a welfare
> check.  There is no plan for jobs, because the health care will cause a
> second wave of unemployment for those who escaped the axe in the first
> wave.  And now Nancy Pelosi is talking about a VAT tax, which is a
> mammoth middle class tax, which will put the final nail in the Democrats
> failing economy.
>
> The Generals must act quickly, the longer they wait the more precarious
> the average citizen's future becomes.

Has it come to this?

tt


==============================================================================
TOPIC: "Promote the general welfare of the United States" - doesn't mean what
leftists think
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3f1993b181e2faf4?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:40 am
From: Gogarty


In article <ca-dnSOlNMkdxFLXnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kvisions@live.con
says...
>Tater Gumfries wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 12:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>
>> That ain't what the founders said about it.
>
>It is.

The more you carry on the more I think you are jsut pulling someone's chain.

We don't have the president, the Congress or the Supreme Court saying "L'etat,
c'est moi!" It's We, the people. No people. no state.

== 2 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:54 am
From: Patriot Games


On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 01:11:59 -0700 (PDT), IncontinentMcCain
<incontinentmccain@gmail.com> wrote:

To register a complaint with Google regarding the FRAUDULENT use of a
Free Service provided by Google follow these simple instructions:

1) Find the post:

Original:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/0c8b5c0d5be24e6d?hl=en

Or: http://tinyurl.com/db7lqf

2) Click "More Options."

3) Click "Report This Message."

4) Select "Other."

5) Copy and Paste the following into the textbox provided:

This user is FRAUDULENTLY using your Service:

From: yourWorst <graverobber_69@yahoo.com>
From: Apple Crockell <sincerequestioner@gmail.com>
From: "Ice Cream too?" <cake_and_eat_it_too@yahoo.com>
From: Freedom Fighter <i_hate_gwbush@yahoo.com>
From: Hater Of Neocons <haterofneocons@yahoo.com>
From: IncontinentMcCain <incontinentmccain@gmail.com>
From: Parallelism <psyber_operations@yahoo.com>
From: cake_and_eat_it_too@yahoo.com
From: everonlynice@yahoo.com
From: sauteedshrimp@yahoo.com
From: sincerequestioner@gmail.com
From: triba_la_raza@yahoo.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.143.185.23

From: cake_and_eat_it_too@yahoo.com
From: everonlynice@yahoo.com
From: graverobber_69@yahoo.com
From: haterofneocons@yahoo.com
From: i_hate_gwbush@yahoo.com
From: incontinentmccain@gmail.com
From: psyber_operations@yahoo.com
From: sauteedshrimp@yahoo.com
From: sincerequestioner@gmail.com
From: triba_la_raza@yahoo.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 97.82.146.167
97.82.146.167 = Hickory, North Carolina.

6) Click "Report Abuse"

All done!


== 3 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 10:01 am
From: K


IncontinentMcCain wrote:
> On Oct 8, 3:17 pm, "Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names"
> <old_redn...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 8, 3:16 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>
>>> Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>>>> On Oct 8, 2:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>>> Well, no shit.
>>> Then, we are agreed: "promote the general welfare of the United States"
>>> does not imply either a power or a duty to provide health care. Thanks.
>> No.
>>
>> Appears that you are the only dimwit who believes that.
>>
>> Well, maybe you and Glenn Beck.
>>
>> And a couple of chihuahuas.
>
> Re: "Promote the general welfare of the United States" - doesn't mean
> what leftists think. KA&TN? thanks ever so much in joining with me
> in CONTINUING to kick the asses

No. You two pouncing homos haven't kicked anyone's ass.


== 4 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:12 am
From: Beam Me Up Scotty


Gogarty wrote:
> In article
> <0b66b539-0bcc-4de4-b2bf-b1eaf391b9f4@j23g2000vbs.googlegroups.com>,
> Video61@tcq.net says...
>> On Oct 8, 2:30 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-
>> dog.com> wrote:
>>> K wrote:
>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a
> nation.
>>> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
>>> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>>>
>>> The Preamble says "promote" So that kills the idea that it authorizes
>>> government to "give" things to the people.
>>>
>>
>> here is the real truth,
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
>>
>> The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
>> statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
>> Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
>> have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
>> intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
>> would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
>> Confederation).
>>
>> We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
>> Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
>> common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
>> Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
>> establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
>>
>>
>> we the people, to promote, and in the constitution, provide for the
>> general welfare.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
>>> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
>>> the Federal Government.
>>>
>>
>> no, it says for,
>>
>>
>> The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties,
>> Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common
>> Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties,
>> Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
>>
>>
>> the united states is a collective of citizens who all get the same
>> rights issued to them by the constitution. the federal government is
>> here to serve the people. the united states of america is only as
>> strong as its citizens, and the founders knew that full well. and that
>> is what they mean by the general welfare of the united states. we the
>> people, as explained in the preamble.
>>
>>
>>> People have distorted these parts of the constitution to create an
>>> imaginary clause of welfare for the people.
>>>
>> unless of course you have the logic skills to understand the plain
>> language in the constitution, which you do not. if americans are weak,
>> the country is weak.
>>
>>
>>> Look at amendment 10
>>>
>>> Amendment X
>>>
>>> The *powers not delegated to the United States* by the Constitution, nor
>>> prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,
>>> or to the people.
>>>
>> as long as those rights and laws, do not clash with federal law,
>> regulation, or treaty. if they do, then federal law trumps state law.

NO... as long as the Constitution hasn't delegated it to the Federal
Government or someone else.


>> all the 10th says is that states do have some rights, but those
>> rights can be trumped by the supremacy clause. and have been almost

Nothing can cancel out the rights of the people:

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be
construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

>> since day one. you keep whipping a dead horse. its why you are
>> impervious to facts, logic, and reason.
>>
>>
>>> Now tell us what United States means...... It means the United States
>>> Government also known today as the federal government as oppose to State
>>> Government or "the people" of Nation.
>> we the people.
>
> Don't forget that treaties trump Federal law. Treaties are the supreme law of
> the land.


NO treaty can usurp the Constitution. Even if signed in front of God
and everyone, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
--

*BE VERY CONCERNED*

A little liberalism like a little Liquor can be a good thing, but when
Liberalism takes control, it becomes self destructive as does liquor.
-Poetic-Justice-


== 5 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:18 am
From: Beam Me Up Scotty


Gogarty wrote:
> In article <JdqdnSG3ivinWlPXnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kvisions@live.con
> says...
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 1:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>> wilson woods strikes again:) a country is only as healthy as its
>>> citizens.
>> The clause in Article I does not mean to promote any person's individual
>> welfare. It means to promote the welfare of the nation as a political
>> entity. That's what it means.
>
> What is a nation that it should have a life distinct from its citizens whose
> welfare is no concern of the nation?
>


The preamble "suggests" that the government is to "promote" general
welfare..... that is the best we get save for the recognized rights in
the constitution and the fact that government is allowed *only* to
intrude into our life where the Constitution direct the government to
intrude.

We are free, but you seem to think we are subjects of the government.

--

*BE VERY CONCERNED*

Where in the world is the Super Hero, Nobel-Man(Al Gore) he seems to be
hiding


== 6 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:31 am
From: Beam Me Up Scotty


Gogarty wrote:
> In article <ca-dnSOlNMkdxFLXnZ2dnUVZ_qKdnZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kvisions@live.con
> says...
>> Tater Gumfries wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 12:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>> That ain't what the founders said about it.
>> It is.
>
> The more you carry on the more I think you are jsut pulling someone's chain.
>
> We don't have the president, the Congress or the Supreme Court saying "L'etat,
> c'est moi!" It's We, the people. No people. no state.
>
no it's "the people" and when the writers included them selves it
became "we the people" rather than speaking in third person.

Once the constitution creates the Government, it defines the "United
States" the "States" and "The people" as different entities.


"The people" is not redundant for the "United States"


A "United States" is a collection of individual States

== 7 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 12:30 pm
From: Gogarty


In article <4ACF7D2A.4090507@Talk-n-dog.com>,
Then-Destroy-Everything@Talk-n-dog.com says...

