Thursday, August 7, 2008

25 new messages in 6 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* To juice or not. - 10 messages, 6 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb065ec0061ab7cd?hl=en
* The leeches are reaching for more - 5 messages, 4 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c1f04e2aa1094da5?hl=en
* Part of frugal living may be spotting the next mess before it blind sides
you. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/82578bd2c1b6f6f9?hl=en
* Frugal ideas (on topic) - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b0fb633415061f1d?hl=en
* Some say 'Knowledge is power'... and a way to make a living. - 5 messages, 2
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b8fb9fc6e8757602?hl=en
* Free $100 In Gas at Your Favorite Station - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c804112fbe31d284?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: To juice or not.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb065ec0061ab7cd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:45 pm
From: "cybercat"

"Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:adcm949ucu80cmbho6hfc6s58vm8urlu3a@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
> <blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>>
>>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
>>
>>your pal,
>>blake
>
>
> And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.

Yes indeed, you can tell by how much better shape the nation is in than when
Clinton was president. Jesus. What a moron you are.


== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 2:07 pm
From: "Gregory Morrow"

cybercat wrote:

>
> "Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:adcm949ucu80cmbho6hfc6s58vm8urlu3a@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
> > <blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
> >>
> >>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
> >>
> >>your pal,
> >>blake
> >
> >
> > And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.
>
> Yes indeed, you can tell by how much better shape the nation is in than
when
> Clinton was president. Jesus. What a moron you are.


What was this "better shape" that we were in during the Clinton years? Be
*specific*...


--
Best
Greg


== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:57 pm
From: clams_casino


Gregory Morrow wrote:

>blake murphy wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:09:09 -0500, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>clams_casino wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Pan wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:38:54 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>You mean, IKYABWAI. Dad.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Now then, I realize you're bitter because you're looking at EIGHT
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>years
>
>
>>>of
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Democratic administrations, but if we could take EIGHT years of the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>First
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>Chimp, you can take eight years of our guy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And even if you can't, you have to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>*cackle*
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>Don't cackle, until after the election, and if your right I will be
>>>>>bitter, and fight thru my state's rep's, to stop what I can.
>>>>>
>>>>>And again the hate Bush statement, "first chimp".
>>>>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
>>>>>passed?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Restoring *dignity* to the office of the Presidency after the *severe*
>>>damage that Clintoon did to the office...???
>>>
>>>
>><derisive snort>
>>
>>you mean english as a second (or third) language george? you gotta be
>>shittin' me.
>>
>>
>
>
>I'm not talkin' about "style" blake...
>
>Georgie Porgie has not "stained" the office of the presidency with personal
>scandal as Bill Clintoon did...no Monica, no "blue dress", no witchity
>Hillary throwin' stuff around the White House at all hours...no YEARS wasted
>parsing adolescent and self - destructive Billy Clintoon's behaviours...
>
>I haven't seen ANY big moves to impeach our current President - have
>you...???
>
>
>
>
You are kidding, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush

"On June 9, 2008, Dennis Kucinich gave official notice of his intention
to introduce 35 articles of impeachment against George W. Bush to the
U.S. House of Representatives. On June 10, 2008, as Congressman Robert
Wexler joined Kucinich as co-sponsor of the resolution. The House voted
251 to 166 to refer the impeachment resolution to the Judiciary
Committee on July 25."

"Proponents of impeaching Bush assert that one or more of his actions
qualify as "high crimes and misdemeanors" under which the president can
constitutionally be impeached."

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:09 pm
From: clams_casino


Gregory Morrow wrote:

>cybercat wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:adcm949ucu80cmbho6hfc6s58vm8urlu3a@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
>>><blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
>>>>
>>>>your pal,
>>>>blake
>>>>
>>>>
>>>And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.
>>>
>>>
>>Yes indeed, you can tell by how much better shape the nation is in than
>>
>>
>when
>
>
>>Clinton was president. Jesus. What a moron you are.
>>
>>
>
>
>What was this "better shape" that we were in during the Clinton years? Be
>*specific*...
>
>
>
>
for a start - "Clinton presided over the longest period of peace-time
economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget
and a reported federal surplus (Based on Congressional accounting rules,
at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion)"

"Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of
office rating of any President since WW II"

"Clinton and Gore were responsible for pressing almost all federal
agencies, the U.S. court system and the U.S. military onto the Internet,
thus opening up America's government to more of America's citizens than
ever before."

What was the question again?

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:12 pm
From: Marsha


clams_casino wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush
>
> "On June 9, 2008, Dennis Kucinich gave official notice of his intention
> to introduce 35 articles of impeachment against George W. Bush to the
> U.S. House of Representatives. On June 10, 2008, as Congressman Robert
> Wexler joined Kucinich as co-sponsor of the resolution. The House voted
> 251 to 166 to refer the impeachment resolution to the Judiciary
> Committee on July 25."
>
> "Proponents of impeaching Bush assert that one or more of his actions
> qualify as "high crimes and misdemeanors" under which the president can
> constitutionally be impeached."

Dennis Kucinich is a sore loser who's tried for the presidential
nomination a billion times. He's seeking attention for his next bid,
nothing more, and he's wasting taxpayer dollars doing it.

Marsha/Ohio

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:28 pm
From: max


In article <3omdnY9LN696_AbVnZ2dnUVZ_obinZ2d@earthlink.com>,
"Gregory Morrow" <FlyPrahaJakartaByTU104Jet@flyokayflycsa.cz> wrote:

> cybercat wrote:
>
> >
> > "Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:adcm949ucu80cmbho6hfc6s58vm8urlu3a@4ax.com...
> > > On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
> > > <blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
> > >>
> > >>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
> > >>
> > >>your pal,
> > >>blake
> > >
> > >
> > > And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.
> >
> > Yes indeed, you can tell by how much better shape the nation is in than
> when
> > Clinton was president. Jesus. What a moron you are.
>
>
> What was this "better shape" that we were in during the Clinton years? Be
> *specific*...


There was the BBQ expansion, eg. Honey-1, Calvin's and Fat Willy's and
that good place to eat across from Oprah's Harpo studio (mo 'southern,
not strictly bbq).

--
This signature can be appended to your outgoing mesages. Many people include in
their signatures contact information, and perhaps a joke or quotation.

