http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* Does God have a wife? - 23 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/9f82bef43c904553?hl=en
* Social Security No Raise - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/9061cabb53683e0d?hl=en
* I find Aesop fables to be the exact opposite of the Bible - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/12b29f18d275562f?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Does God have a wife?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/9f82bef43c904553?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 1:20 pm
From: Tom Sherman °_°
On 10/17/2010 2:57 PM, Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey& the Spirits of
> the Jungle"<nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> God is omnipotent.[...]
Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?
--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
I am a vehicular cyclist.
== 2 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 1:54 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
In <b22bc0b4-b6cb-4bf4-82b7-efb9877adc2c@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle wrote:
>(I want to emphasize that in no way I'm bored and looking to kill
>time. My girlfriend is away, which makes me think what would be of
>Adam without Eve)
>
>In my long years of hearing about God, I've never heard of him having
>a wife or at least a lover... WHY?
<I SNIP from here ro edit for space>
According to a joke at least 20 years old, God is...
The joke is about a preacher in a church describing God...
"God is both male and female, but also neither."
"God is both black and white, but also neither."
"God is both straight and gay, but also neither".
According to the joke, some young kiddie tells family upon coming home
from church his take from the above what God is.
Accordingly, "God is Michael Jackson".
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
== 3 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 2:01 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
In article <1a227$4cba7892$d8106f5c$28877@KNOLOGY.NET>, Edward Dolan wrote:
>"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
><nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:b22bc0b4-b6cb-4bf4-82b7-efb9877adc2c@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
<Snip to what E.D. has to say)
>Listen up, you god damn fucking stupid son of a bitch! There is no point in
>originating threads since all you have on your miniscule brain is one
>subject. Find your thread, and then stay on it for all eternity. That way
>you will have the freedom to consort with only your fellow idiots in peace.
<Snip from here>
Although there is sense of confinement of one topic to one thread, I
still see "Monkey" being much more entertaining than E.D. is. I see that
E.D.'s "chosen mission" appears to me to be basically being an opponent
to an offendor less-offensive than E.D. is.
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
== 4 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 2:21 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
In <ba612d45-1185-4829-bd9a-b7a3c92bff7a@v20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle wrote:
>On Oct 17, 12:09 am, Virgil <Vir...@home.esc> wrote:
>>
>> We do sometimes wonder whether any such thing might exist. but find no
>> objective or unequivocal evidence supporting any such conjecture, so
>> regard it as a matter of no consequence..
>
>You have failed to notice this subject is of cosmic importance. Why
>the Christians have been hiding that fact of God? Even the Mary
>Magdalene affair pales in comparison to this.
>
>You can't have a good dramatic play without a heroine or at least a
>bitch. There's no life in God without one. Sorry to say... He's dead!
"The King is dead - Long Live The King!"
According to the "Holy Bible", the self-proclaimed "King of the Jews"
lives again after being murdered, and tells how everybody "can live
again" after death.
The same says that the same self-proclaimed king of some to maybe all
also teaches the "Golden Rule"...
"Do Unto Others What You want them to Do Unto You". (Best-I-remember)
I would very heavily carry this onto the road - I yield right-of-way to
everyone and everything in sight in ways that I want these to yield to me
when "rules of the road" are "in my favor".
I stop for red lights when cross-traffic vehicles and pedestrians have
green light in conflict with me - I yield to those that I must yield to
according to "Rules Of The Road".
("Usual law", legally enforceable upon penalty, is that I have to not
run red lights even when I am not in conflict with a pedestrian or a
vehicle that sees a green light. I violate such law at my own risk of
enforcement penalties, but only when I am not in conflict with others that
"Rules Of The Road" requires me to yield to.)
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
== 5 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 2:27 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"Don Klipstein" <don@manx.misty.com> wrote in message
news:slrnibmp1d.71g.don@manx.misty.com...
> In article <1a227$4cba7892$d8106f5c$28877@KNOLOGY.NET>, Edward Dolan
> wrote:
>>"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
>><nolionnoproblem@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:b22bc0b4-b6cb-4bf4-82b7-efb9877adc2c@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> <Snip to what E.D. has to say)
>
>>Listen up, you god damn fucking stupid son of a bitch! There is no point
>>in
>>originating threads since all you have on your miniscule brain is one
>>subject. Find your thread, and then stay on it for all eternity. That way
>>you will have the freedom to consort with only your fellow idiots in
>>peace.