>
>NO treaty can usurp the Constitution. Even if signed in front of God
>and everyone, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
>--
Wrong. A treaty becomes the law of the land.

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in
Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the
Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.


== 8 of 8 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 12:52 pm
From: Beam Me Up Scotty


Gogarty wrote:
> In article <4ACF7D2A.4090507@Talk-n-dog.com>,
> Then-Destroy-Everything@Talk-n-dog.com says...
>
>> NO treaty can usurp the Constitution. Even if signed in front of God
>> and everyone, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
>> --
> Wrong. A treaty becomes the law of the land.
>
> This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in
> Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the
> Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the
> Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
> Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
>
>
And you can't make any law that is NOT constitutional. Be they treaties
or what ever.

Thanks for posting the proof.

The authority of the United States, all comes from the Constitution.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: $$$ The 6 Dollar Investment "PUT ME ON YOUR MAILING LIST" It Really
Works! $$$
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/1bf83e3207c6acc2?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:54 am
From: KENNY


All the posts in regard to sending $1 to 6 people do work. Follow the
instructions and be honest. $$ IT WON'T GET ANY EASIER $$


Money Making System $$ Network Together To Make Money Fast!!


I'm sure you've read these letters asking you to send $1 to 6
different addresses.
Putting your home address on the internet can be risky, but through
PayPal all you have to provide is your email address. It's safe and
easy just go to www.paypal.com and set up your
account!!!! I am not a gullible person and have never trusted things
like this, but I gave it a try, hey its only $6, I figured at least 6
people would respond out of the millions of people that use the
internet. You should give it a try too! You have nothing to lose, and
thousands to gain! Read on for the letter that I found...

$$ HOW TO TURN $6 INTO $6,000+!!! THIS REALLY CAN MAKE YOU EASY
MONEY!! IT WORKS!!! BUT YOU HAVE TO FOLLOW IT TO THE LETTER FOR IT TO
WORK!!!! $$


A little while back, I was browsing through newsgroup, just like you
are now and came across an article similar to this that said you could
make thousands dollars within weeks with only an initial investment of
$6.00! So I thought, "Yeah, right, this must be a scam", but like most
of us, I was curious, so I kept reading. Anyway, it said that you send
$1.00 though PayPal to each of the emails stated in the article. You
then place your own email address in the bottom of the list at #6, and
post the article in at least 200 news groups. (There are thousands) No
catch that was it. So after thinking it over, and talking to few
people first, I thought about trying it. I figured what have I got to
lose except $6.00, right? Like most of us I was a little skeptical and
a little worried about the legal aspects of it. It follows the same
regulations as the "mailed chain letters, which according to the U.S.
Post Office (1-800-725-2161) is indeed legal! Then I invested the
measly $6.00. Well GUESS WHAT!!? Within 7 days, I started getting
money in my PayPal account! I was shocked! I figured it would end
soon, but the money just kept coming in. In my first week, I made
about $20.00. By the end second week I had made a total over
$1,200.00!!! In the third week I had over $10,000.00 and it's still
growing. This is now my fourth week and I have made a total of just
over $36,000.00 and it's still coming in rapidly. It's Certainly worth
$6.00. I have spent more than that on the lottery! Let me tell you how
this works and most importantly, why it works? Also, make sure you
print a copy of this article NOW, so you can get the information off
of it as you need it.

$$ REQUIREMENTS: You must have a verified PayPal account. If you do
not have an account you can go to www.paypal.com and follow the
instructions to set up a free account. In order to place the initial
$6 into your account, you will have to verify your bank account with
PayPal (which may take a few days). PayPal is 100% secure and is used
by millions of people world wide.

STEP 1: Send, through PayPal, $1.00 to each email on the below list.
Make the subject of the payment "Email List" and in the comments,
write "PLEASE PUT ME ON YOUR EMAIL LIST." What you are doing is
creating a service by this and best of all you are not giving your
address to anyone you do not know...

THIS IS ABSOLUTELY LEGAL!

The Email List:

1) wksteinhagen@yahoo.com
2) twright101@optonline.net
3) snyders281@comcast.net
4) shashikala.suryavanshi@gmail.com
5) naveen.vasarla@gmail.com
6) frenchk32@gmail.com

MAKE SURE THAT THE EMAILS ARE ENTERED CORRECTLY INTO PAYPAL DURING
PAYMENT

(Copy and paste, and double check)


STEP 2: Now take the #1 email off the list that you see above, move
the other addresses up (6 becomes 5, 5 becomes 4, etc) and add YOUR
email address (the one used on the PayPal account) as number 6 on the
list.

STEP 3: Change anything you need to, but try to keep this article as
close to original as possible. Now, post your amended article to at
least 200 newsgroups, message board. (I think there are close to
32,000 groups) All you need is 200, but remember, the more you post,
the
more money you make - as well as everyone else on the list!

$$ DIRECTIONS $$ HOW TO POST TO NEWSGROUPS + MESSAGE BOARDS $$


Step #1) You do not need to re-type this entire letter to do your own
posting. Simply put your CURSOR at the beginning of this letter and
drag your CURSOR to the bottom of this document, and select 'copy'
from the edit menu. This will copy the entire letter into the computer
memory.


Step #2) Open a blank 'notepad' file and place your cursor at the top
of the blank page. From the 'edit' menu select 'paste'. This will
paste a copy of the letter into notepad so that you can add your name
to the list.


Step #3) save your new notepad file as a .txt file. If you want to do
your postings in different settings, you'll always have this file to
go back to.


Step #4) Use Netscape or Internet Explorer and try searching for
various newsgroups, on-line forums, message boards, bulletin boards,
chat sites, discussions, discussion groups, online communities, etc.
For example: you log on to any search engine like yahoo.com,
google.com, altavista.com, excite.com then you search with subject
like? Millionaire message board? Or ? Money making message board? Or?
Employment message board? Or? Money making discussions? Or? Money
making forum? Or? Business message board? Etc. You will find thousands
& thousands of message boards. Click them one by one then you will
find the option to post a new message.


Step #5) Visits these message boards and post this article as a new
message by highlighting the text of this letter and selecting paste
from the Edit menu. Fill in the Subject, this will be the header that
everyone sees as they scroll thru the list of postings in a particular
group, click the post message button.

You're done with your first one! Congratulations? THAT'S IT!! All you
have to do is jump to different newsgroups and post away, after you
get the hang of it, it will take about 30 seconds for each newsgroup!


$$ REMEMBER, THE MORE NEWSGROUPS AND/OR MESSAGE BOARDS YOU POST IN,
THE MORE MONEY YOU WILL MAKE!! BUT YOU HAVE TO POST A MINIMUM OF 200**

That's it! You will begin receiving money within days! $$


$$ JUST MAKE SURE THE EMAIL YOU SUPPLY IS EXACTLY AS IT APPEARS ON
PAYPAL. $$

Now the WHY part: Out of 200 postings, say I receive only 5 replies (a
very low example).

So then I Made $5.00 with my name at #6 on the letter. Now, each of
the 5 persons who just sent me $1.00 make the MINIMUM 200 postings,
each with my name at #5 and only 5 persons respond to each of the
original 5, that is another $25.00 for me, now those 25 each make 200
MINIMUM posts with my name at #4 and only 5 replies each,

I will bring in an additional $125.00! Now, those 125 persons turn
around and post the MINIMUM 200 with my name at #3 and only receive 5
replies each, I will make an additional $625.00! OK, now here is the
fun part, each of those 625 persons post a MINIMUM 200 letters with my
name at #2 and they only receive 5 replies that just made me
$3,125.00!!!