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:44 pm
From: clams_casino


Marsha wrote:

> clams_casino wrote:
>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movement_to_impeach_George_W._Bush
>>
>> "On June 9, 2008, Dennis Kucinich gave official notice of his
>> intention to introduce 35 articles of impeachment against George W.
>> Bush to the U.S. House of Representatives. On June 10, 2008, as
>> Congressman Robert Wexler joined Kucinich as co-sponsor of the
>> resolution. The House voted 251 to 166 to refer the impeachment
>> resolution to the Judiciary Committee on July 25."
>>
>> "Proponents of impeaching Bush assert that one or more of his actions
>> qualify as "high crimes and misdemeanors" under which the president
>> can constitutionally be impeached."
>
>
> Dennis Kucinich is a sore loser who's tried for the presidential
> nomination a billion times. He's seeking attention for his next bid,
> nothing more, and he's wasting taxpayer dollars doing it.
>
>
Probably true in both cases, but the poster claimed "I haven't seen ANY
big moves to impeach our current President - have you...???"

I consider a 251 to 166 vote to be a big move, don't you?

== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:13 pm
From: Marsha


clams_casino wrote:
> Marsha wrote:
>> Dennis Kucinich is a sore loser who's tried for the presidential
>> nomination a billion times. He's seeking attention for his next bid,
>> nothing more, and he's wasting taxpayer dollars doing it.
>>
>>
> Probably true in both cases, but the poster claimed "I haven't seen ANY
> big moves to impeach our current President - have you...???"
>
> I consider a 251 to 166 vote to be a big move, don't you?

Big move? No. Grandstanding and worthless? Yes.

Marsha/Ohio

== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:42 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
news:_0Nmk.14259$LF2.5862@newsfe09.iad...
> Gregory Morrow wrote:
>
>>cybercat wrote:
>>
>>
snip (hopefully got it right)
>>
>>
>>What was this "better shape" that we were in during the Clinton years? Be
>>*specific*...

> for a start - "Clinton presided over the longest period of peace-time
> economic expansion in American history, which included a balanced budget
> and a reported federal surplus (Based on Congressional accounting rules,
> at the end of his presidency Clinton reported a surplus of $559 billion)"

well, here we go again. the key phrase here is: "Based on Congressional
accounting rules", which aren't worth a thing by accounting practices.
always trying to hide something or other with those rules, specifically that
THERE WAS NO DAMN BUDGET SURPLUS, ONLY THE PROMISE OF PAYMENTS FOR THE
ANALOG AIRWAVES THAT WERE SOLD. I'M NOT SURE THAT THOSE PAYMENTS HAVE BEEN
MADE EVEN AS WE WRITE.

you cannot have a surplus with money you have yet to collect. any idiot
can figure that out.

and govt still doesn't turn on a dime, although it's able shift faster now
than then.
so, we really don't know that clinton was entirely responsible for the
expansion, nor do we really know that gw is entirely responsible for this
upcoming recession. previous administration policies come into play and it
just can't be cut and dried sorted out.


> "Clinton left office with an approval rating at 65%, the highest end of
> office rating of any President since WW II"

maybe yes, maybe no. all this crap can be manipulated, and is, all the
time.

>
> "Clinton and Gore were responsible for pressing almost all federal
> agencies, the U.S. court system and the U.S. military onto the Internet,
> thus opening up America's government to more of America's citizens than
> ever before."

as most likely would have any other president during that timeframe. no
way we'll ever know if it is something special, just to clinton.


== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:45 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"Marsha" <mas@xeb.net> wrote in message news:g7ga40$s0a$1@news.datemas.de...
> clams_casino wrote:
>> Marsha wrote:
>>> Dennis Kucinich is a sore loser who's tried for the presidential
>>> nomination a billion times. He's seeking attention for his next bid,
>>> nothing more, and he's wasting taxpayer dollars doing it.
>>>
>>>
>> Probably true in both cases, but the poster claimed "I haven't seen ANY
>> big moves to impeach our current President - have you...???"
>>
>> I consider a 251 to 166 vote to be a big move, don't you?
>
> Big move? No. Grandstanding and worthless? Yes.
>

really. if you're gonna impeach, get er done or shut up. should he be
impeached?
possibly.



==============================================================================
TOPIC: The leeches are reaching for more
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c1f04e2aa1094da5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 2:49 pm
From: The Real Bev


Gordon wrote:

> Hoo Boy! The leeches are everywhere!

Just say no.

--
Cheers, Bev
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Todd Flanders' hobbies include being quiet on long rides,
clapping to songs and diabetes.

== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 3:13 pm
From: Gordon


terryc <newssixspam-spam@woa.com.au> wrote in
news:pan.2008.08.07.12.36.09.395017@woa.com.au:

> On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:01:14 +0200, Gordon wrote:
>
>> Back in the early '70's my father had a mortgage, an electric bill
>> a phone bill, a water bill and once a year we filled up the heating
oil
>> tank.
>> Sewer and garbage was paid from taxes.
>>
>> Today, I have a Mortgage, an electric bill, a phone bill,
>> a cell phone bill, an internet access bill, I could have
>> a cable TV bill, A water + sewer bill, a garbage collection
>> bill. Basicly, more services to pay for.
>
> These are essential.
Maybe not CATV.

>>
>> Of course it's not that simple.
>> Cable TV wants you to buy a priemium package,
>> Cell phone wants to tack on IM, chat, and data
>> packages,
>
> Those are not essential
Agree.


>
>> And then there are those web sites like Classmates.com
>> Facebook, Geneology.com, 2nd life, (and for my daughter)
>> Club penguine, Bratz, Petz.com, etc that want to
>> sell priemium membership.
>
> These are money wasters. You must have money to burn.

I'm not paying for any of these. I have better
things to spend my money on.

