Thursday, November 21, 2019

Digest for misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com - 14 updates in 5 topics

ggggg9271@gmail.com: Nov 20 09:02PM -0800

On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 7:21:09 PM UTC-7, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 6:08:34 PM UTC-5, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
> > Why can't the U.S. just use Canada as a model?
 
> Do you want to pay for healthcare for every deadbeat and welfare recipient?
 
https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health
ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Nov 20 10:04PM -0800


> https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health
 
And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest.
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 21 06:54AM -0800

On 11/20/2019 10:04 PM, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 11:02:16 PM UTC-6, gggg...@gmail.com wrote:
 
>> https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health
 
> And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest.
 
How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare?
ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Nov 21 08:54AM -0800

On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:55:00 AM UTC-6, Bob F wrote:
 
> >> https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health
 
> > And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest.
 
> How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare?
 
None. They hate the thought of getting older and having to use any type
of medical insurance but I've not heard one say they hate having Medicare.
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 21 04:17PM -0800

On 11/21/2019 8:54 AM, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote:
 
>> How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare?
 
> None. They hate the thought of getting older and having to use any type
> of medical insurance but I've not heard one say they hate having Medicare.
 
IT turn out, when people don't have to worry about cost every time they
go to the doctor, they are happier. And healthier. and live longer and
better. And cost a lot less to keep healthy.
 
That's why the rest of the industrialized world is healthier, happier,
live longer, have lower infant mortality. And spend 1/2 as much as we do.
 
Ignore the never-ending lies about how they hate their "medicare for
all". Few of them would not immediately condemn any effort to convert to
our stupid expensive system. People in UK demonstrated immediately when
trump suggested that they should change to our system.
"catalpa" <catalpa@entertab.org>: Nov 18 09:19PM -0500

<ggggg9271@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4dc31fa8-a649-4cbd-bc55-fb4fd563ec29@googlegroups.com...
> https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2019-11-11-cities-ban-natural-gas-to-fight-climate-change
 
And how does banning the cheapest energy available help low income people
already suffering with income equality?
 
This nonsense is the backdoor antifracking movement.
John Weiss <jrweiss98155@comcast.net>: Nov 16 07:35AM -0800

On 11/16/2019 06:55, Bob F wrote:
 
>> Seattle is just as bad these days.  The mayor proposed the same thing
>> a couple weeks ago...
 
> Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem.
 
First, define the problem. Then assess how much people are willing to
sacrifice to solve the problem.
 
It is clear to me that the underlying problem is that we have expanded
the world population too much to be sustainable at this level, much less
any constantly-increasing level above current. My plan is to cut the
number of children being born so the world population will shrink to a
level that is sustainable. Restrictions on the number of children a
couple can have was tried in China, and worked to some extent, but was
deemed socially unacceptable.
 
As for the specific issue of natural gas, banning its use is NOT a
solution at all! Replacing all that gas use with electricity means
electric production will have to be significantly increased. In the
near term, until wind & solar with adequate storage is practical on that
scale, additional electric production will be via burning natural gas.
A gas furnace in the home is 95-98% efficient. Producing electricity
from natural gas is AT BEST 50% efficient. So banning home use will
actually increase consumption!
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 16 06:55AM -0800

On 11/15/2019 10:24 PM, John Weiss wrote:
>> I knew it had to be California.  The land of loony people.
 
> Seattle is just as bad these days.  The mayor proposed the same thing a
> couple weeks ago...
 
Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem.
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Nov 16 08:40AM -0800

On 11/16/2019 06:55 AM, Bob F wrote:
 
>> Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing a
>> couple weeks ago...
 
> Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem.
 
Perhaps change the way the sun works. Altering the laws of physics
might also be helpful. Easiest, although less possible, would be
slapping some common sense into a lot of people.
 
--
Cheers, Bev
"You won't like me when I'm angry because I always back up my rage
with facts and documented sources." - The Credible Hulk
John Weiss <jrweiss98155@comcast.net>: Nov 15 10:24PM -0800

On 11/15/2019 15:18, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote:
 
>> https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2019-11-11-cities-ban-natural-gas-to-fight-climate-change
 
> I read this garbage the other day and before I even started wasting my time
> I knew it had to be California. The land of loony people.
 
Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing a
couple weeks ago...
GLOBE CRACKER ADMIN <WEHACKYOURWIFI@GLOBE.COM>: Nov 15 11:27PM

Get globe wifi and have your connection hacked by their bullshit
modems/dns filtering. crap,crap,crap. I am getting wifi nearly for free.
I would NEVER pay Globe for internet. Try PLDT fiber MUCH better.
Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 18 09:36PM -0800

On 11/18/2019 5:59 AM, Whoey Louie wrote:
> And if it's the AOA are they used on other planes? Does the company
> that makes them have similar designs in other planes that could fail
> in a similar way?
 
As I said before, the corporate structure run by bean counters has
destroyed the engineering quality. Ahhh, the wonders of capitalism!!
rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Nov 18 07:28PM -0700

On 11/18/2019 07:10 PM, catalpa wrote:
 
> The last thing I want is a blanket that weighs more.
 
> As weighted blankets exist, do weightless blankets exist? Or do I just crank
> up the heat so I don't need a blanket?
 
I thought a weighted blanket was something you wrapped your wife in
before you threw her in the lake.
"catalpa" <catalpa@entertab.org>: Nov 18 09:10PM -0500

<ggggg9271@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:13f5c670-10b8-4e1a-92b1-4a97e0e3c89a@googlegroups.com...
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-finds/2019/02/09/everything-you-need-to-know-before-buying-a-weighted-blanket/#1d1edcf36b07
 
The things that exist that I would never think of.
 
The last thing I want is a blanket that weighs more.
 
As weighted blankets exist, do weightless blankets exist? Or do I just crank
up the heat so I don't need a blanket?
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: