- New watch? - 3 Updates
| The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Aug 29 07:39PM -0700 On 08/29/2016 05:30 PM, Michael Black wrote: > I have a few "atomic clocks" and it's fun to watch them all change numbers > at the same time. Any difference is not noticeable to the eye. Ours get hits while we're asleep. NOT going to stay up to watch. > everything, suddenly you're stuck with lots of clocks that are never quite > the same. But the atomic clocks, so long as they sync up, you know they > are right. There's nothing quite like owning a truly accurate timepiece. Those Swiss jerks have to make up for it with precious metal. -- Cheers, Bev Segal's Law: A man with one watch knows the time. A man with two is never sure. |
| BigDog811 <bigdog811@gmail.com>: Aug 30 07:31AM -0700 On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 10:39:23 PM UTC-4, The Real Bev wrote: > Cheers, Bev > Segal's Law: A man with one watch knows the time. > A man with two is never sure. Couldn't agree more. But don't sell those "Swiss jerks" short. I own a Rolex GMT Master that I bought in 1970 (that's 46 years ago for the arithmetically impaired out there). I've worn it almost every day since I bought it. It's never been serviced and keeps dead accurate time. The only time I need to adjust the time is twice a year when we spring forward and fall back. And a few times a year I have to run it forward to keep the date accurate. Before the misers who read this group go apoplectic about the cost of a Rolex; I paid $165 for it at a PX in Vietnam. That translates to a little over $3 a year so far, and going down each year I wear it. |
| The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Aug 30 08:20AM -0700 On 08/30/2016 07:31 AM, BigDog811 wrote: > accurate time. The only time I need to adjust the time is twice a > year when we spring forward and fall back. And a few times a year I > have to run it forward to keep the date accurate. I have an Omega Seamaster. It's a lovely thing, but it needed to be cleaned every couple of years. Ultimately it was cheaper (but a bigger nuisance) to send it to Switzerland to be cleaned than to have it done locally. I wondered how a waterproof watch got dirty inside and was told that the lubricant hardens/wears out/deteriorates. That's just WRONG. > Before the misers who read this group go apoplectic about the cost of > a Rolex; I paid $165 for it at a PX in Vietnam. That translates to a > little over $3 a year so far, and going down each year I wear it. That's probably about what the Casio has cost... -- Cheers, Bev "History I believe furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government." -- letter from Thomas Jefferson to Baron vonHumboldt, 1813 |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