>
> <Snip from here>
>
> Although there is sense of confinement of one topic to one thread, I
> still see "Monkey" being much more entertaining than E.D. is. I see that
> E.D.'s "chosen mission" appears to me to be basically being an opponent
> to an offendor less-offensive than E.D. is.
I am not here to entertain, but to kick ass. I do it better than anyone else
on Usenet.
TM is good natured and does not easily take offense, but his prolific
posting is designed to do only one thing, and that is to destroy a small
newsgroup like RBS. I only monitor RBS, so he can get off this newsgroup
anytime he wants and that will be the end of it for me.
By the way, TM is only entertaining if you were born yesterday. He is a god
damn fucking idiot and a god damn stupid son of a bitch besides. In short,
he is a nut and a screwball. No one on these newsgroups pays the slightest
attention to him except for a few fellow idiots like yourself. I suggest you
get a life instead of wasting your time defending an asshole like TM. He is
a simpleton and the village idiot.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 6 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 2:41 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"Tom Sherman °_°" <twshermanREMOVE@THISsouthslope.net> wrote in message
news:i9flpg$va1$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> On 10/17/2010 2:57 PM, Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
Who is Mrs. Irish Mike?
>> On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey& the Spirits of
>> the Jungle"<nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> God is omnipotent.[...]
>
> Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?
Only a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great can answer those kind of
questions.
All TM knows is how to fuck his monkeys, which I believe he does at least
twice a day. Let us hope he gets HIV and croaks like the dumb bastard he is!
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 7 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 2:53 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
In <2f741cbf-ba22-425e-821b-f432b996f6ba@a36g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle wrote:
>On Oct 17, 10:15 am, FatterDumber& Happier Moe
><"WheresMyCheck"@UncleSamLoves.Mee> wrote:
>> His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle wrote:
>>
>> > (I want to emphasize that in no way I'm bored and looking to kill
>> > time. My girlfriend is away, which makes me think what would be of
>> > Adam without Eve)
>>
>> > In my long years of hearing about God, I've never heard of him having
>> > a wife or at least a lover... WHY?
>>
>> > He saw the need of giving Adam a partner, and though it came out
>> > wrong, nobody denies we still need a wife or lover. Actually I think a
>> > lover is better than a wife, but that's just me. I'd assume God would
>> > have a real wife according to his dignified post as head of the
>> > Christians or whatever religion he is.
>>
>> > Moreover people of his dignity can have a wife and lovers at the same
>> > time. The lovers don't have to be official either, as they can be
>> > aids, secretaries, etc. Of course, I'm not insinuating anything, just
>> > reflecting the fact that we really don't know.
>>
>> > The option that he is single would give rise to rumors and gossips.
>> > Who would elect a president that is single other than the perverted
>> > French? We in America choose candidates with a pretty family, and even
>> > a pretty dog. Then the big question arises one more time: DOES GOD
>> > HAVE A DOG?
>>
>> > Please, let's settle this once and for all.
>>
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > Just when you lost hope...
>>
>> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>>
>> Of course he has a wife, he was out in the workshop making our
>> universe while the little lady was cooking supper.
>> You are still thinking within the bounds of human thinking. You need to
>> get spiritual. Try to think in terms outside the human mind which is
>> impossible but we can try. If there is eternal life what would that be
>> like? If we think in terms of human thinking we would have forever to
>> learn every song and music piece ever thought of and then hear them
>> again and again until we were as sick of them as hearing one child's
>> tune over and over for eternity. We'd have plenty of time to learn all
>> the mathematical laws and the toughest equations and then what would we
>> do for entertainment?
>> Anyway it's time for you to go get a job. Surprise your girlfriend
>> when she gets back and have a job, that's assuming she comes back,
>> she's probably out looking for someone that can support her.
>> Better go get a job. You can major in philosophy while flipping
>> burgers. It's time for you to earn your space here on earth.
>> Go get a job.
>
>You forget THE WISDOM OF THE JUNGLE allows you to survive in adverse
>conditions. I don't like scarcity like in COMMUNISM or waste like in
>CAPITALISM but a surplus is created . In other words, there's
>abundance in the jungle to allow monkeys to philosophize. This wasn't
>possible until primitive men freed themselves from hunting-gathering
>and ask, "Who's God, and do we really need him?" They settled down in
>civilization and advised the Pharaohs that it was in their interest to
>declare a god and the rest is history.