>
>>
>> Hoo Boy! The leeches are everywhere!
>
> If you watch the cents, the $$$ take care of themselves.
>
>

== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 3:36 pm
From: Seerialmom


On Aug 5, 9:01 pm, Gordon <go...@alltomyself.com> wrote:
> Back in the early '70's my father had a mortgage, an electric bill
> a phone bill, a water bill and once a year we filled up the heating oil
> tank.
> Sewer and garbage was paid from taxes.
>
> Today, I have a Mortgage, an electric bill, a phone bill,
> a cell phone bill, an internet access bill, I could have
> a cable TV bill, A water + sewer bill, a garbage collection
> bill. Basicly, more services to pay for.
>
> Of course it's not that simple.
> Cable TV wants you to buy a priemium package,
> Cell phone wants to tack on IM, chat, and data
> packages,
> And then there are those web sites like Classmates.com
> Facebook, Geneology.com, 2nd life, (and for my daughter)
> Club penguine, Bratz, Petz.com, etc that want to
> sell priemium membership.
>
> Hoo Boy!  The leeches are everywhere!

There were always companies that wanted people to buy from them;
nothing new here.
Some of those listed are actually better deals than they were in the
70's, for example the phone bill.
There was no such thing as "unlimited long distance". Back then you
paid for the phone line and could have unlimited local calling, but
most opted for either measured or even party lines to keep the cost
down (when you compared the cost to what the average wages were).
The only reason you "need" many of the things you mentioned are to
"fit in"; you'd be suprised how simple life can be when you disconnect
yourself from the wired community.

== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 4:36 pm
From: George Grapman


Seerialmom wrote:
> On Aug 5, 9:01 pm, Gordon <go...@alltomyself.com> wrote:
>> Back in the early '70's my father had a mortgage, an electric bill
>> a phone bill, a water bill and once a year we filled up the heating oil
>> tank.
>> Sewer and garbage was paid from taxes.
>>
>> Today, I have a Mortgage, an electric bill, a phone bill,
>> a cell phone bill, an internet access bill, I could have
>> a cable TV bill, A water + sewer bill, a garbage collection
>> bill. Basicly, more services to pay for.
>>
>> Of course it's not that simple.
>> Cable TV wants you to buy a priemium package,
>> Cell phone wants to tack on IM, chat, and data
>> packages,
>> And then there are those web sites like Classmates.com
>> Facebook, Geneology.com, 2nd life, (and for my daughter)
>> Club penguine, Bratz, Petz.com, etc that want to
>> sell priemium membership.
>>
>> Hoo Boy! The leeches are everywhere!
>
> There were always companies that wanted people to buy from them;
> nothing new here.
> Some of those listed are actually better deals than they were in the
> 70's, for example the phone bill.
> There was no such thing as "unlimited long distance". Back then you
> paid for the phone line and could have unlimited local calling, but
> most opted for either measured or even party lines to keep the cost
> down (when you compared the cost to what the average wages were).
> The only reason you "need" many of the things you mentioned are to
> "fit in"; you'd be suprised how simple life can be when you disconnect
> yourself from the wired community.

Not only was there no unlimited service there was also tiered
pricing. Cheapest calls were 11 p.m. to 8 a.m.. Next was 5-11p.m. and
daytime were the most expensive.
When I moved to CA from the east and my phone rang at 8:02 p.m.t was
usually a caller from there. Likewise I tried to call early in the
morning or on weekends. When was the last time you checked the time
before calling other than to to be sure you were not calling another
person to late/early?

== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:33 pm
From: Seerialmom


On Aug 7, 4:36 pm, George Grapman <sfgeo...@paccbell.net> wrote:
> Seerialmom wrote:
> > On Aug 5, 9:01 pm, Gordon <go...@alltomyself.com> wrote:
> >> Back in the early '70's my father had a mortgage, an electric bill
> >> a phone bill, a water bill and once a year we filled up the heating oil
> >> tank.
> >> Sewer and garbage was paid from taxes.
>
> >> Today, I have a Mortgage, an electric bill, a phone bill,
> >> a cell phone bill, an internet access bill, I could have
> >> a cable TV bill, A water + sewer bill, a garbage collection
> >> bill. Basicly, more services to pay for.
>
> >> Of course it's not that simple.
> >> Cable TV wants you to buy a priemium package,
> >> Cell phone wants to tack on IM, chat, and data
> >> packages,
> >> And then there are those web sites like Classmates.com
> >> Facebook, Geneology.com, 2nd life, (and for my daughter)
> >> Club penguine, Bratz, Petz.com, etc that want to
> >> sell priemium membership.
>
> >> Hoo Boy!  The leeches are everywhere!
>
> > There were always companies that wanted people to buy from them;
> > nothing new here.
> > Some of those listed are actually better deals than they were in the
> > 70's, for example the phone bill.
> > There was no such thing as "unlimited long distance".  Back then you
> > paid for the phone line and could have unlimited local calling, but
> > most opted for either measured or even party lines to keep the cost
> > down (when you compared the cost to what the average wages were).
> > The only reason you "need" many of the things you mentioned are to
> > "fit in"; you'd be suprised how simple life can be when you disconnect
> > yourself from the wired community.
>
>     Not only was there no unlimited service there was also tiered
> pricing. Cheapest calls were 11 p.m. to 8 a.m.. Next was 5-11p.m. and
> daytime  were the most expensive.
>    When I moved to CA from the east and my phone rang at 8:02 p.m.t was
> usually a caller from there. Likewise I tried to call early in the
> morning or on weekends. When was the last time you checked the time
> before calling other than to to be sure you were not calling another
> person to late/early?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Not at all these days. But I sure do remember making it a point to
take advantage of those "half price" long distance holidays. And how
many times would you run into "all circuits are busy" when making
those calls? Ah...those were the days!


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Part of frugal living may be spotting the next mess before it blind
sides you.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/82578bd2c1b6f6f9?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 3:09 pm
From: phil scott


On Aug 5, 8:15 am, Jonathan Grobe <gr...@netins.net> wrote:
> On 2008-08-03, phil scott <p...@philscott.net> wrote:> Say for instance you owe 400,000 dollars on a house now worth 150,000
> > dollars on the distressed market...and you are late with a mortgage
> > payment as your employer has announced lay offs...and your skill set
> > is retail sales clerk etc.
>
> Frugal people (especially people whose skill set is retail sales
> clerk) don't buy $400,000 plus houses.

many did in this area, including illegal aliens on welfare.

also many in the 'management' aspect of retail sales made a little
more
money, but the skill in a bad economy goes useless even as some
requiring
much more education go useless.