Those 3,125 persons will all deliver this message to 200 newsgroups
with my name at #1 and if still 5 persons per 200 newsgroups react I
will receive $15,625.00! With an original investment of only $6.00! A
- M - A - Z - I - N - G - $$ $$ When your name is no longer on the
list, you just take latest posting in the newsgroups, and send out
another $6.00 to names on the list, putting your name at number 6
again. And start posting again. The thing to remember is...realizing
thousands of people all over the world are joining the internet and
reading these articles everyday, JUST LIKE YOU are now!! So can you
afford $6?? And see if it really works?? I think so? People have said,
"what if the plan is played out and no one sends you the money?" So
what are the chances of that happening when there are tons of new
honest users and new honest people who are joining the internet and
newsgroups everyday and are willing to give it a try? Estimates are at
20,000 to 50,000 new users, every day, with thousands of those joining
the actual Internet. Remember, play FAIRLY and HONESTLY and this will
work. Seriously, most people think this is a scam, but you actually do
get thousands of dollars out of it, it is NOT another crazy stupid
scam, if people follow through with sending out $6, it works!!!!!


$$ REMEMBER, IT IS 100% LEGAL! DON'T P****THIS UP! $$ Look at what
PayPal had to say about it! (Or ask them for yourself) Dear
************ Thank you for contacting PayPal. We apologize for the
delay in responding to your service request. It has come to our
attention that there is a PayPal scheme floating around at the moment
you may have heard or seen the $5 scheme. You may have even taken part
in it well we have been asked a lot of questions about this scheme the
answer is yes it does work and yes it is safe to use providing you
follow the rules it is legal and has made a big hit on the internet
this year. Thank you for using PayPal! Sincerely, PayPal Community
Support. There's no use trying to cheat for only $6.00 ***


$$ Have fun! $$ Don't forget to visit: https://www.paypal.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: ▶▶▶▶▶ Cheap wholesale Fashion&brand CAP (Aff Cap, Bape Cap, CA Cap,
Coogi Cap, ED Cap, Gucci Cap...) at www.fjrjtrade.com <paypal payment>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b9163c1357e9684d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:58 am
From: fjrjtrade


▶▶▶▶▶ Cheap wholesale Fashion&brand CAP (Aff Cap, Bape Cap, CA Cap,
Coogi Cap, ED Cap, Gucci Cap...) at www.fjrjtrade.com <paypal
payment>


Cheap Wholesale caps

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1455-b0-Cap.html

Cheap Wholesale Caps:

High quality cheap Wholesale A Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1456-b0-A-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale AFF Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1457-b0-Aff-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Bape Baseball Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1459-b0-Bape-Baseball-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale C Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1461-b0-C-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale CA Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1462-b0-CA-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Cincinnati Reds Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1463-b0-Cincinnati-Reds-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Colorado Rockies Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1464-b0-Colorado-Rockies-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Coogi Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1465-b0-Coogi-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale DC Baseball Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1466-b0-DC-Baseball-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Detroit Tigers Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1467-b0-Detroit-Tigers-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale ED Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1468-b0-ED-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale ED Winter hat

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1469-b0-ED-Winter-hat.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Gucci Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1471-b0-Gucci-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Gucci Winter hat

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1472-b0-Gucci-Winter-hat.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Houston Astros Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1473-b0-Houston-Astros-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Jordan Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1474-b0-Jordan-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Kanas City Royals Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1475-b0-Kansas-City-Royals-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale B Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1638-b0-B-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale LA Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1476-b0-LA-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Monster Energy Hats Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2053-b0-Monster-Energy-Hats-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale LV Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1639-b0-LV-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Minnesota Twins Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1477-b0-Minnesota-Twins-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Polo Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1640-b0-POLO-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale NBA Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1478-b0-NBA-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale NEWERA Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1641-b0-NEWERA-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New era1 Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1479-b0-New-era1-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New era1 Leather Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2054-b0-New-Era1-Leather-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New era2 Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1480-b0-New-era2-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New Era1 NY Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2055-b0-New-Era1-NY-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New Era Winter hat

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1481-b0-New-Era-Winter-hat.html

High quality cheap Wholesale New Era Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2056-b0-New-Era-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Oakland Athletics Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1483-b0-Oakland-Athletics-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale P Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1484-b0-P-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Philadelphia Philies Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1485-b0-Philadelphia-Phillies-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Red Bull Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1486-b0-Red-Bull-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale San Diego Padres Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1487-b0-San-Diego-Padres-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Player Version Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2058-b0-Player-Version-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Sf Baseball Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1488-b0-Sf-Baseball-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Smet Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1489-b0-Smet-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Sox Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1490-b0-Sox-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale St Louis Cardinals Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1491-b0-St-Louis-Cardinals-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Superman Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-2057-b0-Superman-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Texas Rangers Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1494-b0-Texas-Rangers-CAP.html

High quality cheap Wholesale Washington Nationals Cap

http://www.fjrjtrade.com/category-1495-b0-Washington-Nationals-CAP.html

Details at website:
http://www.fjrjtrade.com


==============================================================================
TOPIC: There is no "right" to health care
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e14cb160c2e4a0dd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 10:23 am
From: me@privacy.net


K <Kvisions@live.con> wrote:

>You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
>TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner. You don't have a
>"right" to goods or services. If you want goods and services, you must
>pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
>voluntarily. If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.
>
>That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.

And you have no "right" to anything you own cause you
did NOT create it

It is all "on loan" from God and you are just
"borrowing" it

You didn't even create the plant that makes the cotton
that your jeans are made! Nor did you create the
person who sewed them together!

All belongs to God

You don't really "own" anything


== 2 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 10:46 am
From: K


me@privacy.net wrote:
> K <Kvisions@live.con> wrote:
>
>> You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
>> TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner. You don't have a
>> "right" to goods or services. If you want goods and services, you must
>> pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
>> voluntarily. If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.
>>
>> That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.
>
> And you have no "right" to anything you own cause you
> did NOT create it

False. I created the value that I traded to obtain the things I own.
In some few cases - not many - I created the things I own myself. I
have a right to them; no one else has any right to them.

No one has a right to my effort.


== 3 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:10 pm
From: missussex


On Oct 9, 10:46 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:

> >> You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
> >> TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner.  You don't have a
> >> "right" to goods or services.  If you want goods and services, you must
> >> pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
> >> voluntarily.  If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.
>
> >> That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.

No one has the "right" to clean air and water, roads, law enforcement,
and firefighting services either. But all civilized societies provide
these services to their citizens, who pay for it with taxes, because
we all agree it is in the best interest of society.


== 4 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:28 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike


On Oct 9, 9:17 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> In fact, no one has a "right" to any material good or service.  Someone
> might choose to provide some goods and services to deadbeats, but that
> doesn't imply a right to them; and the provider may subsequently decide
> to stop providing them.
>
> You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
> TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner.  You don't have a
> "right" to goods or services.  If you want goods and services, you must
> pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
> voluntarily.  If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.
>
> That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.

Damn straight! You must be some type of Constitutional Law genius.

Why stop at this medical care nonsense? No one has the right to clean
water. If I want to pee in the river, I shouldn't have to care about
those people who live downstream.

And clean air? Where in the constitution does it say I can't open a
lead smelter next door to someone's preschool?

I think my neighbors have no right to complain when I start raising
pigs in my back yard. If they don't like the smell, they should just
shut their damn windows.

I'm tired of the weak and infirmed taking valuable resources. If you
can't get out of bed, we should make all cripples into biodiesel. Lets
cut the BS and do what we want to do and kill all those not fast
enough, smart enough or dare I say, not able to properly camaflauge
themselves in a snowstorm.

They pulled this rights crap when they built the interstate road
system. They said it was for military logistics in order to protect
the country. Now everyone gets on it to take vacations in National
Parks.

WAIT, WAIT!!! I GOT IT!!! The government has only the right to
protect our borders. You with me? OK, so we need to protect the
borders with people who are healthy enough to stand and fight. We give
health care to our men and women in uniform already, but we need to
ensure a steady supply of fodder... er I mean young people to protect
us from hoards of collectivist attackers. So we need to keep our
youngsters healthy; ergo we have a right and a duty to provide health
care to the young.

Next we have to start thinking if the numbers of collectivists
overwhelm our military, it will be up to regular citizens to stand up
to the invasion. Again, we need a healthy population to protect us
from bands of looting Socialists. So giving health care to the general
population is just one more way we can protect our borders.