>
>God is more of a capitalist in the sense he wasted so much raw
>material in the Universe to house us in this little green planet. But
>he really got a communist system ready for us when we die.
The "communist ideal" requires honesty and "fair play". History teaches
that historically on this planet, a "communist society" has greedy
violators taking from others upspringing due to such a society having
lower law enforcement against some of such thieves.
> Nothing like SUVs or Gated Communities. We are issued a pair of wings,
> and that's about it.
I have nothing against people being "Free Birds" with a pair of wings,
or a pair of wheels, plus a pair of pedals and a chain and a couple
sprockets, plus a handlebar.
What I have a problem with is "Top Dogs" claiming special privelege to
make the rules (and especially when largely disobeying rules that they
want enforced), and non-subservient wolf-like dogs being takers more than
givers (such as "stars" on Wall St).
"Rules Of The Road" are easier for me - I have a very high rate of
agreeance with what those are generally said to be.
I only disobey such when I am not in conflict with others on the road
that such rules require me to yield to. I only run red lights when I am
not impeding or in conflict with someone who has a green light. At my own
risk of violating laws that I agree with, when I can't see anyone that I
am violating against... I "go full steam ahead" if I would not bitch-out
a car-driver ("cager") for doing the same.
It appears to me that desire to make the rules requires obedience and
fair play. Furthermore, "Rules Of The Road" are established to an extent
such that a "Lone Wolf" has little ability to outright rewrite such. The
"honest lone wolf" merely gets away with what modern law enforcement
practice "allows", while doing unto others only what such wolf would let
others do unto such wolf when the table is turned.
(Maybe someday I will have to eat a $109.50 ticket with 3 points against
my license to drive vehicles with motors sometime when I fail to reduce my
speed to zero.0000 MPH at a stop sign while I was stopping at least as
much as I would want car-drivers / "cagers" to stop for me.)
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
== 8 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 3:19 pm
From: don@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein)
In <f9bbdca1-95ba-4417-9cab-54365d6cf8e1@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
>On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of
>the Jungle" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
(Whatever the wise monkey said)
> God is omnipotent. God is everything. So God is his own wife. He is
>the husband also. If he wants, he can be his own dog. God by
>definition is everything. If you must think of God in sexual terms,
>you could say he is auto-erotic. That's what happens when you're
>everything.
I have a liking for myself to be my own dog.
As a result, I like "rules of theb road", and I only disobey such
when such disobedience does not put me in conflict with others
according to such rules that I ageree with but sometimes violate anyway.
And, God appears to me to be all of gay, straight, bisexual and asexual,
as well as having both both and neither of the genders of the earthly life
forms that reproduce sexually from 2 individuals of different genders.
(As well as gender or lack thereof of life forms reproducing asexually,
and also genders of life forms not yet known known on this planet to have
more than 2 genders.)
> Now the reason you are concerned with God's wife and dog is because
>you can only think in terms of God as human, when in actuality God is
>everything. IF God were to speak to a human that human's mind would
>blow a gasket. People can't think in omnipotent terms, so they create
>God to look at like what they can almost understand-- like a galactic
>magician.
>
> So, what you are doing is trying to understand the unknowable. Your
>energy would be better served trying to better understand yourself.
>That way you might never understand God, but you'll at least
>understand a part of God.
>
> Peace Out and OMMMmmmmmm...
Not as much as I try to understand what God is, I do ride on roads
according to the "usual rules", only violating such when I am not
violating against anyone that I need to yield to according to such rules
(which I agree with).
So, I am not too concerned with who is God's wife, who is my wife, or
who I am a wife of. (Probably helps to support such statement the fact
that I am "one of those" sexually attracted to my own gender rather than
to a different gender. Given high worldwide birth rate, I see lack of
responsibility of every human individual to produce offspring.)
--
- Don Klipstein (don@misty.com)
== 9 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:01 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike
On Oct 17, 1:20 pm, Tom Sherman °_°
<twshermanREM...@THISsouthslope.net> wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 2:57 PM, Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
>
>
> > God is omnipotent.[...]
>
> Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?
>
> --
If there could be a rock so big then God could create it. And he
would be the rock. Undoubtly he could create a rock so big he would
have difficulty moving it.
That question is a quest to know the unknowable. Best to spend the
time knowing fully who you are. From there you would have an inkling
of understanding of who God is. If you can't know yourself, then you
certainly can not know God.
Hari Hari
== 10 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:09 pm
From: tmclone
There is no God. Period. Full. Stop. Move along and get a life.
== 11 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:16 pm
From: Mrs Irish Mike
On Oct 17, 4:09 pm, tmclone <tmcl...@searchmachine.com> wrote:
> There is no God. Period. Full. Stop. Move along and get a life.
If you don't look for God, you will never find it.
== 12 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:50 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"tmclone" <tmclone@searchmachine.com> wrote in message
news:544a661e-872f-4bf9-afef-55ec39d090d4@t8g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> There is no God. Period. Full. Stop. Move along and get a life.
Even a Great Saint like Saint Edward the Great agrees fully with the above.
Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 13 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 5:27 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 3:57 pm, Mrs Irish Mike <wilma6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of
>
> the Jungle" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> God is omnipotent. God is everything. So God is his own wife. He is
> the husband also. If he wants, he can be his own dog. God by
> definition is everything. If you must think of God in sexual terms,
> you could say he is auto-erotic. That's what happens when you're
> everything.
>
> Now the reason you are concerned with God's wife and dog is because
> you can only think in terms of God as human, when in actuality God is
> everything. IF God were to speak to a human that human's mind would
> blow a gasket. People can't think in omnipotent terms, so they create
> God to look at like what they can almost understand-- like a galactic
> magician.
>
> So, what you are doing is trying to understand the unknowable. Your
> energy would be better served trying to better understand yourself.
> That way you might never understand God, but you'll at least
> understand a part of God.
>
> Peace Out and OMMMmmmmmm...
You freaked me out. So there's nobody stopping him from blowing up our
mind and twisting any logic we may try. And he's so erratic in the
Bible that we never know what's next. That god is so powerful he can
make a wife bark like a dog, and the dog act like a wife.
== 14 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 5:37 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 4:20 pm, Tom Sherman °_°
<twshermanREM...@THISsouthslope.net> wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 2:57 PM, Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
>
> > On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey& the Spirits of
> > the Jungle"<nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > God is omnipotent.[...]
>
> Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?
He created the human race and then couldn't handle it, right?
== 15 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 5:39 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 5:01 pm, d...@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote:
> In article <1a227$4cba7892$d8106f5c$28...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Edward Dolan wrote:
> >"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
> ><nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> >news:b22bc0b4-b6cb-4bf4-82b7-efb9877adc2c@e14g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> <Snip to what E.D. has to say)
>
> >Listen up, you god damn fucking stupid son of a bitch! There is no point in
> >originating threads since all you have on your miniscule brain is one
> >subject. Find your thread, and then stay on it for all eternity. That way
> >you will have the freedom to consort with only your fellow idiots in peace.
>
> <Snip from here>
>
> Although there is sense of confinement of one topic to one thread, I
> still see "Monkey" being much more entertaining than E.D. is. I see that
> E.D.'s "chosen mission" appears to me to be basically being an opponent
> to an offendor less-offensive than E.D. is.
> --
> - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)
I hate to say this, but Ed has chosen the path of the Devil.
== 16 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 5:45 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 5:21 pm, d...@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote:
> In <ba612d45-1185-4829-bd9a-b7a3c92bf...@v20g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle wrote:
>
> >On Oct 17, 12:09 am, Virgil <Vir...@home.esc> wrote:
>
> >> We do sometimes wonder whether any such thing might exist. but find no
> >> objective or unequivocal evidence supporting any such conjecture, so
> >> regard it as a matter of no consequence..
>
> >You have failed to notice this subject is of cosmic importance. Why
> >the Christians have been hiding that fact of God? Even the Mary
> >Magdalene affair pales in comparison to this.
>
> >You can't have a good dramatic play without a heroine or at least a
> >bitch. There's no life in God without one. Sorry to say... He's dead!
>
> "The King is dead - Long Live The King!"
>
> According to the "Holy Bible", the self-proclaimed "King of the Jews"
> lives again after being murdered, and tells how everybody "can live
> again" after death.
>
> The same says that the same self-proclaimed king of some to maybe all
> also teaches the "Golden Rule"...
>
> "Do Unto Others What You want them to Do Unto You". (Best-I-remember)
>
> I would very heavily carry this onto the road - I yield right-of-way to
> everyone and everything in sight in ways that I want these to yield to me
> when "rules of the road" are "in my favor".