Phil scott
>
> --
> Jonathan Grobe Books  
> Browse our inventory of thousands of used books at:http://www.grobebooks.com


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Frugal ideas (on topic)
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b0fb633415061f1d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 3:33 pm
From: Gordon


jeeppintom@webtv.net (Tommy) wrote in news:18109-489B3C7C-558@storefull-
3113.bay.webtv.net:

> I'm curious to know some of your frugal ideals that you started. That
> is up, and running.
>
> TIA, Tommy.
>

- Owning one car.
- A used car, paid with cash.
- Using Public transportion.
- Walking to destinations up to 1 mile away.
- Sticking to the basics at the Grocery store.
- Shopping the Grocery Outlet and Bread Outlet.
- No Cable TV.
- Make my own Coffee
- Freeware Programs on the computer.
- Watch Priemium TV programing on the computer.
- Don't use VCR anymore to time shift programs,
All the network programs are available on line.
- Reduce the amount of trash going to the curb and
get a smaller garbage tip cart (Garbage fee is
lower for the smaller cart).
- Use cell phone for LD.
- USe M to M for LD since it is free.
- Use passive solar for heat in the winter (just open
the shades and let the sun shine in.
- Share baby clothes with other moms.

- And above all: Just live simply.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 4:45 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"Tommy" <jeeppintom@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:14870-489B5D85-332@storefull-3112.bay.webtv.net...
> Yea,,,, I see>>> you took the "to juice or not to juice" topic to the
> off topic.
>
> Thanks ;)
>
no, i don't think that was me. maybe, it was so long ago, but i don't think
i changed it.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:49 pm
From: phil scott


On Aug 7, 11:18 am, jeeppin...@webtv.net (Tommy) wrote:
> I'm curious to know some of your  frugal ideals that you started. That
> is up, and running.
>
> TIA, Tommy.

Motor home/ river boat living...very nice... no rent what so ever, and
as
plush as you care to make it...and freedom to travel abroad by simply
paying 100 dollars a month storage while you are away.

no ppty tax, gas expense is reduced by carrying a motorcycle or towing
a fuel efficient car.

doing ones business from the motorhome makes for ultra competitiveness
and expands the range of operations significantly... no commute.

Phil scott


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Some say 'Knowledge is power'... and a way to make a living.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b8fb9fc6e8757602?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:54 pm
From: phil scott


On Aug 7, 9:34 am, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "phil scott" <p...@philscott.net> wrote in message
>
> news:8c67cb38-189f-4ed8-a180-d7981877ba2f@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...> That prompted the following.
>
> snip
>
> > For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
> > fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
> > can operate as an engineer.
>
> dh is an engineer; what trade do you suggest he learn? :-)

I am a mech engr.. work for us got spotty as hell starting in 99...
one hit a year on a resume that used to get hundreds, and several
offers a year...so I did handyman work and got
an electrical and hvac contractors lic as I promoted my own freelance
engineering.

that has worked out well.

not easy though.


lacking the handyman work then later contracting Id of starved to
death.


the engineering background helps a lot with that type of work.


Phil scott

== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:12 pm
From: phil scott


On Aug 7, 9:34 am, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "phil scott" <p...@philscott.net> wrote in message
>
> news:8c67cb38-189f-4ed8-a180-d7981877ba2f@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...> That prompted the following.
>
> snip
>
> > For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
> > fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
> > can operate as an engineer.
>
> dh is an engineer; what trade do you suggest he learn? :-)

its up to him mon.


Trades by hourly rate in order:

Electrical controls, industrial, programmable,,PLC's etc pays $120++
per hour free lance... 50 or 60 dollars for a wage position. You have
to be sharp. (about half my work these days)

Electrical contracting ...industrial pays 75+ per hour.. thats just
wiring and simple motor controls

Home wiring a lot less, can bottom out in the 40 dollar range free
lance.


for mech engrs.

HVAC commcl ind, service pays 95+.. but its hard work.
Residential hvac a lot less 75 or less


handyman work in homes pays about 50 dollars an hour.
thats anything ... fixing sinks, fences, doors and toilets


Those are west coast rates... lower as you go inland, bottom is in
Florida, parts of texas and california not much better... (inland
areas) (rates are less than a third of california's best locations.
(coastal areas, SF, LA, Portland etc)

**
Marketing most efficient by Craigs list and also cold calling
businesses
with a card or sticker... 8 hours of cold calling will produce about
400
dollars of work directly arranged that day, and about 2,000 on average
over
the next month or so.

Cold calling one day a week for a few months will have you flush with
more work than
you and two helpers can do.... those stats will go south some as the
economy tanks.

***
Engineering in this area on a wage pays between 25 dollars and 40
dollars an hour with the 40 dollar jobs getting scarce fast unless you
are established manager.. not too many of those
these days, they max at about 60 dollars an hour average... rare
specialties higher of course.

those are 10-12 hours per day jobs if you count the hour wasted for
lunch and time it takes to
put on the monkey suit properly and drive to work. (with trade work
you bill for the travel time).


Phil scott


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:27 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"phil scott" <phil@philscott.net> wrote in message
news:48cf80db-c3bd-4df8-aeb5-5ef2faad563f@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 7, 9:34 am, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "phil scott" <p...@philscott.net> wrote in message
>
> news:8c67cb38-189f-4ed8-a180-d7981877ba2f@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...>
> That prompted the following.
>
> snip
>
> > For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
> > fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
> > can operate as an engineer.
>
> dh is an engineer; what trade do you suggest he learn? :-)

I am a mech engr.. work for us got spotty as hell starting in 99...
one hit a year on a resume that used to get hundreds, and several
offers a year...so I did handyman work and got
an electrical and hvac contractors lic as I promoted my own freelance
engineering.

that has worked out well.

not easy though.


lacking the handyman work then later contracting Id of starved to
death.


the engineering background helps a lot with that type of work.


yeah, dh is really handy with electrical, plumbing, carpentry, older cars
(new fangled things almost always have to be brought to a mechanic these
days), small engines sorta stuff


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:31 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"phil scott" <phil@philscott.net> wrote in message
news:44f1c1be-d9a5-48b0-9ecf-67f72ee4f601@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 7, 9:34 am, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> "phil scott" <p...@philscott.net> wrote in message
>
> news:8c67cb38-189f-4ed8-a180-d7981877ba2f@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...>
> That prompted the following.
>
> snip
>
> > For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
> > fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
> > can operate as an engineer.
>
> dh is an engineer; what trade do you suggest he learn? :-)

its up to him mon.