== 5 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:37 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike


On Oct 9, 10:46 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:

>
> False.  I created the value that I traded to obtain the things I own.
> In some few cases - not many - I created the things I own myself.  I
> have a right to them; no one else has any right to them.
>
> No one has a right to my effort.

Translation: Mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine. Screw you, mine
mine mine mine.

Solution: remedial preschool in order to fully comprehend the lesson
of sharing.

== 6 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:44 pm
From: John Galt


Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> On Oct 9, 10:46 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>
>> False. I created the value that I traded to obtain the things I own.
>> In some few cases - not many - I created the things I own myself. I
>> have a right to them; no one else has any right to them.
>>
>> No one has a right to my effort.
>
> Translation: Mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine. Screw you, mine
> mine mine mine.
>
> Solution: remedial preschool in order to fully comprehend the lesson
> of sharing.

You think taxation is "sharing"?

Please. The issue has more moving parts than that.

JG


== 7 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:47 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike


On Oct 9, 1:44 pm, John Galt <kady...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> > On Oct 9, 10:46 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>
> >> False.  I created the value that I traded to obtain the things I own.
> >> In some few cases - not many - I created the things I own myself.  I
> >> have a right to them; no one else has any right to them.
>
> >> No one has a right to my effort.
>
> > Translation: Mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine. Screw you, mine
> > mine mine mine.
>
> >  Solution: remedial preschool in order to fully comprehend the lesson
> > of sharing.
>
> You think taxation is "sharing"?
>
> Please. The issue has more moving parts than that.
>
> JG

I am waiting for all you John Galts to shit or get off the pot. Take
to 'superior' minds and riches and move to some 'effing island like
you 'threaten' to. The sooner you leave the better for the rest of
Americans.

So when you leaving?


== 8 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:51 pm
From: Chaos out of Order


On Oct 9, 9:17 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> In fact, no one has a "right" to any material good or service.  Someone
> might choose to provide some goods and services to deadbeats, but that
> doesn't imply a right to them; and the provider may subsequently decide
> to stop providing them.
>
> You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
> TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner.  You don't have a
> "right" to goods or services.  If you want goods and services, you must
> pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
> voluntarily.  If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.
>
> That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.

Just because there isn't a right doesn't mean there shouldn't be a
right.

There are millions who work, many who I'm sure work harder than you
do--you just sound like one of those rich boys pampered by mommy and
daddy--yet they have no health coverage. They toil away to make their
employers wealthy, benefiting only marginally from their labors while
some Wall Street fatty sits on his butt and grows ever wealthier off
of that labor.


== 9 of 9 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:53 pm
From: John Galt


Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> On Oct 9, 1:44 pm, John Galt <kady...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
>>> On Oct 9, 10:46 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> False. I created the value that I traded to obtain the things I own.
>>>> In some few cases - not many - I created the things I own myself. I
>>>> have a right to them; no one else has any right to them.
>>>> No one has a right to my effort.
>>> Translation: Mine mine mine mine mine mine mine mine. Screw you, mine
>>> mine mine mine.
>>> Solution: remedial preschool in order to fully comprehend the lesson
>>> of sharing.
>> You think taxation is "sharing"?
>>
>> Please. The issue has more moving parts than that.
>>
>> JG
>
> I am waiting for all you John Galts to shit or get off the pot.

Wait all you like. Are you doing to answer the question? Is taxation, to
you "sharing?"

Take
> to 'superior' minds and riches and move to some 'effing island like
> you 'threaten' to.

Many already have, many more probably will. Are you going to answer the
question?

The sooner you leave the better for the rest of
> Americans.

I *am* an American, and have as many votes as you do. (OK, I guess
you're not going to answer the question.)
>
> So when you leaving?

My preference is to beat you looters' heads into the ground. You never
succeed for long, since your economic policies are unsustainable, and
the electorate always comes to their senses.

This time, it looks like a very short learning curve.

JG

==============================================================================
TOPIC: the Price of Marijuana to come down.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/49f81ea069abe782?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:38 am
From: Balvenieman

geo <georgewk@toast.net> wrote:

>but will they; States Rights !
A short-lived historical anomaly, sad to say. You forget that the
forces seeking to destroy the Federal Republic and substitute a strong
central gummint won the US Civil war and, since, the regression toward
totalitarian statism has continued at an accelerating pace. The states
have more-or-less surrendered control of their National Guards
(presumptive "militia"); their edumacation systems; their roads, bridges
and highways; their drivers' licensing procedures; their homeowners'
insurance structures; and, increasingly, their law enforcement, in
exchange for large bundles of "other people's money" from the national
government. Now, the most profigate, imprudent, and repressive of those
states are lining up, snivelling and whining, and pining for an
additional free-money "stimulus" from the central government in
circumstances under which the rational move, disregarding the pollution,
would be to bulldoze them and their entire populations of nitwits into
the ocean.
--
the Balvenieman
Running on single malt in U.S.A.
USDA zone 9b

==============================================================================
TOPIC: ╰☆╮Hot╰☆╮Minimum order is one,factory price also! Paypal payment free
shipping!!!!!<www.dotradenow.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/eee16b04e6497b47?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:39 am
From: wendy


we are one of the wholesale supplier in China ,and offer brand name
products at factory price,cheap
main products catalogues:

sport shoes:
Af1 shoes,ice cream shoes,Nike shoes,kobe,RIFT,James,air Jordan:
(1,2,3,3.5,4,4.5,5,5.5,6,6.5,7,7.5,8,9,9.5,10,11,12,13,14,14.5,15,16,17,18,-19,20,20.5,21,22,23)
Air max shoes:max
87,max90,max95,max97,max2003,max2004,max2005,max2006,,max180,max360,TN1,TN2-,
TN3,TN6,tn8,max ltd
Nike Shox shoes:shox,shox shoes,shox nz,shox oz,shox vc,shox
MONSTER,shox TUROB,shox R2,shox R3,shox R4,shox R5,shox tl,shox
TL1,shox TL2,shox TL3,shox TL4,shox TL5 Dunk shoes,puma shoes,DIESEL
shoes,DSQUARED shoes,Adidas, Adidas y-3,timberland,ugg boots,bape
shoes,prada shoes,D&G Shoes,gucci shoes,soccer shoes,Rigf shoes,kids
shoes,boot shoes,LV shoes,sandal shoes,converse shoes,chanel
shoes,Garnet,McGrady,Wade shoes,Kate,Duncan,HOGAN
shoes,SIMTH,lacoste,BALLY,BIKKEN BERGS,BOSS,VERSCE,ARMANI
(www.dotradenow.com)

jeans: Evisu,True Religion,bape,d&g,artful dodger,red monkey,LRG D&G
jeans,APE jean,BBC jeans,antik jean.RCOWER,ENYCEROCK Jean,,Rock
Republic Jeans,DIESEL Jeans,ARMANI Jeans,RMC Jeans,RRTFUL DODGER
Jeans,ANTIK Jeans
(www.dotradenow.com)

Hoody: bape,bbc,LRG,clh,ed hardy,GGG,Spider Jacket,G-Unit Jackets, G-
Star Jackets & North Jackets of Face 10 Deep Hoody,ed hardy hoody
(www.dotradenow.com)

jacket: ED hardy jacket,adidas jacket.red monkey jacket,MONCLER,G-
STAR,PRADA,SPYDER,AF coat,BABY PHAT,DSQ,artful dodger
(www.dotradenow.com)

T-shirt: bbc,crocodile,ed
hardy,Polo,lacoste,bape,ggg,BURBERRY,evisu,lrg,artful,
dodger,polo t- shirt,lacoste T-shirt,VERSACA,ARMANI,DIOR,tommy
(www.dotradenow.com)

short: BBC pants,bape pants,red monkey short,evisu short,sport
wear,Socks,BOSS shirt,JUICY,

woman apparel:Bikini,Juicy T-shirt,Locaste T-shirt,ED T-shirt,Juicy
Suit
(www.dotradenow.com)