>
> I stop for red lights when cross-traffic vehicles and pedestrians have
> green light in conflict with me - I yield to those that I must yield to
> according to "Rules Of The Road".
> ("Usual law", legally enforceable upon penalty, is that I have to not
> run red lights even when I am not in conflict with a pedestrian or a
> vehicle that sees a green light. I violate such law at my own risk of
> enforcement penalties, but only when I am not in conflict with others that
> "Rules Of The Road" requires me to yield to.)
> --
> - Don Klipstein (d...@misty.com)
Many Christians perhaps interpret human life as transitory and killing
a cyclist is just the will of God ("He's now with God"). Perhaps they
don't think at all and drive recklessly.
== 17 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 5:52 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 6:19 pm, d...@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote:
> In <f9bbdca1-95ba-4417-9cab-54365d6cf...@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> >On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of
> >the Jungle" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> (Whatever the wise monkey said)
>
> > God is omnipotent. God is everything. So God is his own wife. He is
> >the husband also. If he wants, he can be his own dog. God by
> >definition is everything. If you must think of God in sexual terms,
> >you could say he is auto-erotic. That's what happens when you're
> >everything.
>
> I have a liking for myself to be my own dog.
>
> As a result, I like "rules of theb road", and I only disobey such
> when such disobedience does not put me in conflict with others
> according to such rules that I ageree with but sometimes violate anyway.
>
> And, God appears to me to be all of gay, straight, bisexual and asexual,
> as well as having both both and neither of the genders of the earthly life
> forms that reproduce sexually from 2 individuals of different genders.
> (As well as gender or lack thereof of life forms reproducing asexually,
> and also genders of life forms not yet known known on this planet to have
> more than 2 genders.)
>
> > Now the reason you are concerned with God's wife and dog is because
> >you can only think in terms of God as human, when in actuality God is
> >everything. IF God were to speak to a human that human's mind would
> >blow a gasket. People can't think in omnipotent terms, so they create
> >God to look at like what they can almost understand-- like a galactic
> >magician.
>
> > So, what you are doing is trying to understand the unknowable. Your
> >energy would be better served trying to better understand yourself.
> >That way you might never understand God, but you'll at least
> >understand a part of God.
>
> > Peace Out and OMMMmmmmmm...
>
> Not as much as I try to understand what God is, I do ride on roads
> according to the "usual rules", only violating such when I am not
> violating against anyone that I need to yield to according to such rules
> (which I agree with).
>
> So, I am not too concerned with who is God's wife, who is my wife, or
> who I am a wife of. (Probably helps to support such statement the fact
> that I am "one of those" sexually attracted to my own gender rather than
> to a different gender. Given high worldwide birth rate, I see lack of
> responsibility of every human individual to produce offspring.)
This is meant to represent our tendency to vote for candidates with
"pretty families." Who the fuck cares? The day YOU run for president
and can change our PREDATORY RULES OF THE ROADS, you'll have my full
support.
In the meantime, God gets an F.
== 18 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:13 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
On Oct 17, 6:19 pm, d...@manx.misty.com (Don Klipstein) wrote:
> In <f9bbdca1-95ba-4417-9cab-54365d6cf...@z30g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
> >On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of
> >the Jungle" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> (Whatever the wise monkey said)
>
> > God is omnipotent. God is everything. So God is his own wife. He is
> >the husband also. If he wants, he can be his own dog. God by
> >definition is everything. If you must think of God in sexual terms,
> >you could say he is auto-erotic. That's what happens when you're
> >everything.
>
> I have a liking for myself to be my own dog.
>
> As a result, I like "rules of theb road", and I only disobey such
> when such disobedience does not put me in conflict with others
> according to such rules that I ageree with but sometimes violate anyway.
>
> And, God appears to me to be all of gay, straight, bisexual and asexual,
> as well as having both both and neither of the genders of the earthly life
> forms that reproduce sexually from 2 individuals of different genders.
> (As well as gender or lack thereof of life forms reproducing asexually,
> and also genders of life forms not yet known known on this planet to have
> more than 2 genders.)
>
> > Now the reason you are concerned with God's wife and dog is because
> >you can only think in terms of God as human, when in actuality God is
> >everything. IF God were to speak to a human that human's mind would
> >blow a gasket. People can't think in omnipotent terms, so they create
> >God to look at like what they can almost understand-- like a galactic
> >magician.
>
> > So, what you are doing is trying to understand the unknowable. Your
> >energy would be better served trying to better understand yourself.