Trades by hourly rate in order:

Electrical controls, industrial, programmable,,PLC's etc pays $120++
per hour free lance... 50 or 60 dollars for a wage position. You have
to be sharp. (about half my work these days)

Electrical contracting ...industrial pays 75+ per hour.. thats just
wiring and simple motor controls

Home wiring a lot less, can bottom out in the 40 dollar range free
lance.

he's a broadcast engineer, but was an electronics tech in the navy, so
he's well versed in both computers and electrical.


for mech engrs.

HVAC commcl ind, service pays 95+.. but its hard work.
Residential hvac a lot less 75 or less

oldest son did a/c, but is now self employed with division
8 commercial installations. still does a little a/c on the side
to keep up.

handyman work in homes pays about 50 dollars an hour.
thats anything ... fixing sinks, fences, doors and toilets

that's dh.


Those are west coast rates... lower as you go inland, bottom is in
Florida, parts of texas and california not much better... (inland
areas) (rates are less than a third of california's best locations.
(coastal areas, SF, LA, Portland etc)

pa and sc

**
Marketing most efficient by Craigs list and also cold calling
businesses
with a card or sticker... 8 hours of cold calling will produce about
400
dollars of work directly arranged that day, and about 2,000 on average
over
the next month or so.

Cold calling one day a week for a few months will have you flush with
more work than
you and two helpers can do.... those stats will go south some as the
economy tanks.

***
Engineering in this area on a wage pays between 25 dollars and 40
dollars an hour with the 40 dollar jobs getting scarce fast unless you
are established manager.. not too many of those
these days, they max at about 60 dollars an hour average... rare
specialties higher of course.

those are 10-12 hours per day jobs if you count the hour wasted for
lunch and time it takes to
put on the monkey suit properly and drive to work. (with trade work
you bill for the travel time).


you really are an engineer, aren't you? they tend to be extremely
focused, which is a good thing :)


Phil scott


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 7:31 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"phil scott" <phil@philscott.net> wrote in message
news:44f1c1be-d9a5-48b0-9ecf-67f72ee4f601@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 7, 9:34 am, "AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <der...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

snip

well thanks for all this stuff. i'll hang onto it for when dh is done
playing tv.



==============================================================================
TOPIC: Free $100 In Gas at Your Favorite Station
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c804112fbe31d284?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:56 pm
From: nosi7jj5


I just discovered this new site that's giving away a $100 gas voucher,
for free!

Can you believe the price of gas these days?

In my area it's currently over $4.75 per gallon, and all signs point
to it going even higher, very soon. I remember the days when gas used
to cost $0.99 per gallon, but those days are long gone.


This site delivers on its promise too, and you can receive your gas
voucher for the gas station of your choice.

Here's how it works:

1. You visit www.ebusinesswiz.com/freegascard
2. You complete one of their participating offers (I completed mine
in 5 minutes).
3. You get your free $100 gas voucher!

Simple as that.

I'm taking the $100 I'm saving on gas and taking my family out to a
nice dinner. What will you do with your $100?

Don't miss out on this offer. There's no telling when they'll take it
down.

Visit www.ebusinesswiz.com/freegascard and get your free $100 gas
voucher today!

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en

26 new messages in 7 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Useful site for buying/selling - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/e49ce57b5a2ef854?hl=en
* The leeches are reaching for more - 7 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c1f04e2aa1094da5?hl=en
* does anybody here know anything abou freecycle - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/af17f8e5c05bfdd7?hl=en
* Visa Withdrawn - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb5d13e1ee6e8777?hl=en
* To juice or not. - 10 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb065ec0061ab7cd?hl=en
* Some say 'Knowledge is power'... and a way to make a living. - 2 messages, 2
authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b8fb9fc6e8757602?hl=en
* Frugal ideas - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b0fb633415061f1d?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Useful site for buying/selling
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/e49ce57b5a2ef854?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Aug 6 2008 11:41 pm
From: Flora


Hello everyone,

I found an interesting site for buying and selling products; where
sellers are provided a free store and buyers can do a color
search.This site seems very interesting. You may want to check out
this site. http://www.silkfair.com/?psrc=xxxxx

Thanks

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 2:54 am
From: clams_casino


Flora wrote:

>Hello everyone,
>
>I found an interesting site for buying and selling
>
>

You are bragging about finding your own site?

What happened? layeredtech.com drop your site for spamming? I see
that abuse@cyberverse.com is now where to complain about your spam.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: The leeches are reaching for more
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/c1f04e2aa1094da5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 2:45 am
From: clams_casino


Coffee's For Closers wrote:

>
>The water/sewer and rubbish costs being billed separately doesn't
>mean, in and of itself, that you are paying more (although with
>inflation you are.)
>
>
>

Replacing taxes as fees is an old trick. It's a gimmick used by some
towns to hide real tax levels.

For about half the population, it probably doesn't matter much. For
those who deduct taxes via long form, however, it's a costly practice.

When I lived the "low tax" state of TN, it seemed like every service
was a fee, from trash pick up to library membership. We even had a
water fee (double the water bill) because we lived in the county (where
taxes were "lower" than the adjacent city).

== 2 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:36 am
From: terryc


On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:01:14 +0200, Gordon wrote:

> Back in the early '70's my father had a mortgage, an electric bill
> a phone bill, a water bill and once a year we filled up the heating oil
> tank.
> Sewer and garbage was paid from taxes.
>
> Today, I have a Mortgage, an electric bill, a phone bill,
> a cell phone bill, an internet access bill, I could have
> a cable TV bill, A water + sewer bill, a garbage collection
> bill. Basicly, more services to pay for.

These are essential.
>
> Of course it's not that simple.
> Cable TV wants you to buy a priemium package,
> Cell phone wants to tack on IM, chat, and data
> packages,

Those are not essential

> And then there are those web sites like Classmates.com
> Facebook, Geneology.com, 2nd life, (and for my daughter)
> Club penguine, Bratz, Petz.com, etc that want to
> sell priemium membership.

These are money wasters. You must have money to burn.

>
> Hoo Boy! The leeches are everywhere!

If you watch the cents, the $$$ take care of themselves.