Jersey: MLB NHL NFL NBA Jerseys, Football Jersey, Hats,
Clothing,mlb jerseys, nhl jerseys, nfl jerseys, nba jerseys, mlb
apparel, nhl merchandise, baseball jerseys, hockey jerseys, mlb
jackets, mlb merchandise, nhl apparel, nfl merchandise, nba
merchandise, nba merchandise, baseball jerseys, hockey jerseys,
customized jerseys, custom jerseys, personalized jerseys
HAT:knitted hat,bucket hat,fashion hat,straw hat,baseball hat,cowboy
hat,sports hat Hats & Caps Scarves & Shawls Holiday Gift & Decoration
Gloves & Mittens Hair Ornaments Promotion Gifts
(www.dotradenow.com)

BAG: Ladies' Handbags,louis vuitton,chanel
handbag,fendi,versace,GUCCI,fashion
bag,LOEUE,D&G,MIUMIU,JUICY,GUESS,VERSACA,tous,lacoste,SMITH,HERMES,FENDI,MA-
RC,PRADA
bag,,paper bag ,designer handbags,designer bag,mulberry bag,
Backpacks
Luggage,purse, Trolley Bags & Cases Travel Bags Popular Handbag
Laides' Fashion Designer Luxurious Leather Brand Name Handbag,coach
purses and coach wallet Authentic replica coach bag,tote bag,plastic
bag,gift bag,travel bag
(www.dotradenow.com)

WATCH: LV,Chanel,BREITLING watch,Omega, Tag Heuer.Rolex Watch, Gucci
Watch,
Luxury Watch,digital watch,LCD watch, Lover watch,analog watch,wrist
watch Quartz
Analog Watches Others Digital Watches Specialty Watches Analog-
Digital Watches
Mechanical Watches brand watch,Movado Watches,Baume Mercier
(www.dotradenow.com)

Accessories:
Handbag/Purse,belt,hat,scarf
LV,Chanel,Gucci,Coach,CHLOE,Dior,Juicy,Prada,Guess,D&G,Versace,Fendi

Glassess: LV Glassess,Chanel Glassess,GUCCI
Glassess,VERSACE,OKELY,POLICE,FENDI,BURBERRY,DIOR,RayBan,ARMANI,PRADA,D&G
Glassess

all the products listed on our website all are in stock! we have
more
in stock, Either you are large wholesaler or small business owner, we
have customized
programmers to suit your needs.

Hope sincerely to have glad and long term business relationship with
you.
If you are interested in our products and have any problem, welcome
to
contact us. we will be honest to answer your all problem .
web:www.dotradenow.com

==============================================================================
TOPIC: cheap property in WV,KY,NC,TN? want to build unrestricted
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3a7cd02ab7dfe59e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 11:59 am
From: "sr"


Thanks for the insight. I'll check into it. Is Lousiville, KY a safe
place?
thank you
I've been looking at Columbia, KY. Than I see there are a lot of Meth Labs
in some areas, that I have looked at, online.
This hasn't hit that hard in Maine, yet.
But, we are about 20 yrs. behind everyone else.

,
"Tony Sivori" <TonySivori@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.10.09.16.21.23.518552@yahoo.com...
> sr wrote:
>
>> Looking for a place with less snow.
>> Looking at container housing
>> must have unrestriced property
>> anyone know of cheap property that does not flood? Sandy in Maine
>
> Instead of building, have you considered an existing structure, priced
> right? Some of the less desirable HUD repos are dirt cheap. In some cases,
> where I live (Louisville KY) way under $20,000. I've seen some houses go
> for less than $10,000.
>
> The good things about HUD repos compared to bank repos are that you do not
> compete with house flippers and investors. HUD gives preference to owner
> occupants. Second, although there is no warranty, HUD will not
> intentionally hide defects regarding the property.
>
> http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/topics/hud_homes
>
> --
> Tony Sivori
> Due to spam, I'm filtering all Google Groups posters.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Rich seek "External Validation"
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/258c06a87b64aefb?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 12:45 pm
From: geo


but you knew that;

Losers have to "Win".
I guess it is their low self-esteem.
they must know their lacking "something" and oh do they "compensate".
It's rather sad, but they did create their own reality and it's probably
a matter of time before they hopefully really get a clue.
You might notice this in the so-called rich. External validation.
thought you might like to keep an eye out for these mutants.
--
money; what a concept!


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:44 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike


On Oct 9, 12:45 pm, geo <georg...@toast.net> wrote:
> but you knew that;
>
> Losers have to "Win".
> I guess it is their low self-esteem.
> they must know their lacking "something" and oh do they "compensate".
> It's rather sad, but they did create their own reality and it's probably
> a matter of time before they hopefully really get a clue.
> You might notice this in the so-called rich.  External validation.
> thought you might like to keep an eye out for these mutants.
> --
> money; what a concept!

You are right in many cases, but certainly no all.

I am the offspring of immigrants. My parents were no fans of
Comminists. I grew up poor and I had many occassions when I couldn't
afford to eat. I accumulated my money in order to never go hungry
again. I live in a modest home, I drive an older car and have never
thought to try and impress others. I just don't want to be hungry and/
or homeless.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Mens Leather Coat - size 46
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a6f609a1d17fae32?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 1:38 pm
From: Al


On Oct 8, 7:01 pm, ClothesOut <visual...@comcast.net> wrote:
> I'm selling a mens distressed leather coat. eBay auction ends tomorrow
> afternoon and the current bid is $49.99. Take a look. If you're not
> interested, consider passing the word along to someone else. To read
> the full description and see photos, go to item #300354130314.

I see a nice black one Ebay for $39.99 and it is much better shape.
However, it's a medium.
What's the point of spamming newsgroups over one item so trivial? You
already have a bid that exceeds the value. Take it or donate it to the
SA and take a tax deduction.
Be gone, satin.


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 9 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* WHAT TO DO IN CASE OF STUCK GAS PEDAL Re: Motorists KILLED due to floor mat
jamming up gas pedal, including an odfficer and his family - 3 messages, 2
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/beda867f55c92986?hl=en
* the Price of Marijuana to come down. - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/49f81ea069abe782?hl=en
* "Promote the general welfare of the United States" - doesn't mean what
leftists think - 14 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3f1993b181e2faf4?hl=en
* cheap text printer - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/d0bda871aec2554e?hl=en
* ★Free Shipping★Nike Jordan shoes paypal payment www.dotradenow.com - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/4f9559826d2382de?hl=en
* There is no "right" to health care - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e14cb160c2e4a0dd?hl=en
* cheap property in WV,KY,NC,TN? want to build unrestricted - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3a7cd02ab7dfe59e?hl=en
* 〖※surprise※〗: wholesale low price and high quality, hot brand goods free
shipping coat at www.ecyaya.com - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/2844032eaa3120b3?hl=en
* The Generals must act… - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a872f90eda04c649?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: WHAT TO DO IN CASE OF STUCK GAS PEDAL Re: Motorists KILLED due to floor
mat jamming up gas pedal, including an odfficer and his family
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/beda867f55c92986?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 6:45 am
From: RickMerrill


zeez wrote:
>
> enough wrote:
>> If this happens to you, the best thing to do is throw the car in
>> NEUTRAL, so you keep your power brakes and steering, failing that,
>> turn off the ignition (note, the Lexus with push button Start requires
>> you to hold down the button for a few seconds to shut off the engine)

Bull! You will not KNOW that it is a stuck gas pedal - it COULD be that
you have pressed the pedal instead of the BRAKE. Therefore what you
should be prepared to do Immediately is to put BOTH FEET ON THE BRAKE!

Furthermore, putting the car into neutral (assuming a stuck pedal) will
cause the engine to over rev and it will soon (probably) explode!
INSTEAD switch off the engine UNLESS you need to steer!!