> >That way you might never understand God, but you'll at least
> >understand a part of God.
>
> > Peace Out and OMMMmmmmmm...
>
> Not as much as I try to understand what God is, I do ride on roads
> according to the "usual rules", only violating such when I am not
> violating against anyone that I need to yield to according to such rules
> (which I agree with).
>
> So, I am not too concerned with who is God's wife, who is my wife, or
> who I am a wife of. (Probably helps to support such statement the fact
> that I am "one of those" sexually attracted to my own gender rather than
> to a different gender. Given high worldwide birth rate, I see lack of
> responsibility of every human individual to produce offspring.)
This is meant to represent our tendency to vote for candidates with
"pretty families." Who the fuck cares? The day YOU run for president
and can change our PREDATORY RULES OF THE ROADS, you'll have my full
support.
In the meantime, God gets an F.
== 19 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:19 pm
From: tmclone
On Oct 17, 4:16 pm, Mrs Irish Mike <wilma6...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 4:09 pm, tmclone <tmcl...@searchmachine.com> wrote:
>
> > There is no God. Period. Full. Stop. Move along and get a life.
>
> If you don't look for God, you will never find it.
THERE IS NO "GOD". My doG but you're a tool. PLONK!
== 20 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:28 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
<comandante.banana@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:30446297-607e-468c-a9d9-ae6fb1404326@c10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> In article <1a227$4cba7892$d8106f5c$28...@KNOLOGY.NET>, Edward Dolan
> wrote:
[...]
> >Listen up, you god damn fucking stupid son of a bitch! There is no point
> >in
> >originating threads since all you have on your miniscule brain is one
> >subject. Find your thread, and then stay on it for all eternity. That way
> >you will have the freedom to consort with only your fellow idiots in
> >peace.
>>> I hate to say this, but Ed has chosen the path of the Devil.
I hate to say this, but TM has chosen the path of the Idiot.
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 21 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:30 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
<comandante.banana@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:0cdb7705-f92c-492c-b70a-87acc0583931@l8g2000yql.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> Many Christians perhaps interpret human life as transitory and killing
a cyclist is just the will of God ("He's now with God"). Perhaps they
don't think at all and drive recklessly.
What everybody knows is that you are one fucking idiot. A bullet though your
addled brain is an end devoutly to be wished for. Or pray god, some motorist
will take you out!
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 22 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:34 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
<comandante.banana@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:22813b7b-30d2-4d57-a5e5-f9a14a603bc0@w19g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 17, 4:20 pm, Tom Sherman °_°
<twshermanREM...@THISsouthslope.net> wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 2:57 PM, Mrs Irish Mike wrote:
>
> > On Oct 16, 8:02 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey& the Spirits of
> > the Jungle"<nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > God is omnipotent.[...]
>
> Can God create a rock so big he cannot lift it?
>>> He created the human race and then couldn't handle it, right?
He sure as hell did not create you. You are a creation of the Devil. Ride
your bike more (and post less) so some Florida motorist can kill you! Then
you can return to Hell and fuck your g.d. monkeys!
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
== 23 of 23 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 6:40 pm
From: "Edward Dolan"
"His Highness the TibetanMonkey & the Spirits of the Jungle"
<comandante.banana@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:736b22f0-e21f-4ed4-a62f-e79cd75ff56b@l20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
[...]
> You freaked me out. So there's nobody stopping him from blowing up our
mind and twisting any logic we may try. And he's so erratic in the
Bible that we never know what's next. That god is so powerful he can
make a wife bark like a dog, and the dog act like a wife.
When referring to God in whatever person, the pronoun should be capitalized,
you g.d. fucking idiot! I only regret that the Devil, when he made you, did
not give you a brain!
Fucking Regards,
Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota
aka
Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Social Security No Raise
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/9061cabb53683e0d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:52 pm
From: walt tonne
On Oct 17, 8:31 am, a real cheapskate <hall...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Oct 17, 1:05 am, fred1...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> > Solution Nov. 2 replace ,em all.....
>
> SS recipents may get a 250 buck bonus, if obama has his way.
>
> depends on the coming election
Let it be noted that federal workers got a 3.5% raise. These
"workers" average over $74K yearly.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: I find Aesop fables to be the exact opposite of the Bible
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/12b29f18d275562f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Oct 17 2010 4:56 pm
From: walt tonne
Well done Mr.Dolan!
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