== 3 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 8:41 am
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
news:ovzmk.7132$3l5.6539@newsfe06.iad...
> Coffee's For Closers wrote:
>
>>
>>The water/sewer and rubbish costs being billed separately doesn't mean, in
>>and of itself, that you are paying more (although with inflation you are.)
>
> Replacing taxes as fees is an old trick. It's a gimmick used by some towns
> to hide real tax levels.

we used to pay our garbage separately, but because people weren't paying,
it was bundled in with our taxes.
>
> For about half the population, it probably doesn't matter much. For those
> who deduct taxes via long form, however, it's a costly practice.

you're allowed to deduct your taxes, but you have to take out the part
that is paid for things like water, sewer, and trash removal. our tax
bill lists them out separately. you're NOT allowed to deduct any part of
your tax bill that is for those types of items. it's in the irs code; read
it myself.

> When I lived the "low tax" state of TN, it seemed like every service was
> a fee, from trash pick up to library membership. We even had a water fee
> (double the water bill) because we lived in the county (where taxes were
> "lower" than the adjacent city).

we have library taxes, but it's not a membership. it's just the part of
your
taxes that go to support the library. there's also the part that goes for
fire protection and schools. i think some places also have ambulance.


== 4 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 12:06 pm
From: clams_casino


AllEmailDeletedImmediately wrote:

>"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
>news:ovzmk.7132$3l5.6539@newsfe06.iad...
>
>
>>Coffee's For Closers wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The water/sewer and rubbish costs being billed separately doesn't mean, in
>>>and of itself, that you are paying more (although with inflation you are.)
>>>
>>>
>>Replacing taxes as fees is an old trick. It's a gimmick used by some towns
>>to hide real tax levels.
>>
>>
>
>we used to pay our garbage separately, but because people weren't paying,
>it was bundled in with our taxes.
>
>
>>For about half the population, it probably doesn't matter much. For those
>>who deduct taxes via long form, however, it's a costly practice.
>>
>>
>
>you're allowed to deduct your taxes, but you have to take out the part
>that is paid for things like water, sewer, and trash removal. our tax
>bill lists them out separately. you're NOT allowed to deduct any part of
>your tax bill that is for those types of items. it's in the irs code; read
>it myself.
>
>
>

If they break it out as a fee, it's not deductible. We have no charge
trash pickup, free library usage, etc that's part of our taxes - not
broken out as a fee.

It depends where you live. In some areas, taxes cover a lot of
services. In other places, they report (artificially) lower taxes by
charging services as fees.


== 5 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 12:25 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
news:2JHmk.4332$i15.2288@newsfe01.iad...
> AllEmailDeletedImmediately wrote:
>
>>"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
>>news:ovzmk.7132$3l5.6539@newsfe06.iad...
>>
>>>Coffee's For Closers wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The water/sewer and rubbish costs being billed separately doesn't mean,
>>>>in and of itself, that you are paying more (although with inflation you
>>>>are.)
>>>>
>>>Replacing taxes as fees is an old trick. It's a gimmick used by some
>>>towns to hide real tax levels.
>>>
>>
>>we used to pay our garbage separately, but because people weren't paying,
>>it was bundled in with our taxes.
>>
>>>For about half the population, it probably doesn't matter much. For
>>>those who deduct taxes via long form, however, it's a costly practice.
>>>
>>
>>you're allowed to deduct your taxes, but you have to take out the part
>>that is paid for things like water, sewer, and trash removal. our tax
>>bill lists them out separately. you're NOT allowed to deduct any part of
>>your tax bill that is for those types of items. it's in the irs code;
>>read it myself.
>>
>>
>
> If they break it out as a fee, it's not deductible. We have no charge
> trash pickup, free library usage, etc that's part of our taxes - not
> broken out as a fee.

better check with the irs on that. i'm 99.99% positive that you have to
estimate the costs even if it's not broken out. i seem to remember not
knowing that and deducting everything the first yr we lived here (it
being the first house we owned that had the sewer in the tax bill), and then
finding out that i should have estimated the amt of taxes that were going
for the sewer charges (we pay water, and at that time, garbage, separately)
and not deduct that amt. the difference in taxes would have been that i'da
owed maybe 10.00 more, so i didn't see the point in bring all that to the
irs's attention and let it slide that first yr.

and that's what i did until the boro started pulling it out separately. at
which time i found out my estimates were a little low as i was using what i
had been paying at the house we had lived in before we moved, but it was off
by less than 5.00/mon. the charges for fire, ambulance, school, library,
etc are deductible, because everyone pretty much pays taxes for those
things.

it's been a few yrs, and my brain isn't what it used to be. but do call the
irs to find out for sure.


== 6 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 12:58 pm
From: clams_casino


AllEmailDeletedImmediately wrote:

>better check with the irs on that. i'm 99.99% positive that you have to
>estimate the costs even if it's not broken out. i seem to remember not
>knowing that and deducting everything the first yr we lived here (it
>being the first house we owned that had the sewer in the tax bill), and then
>finding out that i should have estimated the amt of taxes that were going
>for the sewer charges (we pay water, and at that time, garbage, separately)
>and not deduct that amt. the difference in taxes would have been that i'da
>owed maybe 10.00 more, so i didn't see the point in bring all that to the
>irs's attention and let it slide that first yr.
>
>and that's what i did until the boro started pulling it out separately. at
>which time i found out my estimates were a little low as i was using what i
>had been paying at the house we had lived in before we moved, but it was off
>by less than 5.00/mon. the charges for fire, ambulance, school, library,
>etc are deductible, because everyone pretty much pays taxes for those
>things.
>
>it's been a few yrs, and my brain isn't what it used to be. but do call the
>irs to find out for sure.
>
>

Quote from Publication 17


"An itemized charge for services assessed against specific property or
certain people is not a tax, even if the charge is paid to the taxing
authority. For example, you cannot deduct the charge as a real estate
tax if it is:

*

A unit fee for the delivery of a service (such as a $5 fee charged
for every 1,000 gallons of water you use),

*

A periodic charge for a residential service (such as a $20 per
month or $240 annual fee charged to each homeowner for trash
collection), or

*

A flat fee charged for a single service provided by your
government (such as a $30 charge for mowing your lawn because it
was allowed to grow higher than permitted under your local
ordinance)."