You will already have put both feet on the brake so you are not
concerned with loss of power brakes.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 7:19 am
From: ranck@vt.edu


In misc.consumers.frugal-living RickMerrill <Rick0.merrill@gmail.lessspam.com> wrote:
> zeez wrote:
> >
> > enough wrote:
> >> If this happens to you, the best thing to do is throw the car in
> >> NEUTRAL, so you keep your power brakes and steering, failing that,
> >> turn off the ignition (note, the Lexus with push button Start requires
> >> you to hold down the button for a few seconds to shut off the engine)

> Bull! You will not KNOW that it is a stuck gas pedal - it COULD be that
> you have pressed the pedal instead of the BRAKE. Therefore what you
> should be prepared to do Immediately is to put BOTH FEET ON THE BRAKE!

Well, yes, make sure you really are on the brake. Manual transmission
cars don't have a big enough brake pedal to get both feet on, but
for automatics this is good advice.

> Furthermore, putting the car into neutral (assuming a stuck pedal) will
> cause the engine to over rev and it will soon (probably) explode!

For most modern cars with fuel injection (pretty much anything less
than 20 years old) there will be a rev limiter that prevents the
engine from over-revving. Engines will not explode. They might
fail dramatically, but not literally explode.

> INSTEAD switch off the engine UNLESS you need to steer!!

Nope, get it into neutral, bring it to a stop, then switch off.
If the motor damages itself, so what?

Bill Ranck
Blacksburg, Va.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:40 am
From: RickMerrill


ranck@vt.edu wrote:
> In misc.consumers.frugal-living RickMerrill <Rick0.merrill@gmail.lessspam.com> wrote:
>> zeez wrote:
>>> enough wrote:
>>>> If this happens to you, the best thing to do is throw the car in
>>>> NEUTRAL, so you keep your power brakes and steering, failing that,
>>>> turn off the ignition (note, the Lexus with push button Start requires
>>>> you to hold down the button for a few seconds to shut off the engine)
>
>> Bull! You will not KNOW that it is a stuck gas pedal - it COULD be that
>> you have pressed the pedal instead of the BRAKE. Therefore what you
>> should be prepared to do Immediately is to put BOTH FEET ON THE BRAKE!
>
> Well, yes, make sure you really are on the brake. Manual transmission
> cars don't have a big enough brake pedal to get both feet on, but
> for automatics this is good advice.
>
>> Furthermore, putting the car into neutral (assuming a stuck pedal) will
>> cause the engine to over rev and it will soon (probably) explode!
>
> For most modern cars with fuel injection (pretty much anything less
> than 20 years old) there will be a rev limiter that prevents the
> engine from over-revving. Engines will not explode. They might
> fail dramatically, but not literally explode.
>
>> INSTEAD switch off the engine UNLESS you need to steer!!
>
> Nope, get it into neutral, bring it to a stop, then switch off.
> If the motor damages itself, so what?
>
> Bill Ranck
> Blacksburg, Va.

Fair enough! Red-lining the engine is not too too good for it.

One evening I saw a smoking car, parked, the driver asleep with his
foot on the throttle! (40 yrs ago, so it could have caught fire) I
reported it via CB radio, reached in front of the driver and turned
off the switch - he just kept on snoring!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: the Price of Marijuana to come down.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/49f81ea069abe782?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 7:02 am
From: geo


In article <aNWdnfy2oMonrVLXnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@earthlink.com>,
Balvenieman <balvenieman@invalid.net> wrote:

> geo <georgewk@toast.net> wrote:
>
> >But some legal scholars and policy analysts say the government will
> >not be able to require California to help in enforcing the federal
> >marijuana ban if the state legalizes the drug.
> Sure it can: By simply making the public money teat contingent on
> "helping".

but will they;
States Rights !

and for prices to come down, the Gummint will have to curtail it's
price support system. "Law" enforcement.
--
money; what a concept!


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:07 am
From: Tony Sivori


geo wrote:

> "traveler" <Vallecito@aol.com> wrote:
>> dispensaries into all-purpose pot stores, and the open sale of joints
>> could become commonplace on mom-and-pop liquor store counters
>

Wouldn't it be a lot more frugal to quit smoking dope? Not judging. Just
sayin'.

--
Tony Sivori
Due to spam, I'm filtering all Google Groups posters.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: "Promote the general welfare of the United States" - doesn't mean what
leftists think
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3f1993b181e2faf4?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 7:51 am
From: Wilson Woods


Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> K wrote:
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 8, 1:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a
>>>> nation.
>>>
>>>
>>> wilson woods strikes again:) a country is only as healthy as its
>>> citizens.
>>
>>
>> The clause in Article I does not mean to promote any person's
>> individual welfare. It means to promote the welfare of the nation as
>> a political entity. That's what it means.
>
> I find Woods' argument compelling. Namely, healthy citizens

It does not provide a rationale for providing medical care to citizens.
The use of "welfare" in the Constitution doesn't provide a rationale
for Congress giving any goods and services to citizens.


== 2 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 7:52 am
From: Wilson Woods


Gogarty wrote:
> In article <JdqdnSG3ivinWlPXnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink.com>, Kvisions@live.con
> says...
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 1:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>> wilson woods strikes again:) a country is only as healthy as its
>>> citizens.
>> The clause in Article I does not mean to promote any person's individual
>> welfare. It means to promote the welfare of the nation as a political
>> entity. That's what it means.
>
> What is a nation that it should have a life distinct from its citizens whose
> welfare is no concern of the nation?

The use of the word welfare does not mean providing goods and services
to citizens.


== 3 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:28 am
From: Josh Rosenbluth


On Oct 9, 10:51 am, Wilson Woods <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> > K wrote:
> >> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>
> >>> On Oct 8, 1:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>
> >>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> >>>> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> >>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a
> >>>> nation.
>
> >>>  wilson woods strikes again:) a country is only as healthy as its
> >>> citizens.
>
> >> The clause in Article I does not mean to promote any person's
> >> individual welfare.  It means to promote the welfare of the nation as
> >> a political entity.  That's what it means.
>
> > I find Woods' argument compelling.  Namely, healthy citizens
>
> It does not provide a rationale for providing medical care to citizens.
>   The use of "welfare" in the Constitution doesn't provide a rationale
> for Congress giving any goods and services to citizens.

Looks like I mixed up Woods and Nickname. Nickname has the compelling
argument. Woods presents nothing more than a conclusory statement and
does not address Nickname's point.

Josh Rosenbluth


== 4 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:31 am
From: Tater Gumfries


On Oct 8, 12:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.

That ain't what the founders said about it. Sounds like you need a
schoolin too.

Tater


== 5 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:40 am
From: Wilson Woods


Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
> On Oct 9, 10:51 am, Wilson Woods <banm...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Josh Rosenbluth wrote:
>>> K wrote:
>>>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 8, 1:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a
>>>>>> nation.
>>>>> wilson woods strikes again:) a country is only as healthy as its
>>>>> citizens.
>>>> The clause in Article I does not mean to promote any person's
>>>> individual welfare. It means to promote the welfare of the nation as
>>>> a political entity. That's what it means.
>>> I find Woods' argument compelling. Namely, healthy citizens
>> It does not provide a rationale for providing medical care to citizens.
>> The use of "welfare" in the Constitution doesn't provide a rationale
>> for Congress giving any goods and services to citizens.
>
> Looks like I mixed up Woods and Nickname. Nickname has the compelling
> argument.

The stupid shit-4-braincell has no compelling argument at all. He
fundamentally can't read the Constitution and understand what it means.
The welfare referred to in the preamble and in Article I does not
refer to the material wellbeing of citizens. It does not provide a
rationale for providing any goods and services to citizens. People who
want to torture the text of the Constitution to try to make it mean that
know that they're lying sophists.


== 6 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:40 am
From: K


Tater Gumfries wrote:
> On Oct 8, 12:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>
> That ain't what the founders said about it.

It is.


== 7 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:47 am
From: Nickname unavailable


On Oct 9, 12:19 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> Nickname unavailable wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 2:30 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-
> > dog.com> wrote:
> >> K wrote:
> >>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> >>> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> >>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
> >> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
> >> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>
> >> The Preamble says "promote"   So that kills the idea that it authorizes
> >> government to "give" things to the people.
>
> >  here is the real truth,
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
>
> > The Preamble to the United States Constitution is
>
> An introductory statement of purpose with no force of law.
>

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution

The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


gee, the courts say otherwise.

> >> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
> >> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
> >> the Federal Government.
>
> >  no,
>
> Yes.
>
> >  the united states is a collective of citizens
>
> No.
>


yes, and the courts agree,
The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


its 'we the people" not we the individuals.

> >> People have distorted these parts of the constitution to create an
> >> imaginary clause of welfare for the people.
>
> >  unless of course
>
> No "unless".  He is correct:  the welfare clauses in the preamble and
> Article I are not about the welfare of people as individual citizens;
> they are about the welfare of the nation as a political entity.
>


keep lying, that hole is getting ever deeper.

The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


> >> Now tell us what United States means......  It means the United States
> >> Government also known today as the federal government as oppose to State
> >> Government or "the people" of Nation.
>
> >  we the people.
>
> No.  "The United States" in the Constitution means *either* the federal
> government, *or* the nation as a political entity.  It does not mean the
> people.


liar,

The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


== 8 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:54 am
From: Nickname unavailable


On Oct 9, 12:20 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> Nickname unavailable wrote:
> > On Oct 8, 3:03 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> >> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>
> >>> K wrote:
> >>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> >>>> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> >>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
> >>> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
> >>> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
> >>> The Preamble says "promote"   So that kills the idea that it authorizes
> >>> government to "give" things to the people.
> >>> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
> >>> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
> >>> the Federal Government.
> >> When the words "United States" appear in the Constitution, it means
> >> *either* (narrowly) the federal government, or (broadly) the nation as a
> >> *political* entity.  It most assuredly does *NOT* mean the people.
>
> >  "We the People of the United States"
>
> Yes?
>
> >> "If you torture the [Constitution] long enough, it will confess" --
> >> paraphrasing Ronald Coase.  Leftists attempt to torture the Constitution
> >> until it hollers the meaning the leftists want.
>
> >  if you are a lying fascist,
>
> There you go, swearing again.  That's all "fascist" is - a swearword.
> It is empty of meaning.

its a fact. deal with it.


== 9 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:57 am
From: K


Nickname unavailable wrote:
> On Oct 9, 12:19 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 2:30 pm, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-
>>> dog.com> wrote:
>>>> K wrote:
>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>>> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
>>>> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>>>> The Preamble says "promote" So that kills the idea that it authorizes
>>>> government to "give" things to the people.
>>> here is the real truth,
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
>>> The Preamble to the United States Constitution is
>> An introductory statement of purpose with no force of law.
>>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution
>
> The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
> statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
> Constitution is meant to serve.

Exactly. And that's *ALL* it is - it has no force of law. No court has
ever held it to have force of law. You're simply wrong.


>>>> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
>>>> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
>>>> the Federal Government.
>>> no,
>> Yes.
>>
>>> the united states is a collective of citizens
>> No.
>>
>
>
> yes,

No, no court says that.


>>>> People have distorted these parts of the constitution to create an
>>>> imaginary clause of welfare for the people.
>>> unless of course
>> No "unless". He is correct: the welfare clauses in the preamble and
>> Article I are not about the welfare of people as individual citizens;
>> they are about the welfare of the nation as a political entity.
>>
>
>
> keep lying

I never started. The use of the word welfare in the preamble and
Article I do not refer to the material welfare of people. You're just
wrong on this.


>>>> Now tell us what United States means...... It means the United States
>>>> Government also known today as the federal government as oppose to State
>>>> Government or "the people" of Nation.
>>> we the people.
>> No. "The United States" in the Constitution means *either* the federal
>> government, *or* the nation as a political entity. It does not mean the
>> people.
>
>
> liar,
>

Nope. Sorry, you're just wrong.


== 10 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:57 am
From: Nickname unavailable


On Oct 9, 12:22 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> hal wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:30:56 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
> > <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>
> >> K wrote:
> >>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> >>> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> >>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
> >> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
> >> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>
> >> The Preamble says "promote"   So that kills the idea that it authorizes
> >> government to "give" things to the people.
>
> >> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
> >> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
> >> the Federal Government.
>
> >> People have distorted these parts of the constitution to create an
> >> imaginary clause of welfare for the people.
>
> > Welfare for The People
>
> ...does not appear in the Constitution.  Sorry.

sure it does, in fact, the courts recognize the preamble as the
original intent of the constitution, and we the people is the first
sentence, in case you have not seen it yet, its here,


The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


== 11 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:57 am
From: K


Nickname unavailable wrote:
> On Oct 9, 12:20 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>> Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>> On Oct 8, 3:03 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>>>> K wrote:
>>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>>>> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
>>>>> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>>>>> The Preamble says "promote" So that kills the idea that it authorizes
>>>>> government to "give" things to the people.
>>>>> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
>>>>> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
>>>>> the Federal Government.
>>>> When the words "United States" appear in the Constitution, it means
>>>> *either* (narrowly) the federal government, or (broadly) the nation as a
>>>> *political* entity. It most assuredly does *NOT* mean the people.
>>> "We the People of the United States"
>> Yes?
>>
>>>> "If you torture the [Constitution] long enough, it will confess" --
>>>> paraphrasing Ronald Coase. Leftists attempt to torture the Constitution
>>>> until it hollers the meaning the leftists want.
>>> if you are a lying fascist,
>> There you go, swearing again. That's all "fascist" is - a swearword.
>> It is empty of meaning.
>
> its a fact.

It's empty of meaning. It's just swearing, that's all.


== 12 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:58 am
From: K


fuckwit bullshitted:
> On Oct 9, 12:22 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>> hal wrote:
>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:30:56 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
>>> <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>>>> K wrote:
>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>>> You mix up the Preamble that says Promote and article 1 section 8 that
>>>> says provide..... for the welfare of the United states.
>>>> The Preamble says "promote" So that kills the idea that it authorizes
>>>> government to "give" things to the people.
>>>> Yes article 1 section 8 says Provide, but no it doesn't say provide to
>>>> the people. It is specific in saying the Congress is to "PROVIDE" for
>>>> the Federal Government.
>>>> People have distorted these parts of the constitution to create an
>>>> imaginary clause of welfare for the people.
>>> Welfare for The People
>> ...does not appear in the Constitution. Sorry.
>
> sure it does,

It doesn't; not anywhere in the text of the Constitution.

You're just wrong.


== 13 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:59 am
From: Nickname unavailable


On Oct 9, 12:33 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>
> > On Oct 8, 3:16 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> >> Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>
> >>> On Oct 8, 2:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
> >>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
> >>>> services to people.  It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
> >>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
> >>> Well, no shit.
> >> Then, we are agreed:  "promote the general welfare of the United States"
> >> does not imply either a power or a duty to provide health care.  Thanks.
>
> > No.
>
> Yes, we're agreed:  no use of the word "welfare" in the Constitution
> creates or implies either a power or a duty of the federal government to
> provide health care.  That's simply not what the use of the word
> "welfare" anywhere in the Constitution means.
>
> Thanks.

that's not what the courts see, here it is, we the people, with all
of the promoting and providing that is not only in the preamble, but
also the constitution.

The Preamble to the United States Constitution is a brief introductory
statement of the fundamental purposes and guiding principles that the
Constitution is meant to serve. In general terms it states, and courts
have referred to it as reliable evidence of, the Founding Fathers'
intentions regarding the Constitution's meaning and what they hoped it
would achieve (especially as compared with the Articles of
Confederation).

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence,[1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the
Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and
establish this Constitution for the United States of America.