>
>
>
"You must look at your real estate tax bill to determine if any
nondeductible itemized charges, such as those listed above, are included
in the bill. Exception. Service charges used to maintain or improve
services (such as trash collection or police and fire protection) are
deductible as real estate taxes if:

*

The fees or charges are imposed at a like rate against all
property in the taxing jurisdiction,

*

The funds collected are not earmarked; instead, they are
commingled with general revenue funds, and

*

Funds used to maintain or improve services are not limited to or
determined by the amount of these fees or charges collected."

*

== 7 of 7 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:38 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"

"clams_casino" <PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote in message
news:otImk.13278$KZ.3769@newsfe03.iad...

snip
> Quote from Publication 17
>
>
> "An itemized charge for services assessed against specific property or
> certain people is not a tax, even if the charge is paid to the taxing
> authority. For example, you cannot deduct the charge as a real estate tax
> if it is:
>
> A unit fee for the delivery of a service (such as a $5 fee charged
> for every 1,000 gallons of water you use),
>

> A periodic charge for a residential service (such as a $20 per
> month or $240 annual fee charged to each homeowner for trash
> collection), or
>
> *

that would include a $360 annual fee for sewer and/or water and a $600 annal
fee for trash pu pd to a private company.


> "You must look at your real estate tax bill to determine if any
> nondeductible itemized charges, such as those listed above, are included
> in the bill. Exception. Service charges used to maintain or improve
> services (such as trash collection or police and fire protection) are
> deductible as real estate taxes if:

> The fees or charges are imposed at a like rate against all
> property in the taxing jurisdiction,
>
> The funds collected are not earmarked; instead, they are
> commingled with general revenue funds, and

i have no idea if my boro does this. they have to pay the private trash
company to pu trash. it's not provided by the boro. i don't know about
the
sewer and who supplies that. i know water is provided by a private utility
that state regulated and we pay that ourselves.
>
> Funds used to maintain or improve services are not limited to or
> determined by the amount of these fees or charges collected."


the trash fees collected maintain and improve nothing having to do with the
boro. all goes to the private trash company. maybe the boro gets to skim
a little to ensure that all residents pay the trash company; you pay even if
no one is living in the house.

sounds like you'd need a cpa to figure this thing out.



==============================================================================
TOPIC: does anybody here know anything abou freecycle
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/af17f8e5c05bfdd7?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 5:38 am
From: terryc


On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 08:58:53 -0700, A Veteran wrote:


> I tried both. seems Freecycle flooded my e-mail box with so many items,

Er, get a better mailer. One that allows you to presort incoming mail
into different folders. Pan, thunderbird, etc


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Visa Withdrawn
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb5d13e1ee6e8777?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 6:34 am
From: Al Bundy


PaPaPeng wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 06:41:44 -0400, Shawn Hirn <srhi@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <pboi94dqevjj0fmg5cmpb3qp53k6bj2nk3@4ax.com>,
> > PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Boycott Payback. Those 2 Britons and 2 Americans who unfurled a
> >> "Tibet is Free" bannewr should be fined and deported from Beijing
> >> immediately. Banned from visiting China for life too.
> >
> >Wrong newsgroup.
>
> Yep. I was wondering where this post went.

No problem. We're willing to cut you a break. We know you've been
cramming for your finals for a few years now.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: To juice or not.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/bb065ec0061ab7cd?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 8:51 am
From: blake murphy


On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:09:39 -0400, clams_casino wrote:

> Pan wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:38:54 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>You mean, IKYABWAI. Dad.
>>>
>>>Now then, I realize you're bitter because you're looking at EIGHT years of
>>>Democratic administrations, but if we could take EIGHT years of the First
>>>Chimp, you can take eight years of our guy.
>>>
>>>And even if you can't, you have to.
>>>
>>>*cackle*
>>>
>>>
>>
>>Don't cackle, until after the election, and if your right I will be
>>bitter, and fight thru my state's rep's, to stop what I can.
>>
>>And again the hate Bush statement, "first chimp".
>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
>>passed?
>>
>>
>
> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?

he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.

your pal,
blake

== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 8:53 am
From: blake murphy


On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:09:09 -0500, Gregory Morrow wrote:

> clams_casino wrote:
>
>> Pan wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:38:54 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>You mean, IKYABWAI. Dad.
>>>>
>>>>Now then, I realize you're bitter because you're looking at EIGHT years
> of
>>>>Democratic administrations, but if we could take EIGHT years of the
> First
>>>>Chimp, you can take eight years of our guy.
>>>>
>>>>And even if you can't, you have to.
>>>>
>>>>*cackle*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>Don't cackle, until after the election, and if your right I will be
>>>bitter, and fight thru my state's rep's, to stop what I can.
>>>
>>>And again the hate Bush statement, "first chimp".
>>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
>>>passed?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>
>
> Restoring *dignity* to the office of the Presidency after the *severe*
> damage that Clintoon did to the office...???

<derisive snort>

you mean english as a second (or third) language george? you gotta be
shittin' me.

blake

== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 10:31 am
From: Pan


On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:09:39 -0400, clams_casino
<PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote:


>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
>>passed?
>>
>>
>
>You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?

No further attacks on the U.S.A. since 9/11

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 10:33 am
From: Pan


On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
<blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:


>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>
>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
>
>your pal,
>blake


And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 10:36 am
From: Pan


On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:04:36 GMT, blake murphy
<blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:


>
>but mccain is a foreign-policy ace because he speaks fluent gibberish!
>well, sometimes it's fluent.
>
>your pal,
>barry

And yet McCain is rated much higher on foreign policy, that Obama

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 11:57 am
From: clams_casino


Pan wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:09:39 -0400, clams_casino
><PeterGriffin@DrunkinClam.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
>>>passed?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>>
>>
>
>No further attacks on the U.S.A. since 9/11
>
>

No elephants in my backyard, the moon still shows up occasionally and
McDonalds still sells a $1 double cheeseburger.

GW's a miracle man.

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 12:01 pm
From: clams_casino


Pan wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:04:36 GMT, blake murphy
><blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>but mccain is a foreign-policy ace because he speaks fluent gibberish!
>>well, sometimes it's fluent.
>>
>>your pal,
>>barry
>>
>>
>
>And yet McCain is rated much higher on foreign policy, that Obama
>
>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NC0Y7zMcn_4


and

McCain asserted that "I can tell you that it is succeeding. I can look
you in the eye and tell you it's succeeding. We have drawn down to
pre-surge levels. Basra, Mosul and now Sadr City are quiet and it's long
and it's hard and it's tough and there will be setbacks."

In fact, as the Obama campaign was quick to point out, the troop level
in Iraq is at about 155,000 right now, well above the 130,000 that would
mark a return to pre-surge levels.


Perhaps he's just a bit forgetful - it does happen when one ages.


== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:48 pm
From: "Gregory Morrow"

blake murphy wrote:

> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 15:09:09 -0500, Gregory Morrow wrote:
>
> > clams_casino wrote:
> >
> >> Pan wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 18:38:54 -0400, "cybercat" <cyberpurrs@yahoo.com>
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>You mean, IKYABWAI. Dad.
> >>>>
> >>>>Now then, I realize you're bitter because you're looking at EIGHT
years
> > of
> >>>>Democratic administrations, but if we could take EIGHT years of the
> > First
> >>>>Chimp, you can take eight years of our guy.
> >>>>
> >>>>And even if you can't, you have to.
> >>>>
> >>>>*cackle*
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Don't cackle, until after the election, and if your right I will be
> >>>bitter, and fight thru my state's rep's, to stop what I can.
> >>>
> >>>And again the hate Bush statement, "first chimp".
> >>>Could you name a piece of legislation, that you man has initiated, and
> >>>passed?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
> >
> >
> > Restoring *dignity* to the office of the Presidency after the *severe*
> > damage that Clintoon did to the office...???
>
> <derisive snort>
>
> you mean english as a second (or third) language george? you gotta be
> shittin' me.


I'm not talkin' about "style" blake...

Georgie Porgie has not "stained" the office of the presidency with personal
scandal as Bill Clintoon did...no Monica, no "blue dress", no witchity
Hillary throwin' stuff around the White House at all hours...no YEARS wasted
parsing adolescent and self - destructive Billy Clintoon's behaviours...

I haven't seen ANY big moves to impeach our current President - have
you...???


--
Best
Greg


== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:44 pm
From: "cybercat"

"Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dgcm945t5hmc14ea1gqlfj8aotvssrcni9@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 06 Aug 2008 16:04:36 GMT, blake murphy
> <blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>but mccain is a foreign-policy ace because he speaks fluent gibberish!
>>well, sometimes it's fluent.
>>
>>your pal,
>>barry
>
> And yet McCain is rated much higher on foreign policy, that Obama

It's the knight in Monty Python's "Holy Grail" who has lost the contest and
had his arms and legs reduced to stumps, thumping around saying, "Come on,
come on, I'm not finished yet, come over here and I'll bite your kneecaps
off."

lol

I'll be happy to discuss this with all of you charming motherfuckers after
the election.

HA HA HA!


== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:45 pm
From: "cybercat"

"Pan" <ohco@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:adcm949ucu80cmbho6hfc6s58vm8urlu3a@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 07 Aug 2008 15:51:01 GMT, blake murphy
> <blakepmNOTTHIS@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>>> You go first. Can you name a positive Bush (GW) achievement ?
>>
>>he managed to make richard nixon look pretty good in retrospect.
>>
>>your pal,
>>blake
>
>
> And he is way better then Carter and Clinton.

Yes indeed, you can tell by how much better shape the nation is in than when
Clinton was president. Jesus. What a moron you are.



==============================================================================
TOPIC: Some say 'Knowledge is power'... and a way to make a living.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b8fb9fc6e8757602?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 9:17 am
From: phil scott


That prompted the following.

Knowledge is indeed power, thats what I have sought..(and
capability)..and its been what power I have, and it has withstood many
challenges... it comes through.


The culture broadly however, especially lately forfeits knowledge for
a job, or investment, cash or whatever... and that too is power, but
of an entirely different sort. One can be deprived of it.

Cash, assets or position is a weak sort of power, and when knowledge
or integrity or insight is forfeited for it ....the result is a net
weakness... when the money or position goes the person has no-thing,
and the self is in a diminished circumstance due to no understanding,
or worse having swallowed deception... the person has no contribution
to make the larger whole... or worse his contribution is negative,
various forms of insanity etc.


Real power is insight, understanding, and when capability are added to
that mix, it is true viability.... and it lends viability to others..
and that expands.


**

Errors can be made in the viability aspect by failure to match ones
insight with his capability.


For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
can operate as an engineer.

If you move to pet grooming you loose the benefit.. the power is
lost.. you will be competing against powerless people with no insight
or capability in a starvation sort of market.

**

It seems then that understanding is a prerequisite to a good life, and
all else of actual validity follows that.... this is true it seems
even if riches are sacrificed in the process.


Phil scott

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 9:34 am
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"phil scott" <phil@philscott.net> wrote in message
news:8c67cb38-189f-4ed8-a180-d7981877ba2f@r15g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> That prompted the following.
snip

> For example is you are an engineer and become a tradesman you get a
> fairly good match of insight and capability.. or even better if you
> can operate as an engineer.

dh is an engineer; what trade do you suggest he learn? :-)



==============================================================================
TOPIC: Frugal ideas
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/browse_thread/thread/b0fb633415061f1d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 11:18 am
From: jeeppintom@webtv.net (Tommy)


I'm curious to know some of your frugal ideals that you started. That
is up, and running.

TIA, Tommy.

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 12:29 pm
From: "AllEmailDeletedImmediately"


"Tommy" <jeeppintom@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:18109-489B3C7C-558@storefull-3113.bay.webtv.net...
> I'm curious to know some of your frugal ideals that you started. That
> is up, and running.
>
> TIA, Tommy.

well, tommy, contrary to the title of this newgroup, you've come to the
wrong place. only off topic discussions are allowed here. just take a
look around. :-)

----------------------
"I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just; that His justice
cannot sleep forever."--Thomas Jefferson

"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide
everything." -- Josef V. Stalin

www.myspace.com/bodybuildinggranny

heavy on the country music. if you don't like country, scroll down for
some surprises.>
>


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Aug 7 2008 1:39 pm
From: jeeppintom@webtv.net (Tommy)


Yea,,,, I see>>> you took the "to juice or not to juice" topic to the
off topic.

Thanks ;)

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en