== 14 of 14 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:01 am
From: K


fuckwit bullshitted:
> On Oct 9, 12:33 am, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>> Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 8, 3:16 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>> Kickin' Ass and Takin' Names wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 8, 2:48 pm, K <Kvisi...@live.con> wrote:
>>>>>> The clause in Article I Section 8 does not mean to provide goods and
>>>>>> services to people. It means to promote welfare - the interests - of
>>>>>> the United States of America as a political entity - that is, as a nation.
>>>>> Well, no shit.
>>>> Then, we are agreed: "promote the general welfare of the United States"
>>>> does not imply either a power or a duty to provide health care. Thanks.
>>> No.
>> Yes, we're agreed: no use of the word "welfare" in the Constitution
>> creates or implies either a power or a duty of the federal government to
>> provide health care. That's simply not what the use of the word
>> "welfare" anywhere in the Constitution means.
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> that's not what the courts see, here it is, we the people,

The courts have never spoken on it.

Sorry, you're just wrong, little retard.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: cheap text printer
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/d0bda871aec2554e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:03 am
From: Warren Block


jeff <jeff_thies@att.net> wrote:
> Girlfriend is in need of a cheap printer for archiving office
> documents. Won't need to worry about color quality. Won't need high
> volume or speed. Availability and cost of black cartridges is an issue.
> So is the cost of the printer and to some extent the size. The old
> printer is getting retired because the ink is too hard to find.
>
> Whose got a recommendation? There's a slew of brands out there. I've
> been disappointed in Lexmark and pleased with HP (D7160) myself, but
> everyone makes lemons.

Avoid inkjets and buy a used laser printer:

http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/usedlasers.pdf

--
Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota * USA

==============================================================================
TOPIC: ★Free Shipping★Nike Jordan shoes paypal payment www.dotradenow.com
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/4f9559826d2382de?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 8:54 am
From: wendy


Nike Air Jordan Shoes
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 1.5 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 2 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 2.5 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 3
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 3.5
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 4 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 4.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 5 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 5.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 6 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 6.5 Kid
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 7 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 7.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 8
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 9 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 9.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 10 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 12 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 12.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 13 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 14 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 15 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 15.5 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 16 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 17 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 18 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 19 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 19.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 22 Man (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 22.5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 23 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 24 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Air Yeezy
Cheap Wholesale Jodan 23+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 1+Jordan 2+Jordan 5+Jordan 7
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 3+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 3+Jordan 5+Jordan 15 (paypal payment)
(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 4+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 4.5+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 5+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 6+AF1 Cheap Wholesale Jordan 9+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 9+Jordan 23 (paypal payment)
(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11.5+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+Anthony (paypal payment)
(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+Jordan 12
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+Jordan 13
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+Jordan 23 (paypal payment)
(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 11+Obama
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 12+AF1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 13+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 13+AJ6Rings
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 16.5+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 18+Jordan 23
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 20+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 21+Jordan 23
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 25+AF1 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan 6 unite1 Cheap Wholesale Jordan 8 unite1
Cheap Wholesale Jordan flying (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )
Cheap Wholesale Jordan foamposite liite Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan Melo M5 Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan True Flight Man
Cheap Wholesale Jordan Trunner Q4 (paypal payment)(www.dotradenow.com )

==============================================================================
TOPIC: There is no "right" to health care
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e14cb160c2e4a0dd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:17 am
From: K


In fact, no one has a "right" to any material good or service. Someone
might choose to provide some goods and services to deadbeats, but that
doesn't imply a right to them; and the provider may subsequently decide
to stop providing them.

You have no more "right" to health care than you have to a big screen
TV, Hawaiian holidays, a car, or a lobster dinner. You don't have a
"right" to goods or services. If you want goods and services, you must
pay for them, or you must persuade someone to give them to you
voluntarily. If your powers of persuasion are weak, you'll fare poorly.

That's simply how it is, and it's good and just.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: cheap property in WV,KY,NC,TN? want to build unrestricted
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/3a7cd02ab7dfe59e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:21 am
From: Tony Sivori


sr wrote:

> Looking for a place with less snow.
> Looking at container housing
> must have unrestriced property
> anyone know of cheap property that does not flood? Sandy in Maine

Instead of building, have you considered an existing structure, priced
right? Some of the less desirable HUD repos are dirt cheap. In some cases,
where I live (Louisville KY) way under $20,000. I've seen some houses go
for less than $10,000.

The good things about HUD repos compared to bank repos are that you do not
compete with house flippers and investors. HUD gives preference to owner
occupants. Second, although there is no warranty, HUD will not
intentionally hide defects regarding the property.

http://portal.hud.gov/portal/page/portal/HUD/topics/hud_homes

--
Tony Sivori
Due to spam, I'm filtering all Google Groups posters.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: 〖※surprise※〗: wholesale low price and high quality, hot brand goods
free shipping coat at www.ecyaya.com
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/2844032eaa3120b3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:27 am
From: salewto


〖※surprise※〗: wholesale low price and high quality, hot brand goods
free shipping coat at www.ecyaya.com

ecyaya.com (www.ecyaya.com) wholesale nike jordan
sneakers big cheap air jordan sneakers for sale.discount china nike
dunk sb shoes,nike exclusive jordan sneakers,custom nike air force
one
sneakers,nike dunk cheap,nike jordan sneakers wholesale,discount
supra www.ecyaya.com
shoes wholesale new balance shoes puma shoes,cheap adidas
shoes,authentic jordan sneakers,wholesale nike max 90 sheos,china
supplier nike max 87 max 2009 max 360 shoes,hot max 95 shoes,free
shipping prada shoes,nike retro jordan snekaers,other nike running
shoes,wholesale nike lebron james 6 sneakers,cheap nike zoom kobe 4
sneakers free shipping, kids jordan sneakers wholesale, nike air
force www.ecyaya.com
one 1 fusion jordan sneakers,buy sneaker for cheap,nike air max
premium leather sneakers,gucci tennis shoes for discount,high quality
gucci shoes,wholesale jordan fusion sneakers from china supply,cheap
air bape sneakers, China Nike product manufacturer,gucci shoes,supply
puma sneakers timberland shoes,discounts Jordans kicks shoes Cheap
Discount Basketball Sneakers on Sale, Nike Retro Air Jordan Melo M5,
United States Christian Audigier T-Shirt Wholesale Christian Audigier
T-Shirt New cheap Christian Audigier T-Shirt Manufacturers www.ecyaya.com
Suppliers,Wholesale Ed hardy AF T-Shirt, Discounted Louis Vuitton
Designer Handbags Clothes,Chanel and Coach Designer Handbag Wallets
Purse,Replica Louis Vuitton Handbag Accessories,Cheap Gucci handbags
Designer handbags by Gucci leather Purses Belt sunglasses,nike air
zoom signature basketball shoes, etc. www.ecyaya.com


www.ecyaya.com will bring you surprise. www.ecyaya.com
Here you can find your favorite. www.ecyaya.com
Just do it as soon as possible!!! www.ecyaya.com


welcome to visit!


Web address:www.ecyaya.com


==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Generals must act…
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a872f90eda04c649?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Oct 9 2009 9:27 am
From: martin


On Oct 7, 5:42 pm, Cicero Venatio <jazzyb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The Generals swear to uphold the Constitution, not swearing allegiance
> to a President.  If the Generals determine that the President is
> undermining the Constitution they have not a right but a duty to remove
> him from office.  General Petraeus and Dick Cheney can get this country
> back on track.  The absolute refusal, by Democrats, to jump start this
> economy with tax cuts for small business is killing the job market for
> decades to come.  These tax cuts should have been enacted weeks after
> Obama's inaugural, but now we learn that the Democrats will never enact
> tax cuts due to their ideology.  The Democrats plan is to slowly
> transition the middle class from an unemployment check to a welfare
> check.  There is no plan for jobs, because the health care will cause a
> second wave of unemployment for those who escaped the axe in the first
> wave.  And now Nancy Pelosi is talking about a VAT tax, which is a
> mammoth middle class tax, which will put the final nail in the Democrats
> failing economy.
>
> The Generals must act quickly, the longer they wait the more precarious
> the average citizen's future becomes.

Has it come to this?

tt

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en