Thursday, January 13, 2011

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 3 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Buying a new mattress and Ikea - 21 messages, 17 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en
* The Dentist's bum rush? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/74c07052a7943055?hl=en
* Is somebody responsible for Climate Change? - 3 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b32c9d8786296ac3?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Buying a new mattress and Ikea
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 7:15 am
From: "Mr Pounder"

"john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is
> a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress
> pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.

Stick a 3 before your �60 and you will get something 1/2 decent.

Mr Pounder
>
>
>


== 2 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 7:42 am
From: Bod


On 13/01/2011 15:15, Mr Pounder wrote:
> "john brook"<bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
>> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>>
>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
>> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is
>> a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress
>> pad.
>>
>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
>> elswhere? Thanks.
>
> Stick a 3 before your �60 and you will get something 1/2 decent.
>
> Mr Pounder
>>
>>
>>
>
>
I can only but agree with that.

--
Bod


== 3 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 7:54 am
From: "Mr Pounder"

"Bod" <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
news:8p8kqaFefrU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 13/01/2011 15:15, Mr Pounder wrote:
>> "john brook"<bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it
>>> so
>>> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring
>>> cleaning.
>>>
>>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
>>> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>>> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm
>>> is
>>> a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a
>>> mattress
>>> pad.
>>>
>>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
>>> elswhere? Thanks.
>>
>> Stick a 3 before your �60 and you will get something 1/2 decent.
>>
>> Mr Pounder
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> I can only but agree with that.
>
> --
> Bod

You are not allowed to agree with me.
I've had enough!

Bod reported to abuse@somewhere.co.uk

>


== 4 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 8:33 am
From: "Mr Pounder"

"Michaelangelo" <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:8p82lrF6ltU1@mid.individual.net...
> Tim Streater burst on the scene, and said:
>
>> [1] Prolly a bit like the wooden beds that WW2 prisoners slept on, where
>> they took the slats out to use for escape tunnel support.
>
> If you require support in your escape tunnel I would suggest that you use
> the orthopaedic mattress rather than the wooden slats.
>
> --
> Michaelangelo
> No good deed goes unpunished
>
> Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
> www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
> www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel

Some people lurk in your group.

Mr Pounder
>
>
>


== 5 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 8:36 am
From: "Foxy at Work"


Mr Pounder wrote:
> "Michaelangelo" <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote in message
> news:8p82lrF6ltU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Tim Streater burst on the scene, and said:
>>
>>> [1] Prolly a bit like the wooden beds that WW2 prisoners slept on,
>>> where they took the slats out to use for escape tunnel support.
>>
>> If you require support in your escape tunnel I would suggest that
>> you use the orthopaedic mattress rather than the wooden slats.
>>
>> --
>> Michaelangelo
>> No good deed goes unpunished
>>
>> Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
>> www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
>> www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel
>
> Some people lurk in your group.
>
> Mr Pounder

Lurkers are welcome. We don't even mind them "chipping in" now and then :)

Jen


== 6 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 9:11 am
From: "john brook"

"Mr Pounder" <MrPounder@RationalThought.com> wrote in message
news:MeFXo.2988$NG3.2617@newsfe22.ams2...
>
> "Bod" <bodron57@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:8p8kqaFefrU1@mid.individual.net...
>> On 13/01/2011 15:15, Mr Pounder wrote:
>>> "john brook"<bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
>>> news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>>>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it
>>>> so
>>>> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring
>>>> cleaning.
>>>>
>>>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
>>>> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>>>> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm
>>>> is
>>>> a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a
>>>> mattress
>>>> pad.
>>>>
>>>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
>>>> elswhere? Thanks.
>>>
====================================================================================

Looks like it's easier to live with the hills and valleys. After all
providing i'm in the valley it's not to bad. A bit hammock like i
suppose.....


== 7 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 9:35 am
From: "Rod Speed"


Richard Tobin wrote
> Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote

>>>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding
>>>> shops and get advice from people who know.

>>> Other customers, you mean?

>> Staff.

> What would people who know anything be doing working in a bed shop?

They'd obviously know how many customers have a problem with a mattress they flogged.

And whether those who bought 10cm thick foam mattresses complained
about them a lot more than those who bought the thicker ones etc.


== 8 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 10:12 am
From: Dave Starling


On Jan 13, 5:11 pm, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:

> >>>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> >>>> 200x140x10cm for 60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a

> >>>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> >>>> elswhere?  Thanks.
>
> Looks like it's easier to live with the hills and valleys. After all
> providing i'm in the valley it's not to bad. A bit hammock like i
> suppose
John - if its any good, I was in an Ikea earlier for a different
reason but ended up looking at the mattresses as my own mattress has
ended up with one large valley in the middle :( They have lots of
varieties from the 4 cm thick ones up to the pocket sprung (Hemvdek?)
for about £200. That looked good on the cross section and is about
36cm deep but wow, it was extremely firm to lay on. The softer/medium
mattresses looked like two big slabs of 10cm foam glued together. I've
heard people saying the memory foam mattresses end up making you
sweaty during sleep and perhaps moreso during other activities.

I think pocket sprung is the way to go and I can only guess the way is
to trudge around the bed shops and test them. Buying mattresses off
the internet seems risky if they end up either too firm or too soft
for your liking.

Dave.


== 9 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 10:33 am
From: Tim Streater


In article
<8d8c1086-be3c-4c4e-93e0-383f561d9423@k30g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
Dave Starling <dvstarling@googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Jan 13, 5:11�pm, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:
>
> > >>>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> > >>>> 200x140x10cm for 60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>
> > >>>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> > >>>> elswhere? �Thanks.
> >
> > Looks like it's easier to live with the hills and valleys. After all
> > providing i'm in the valley it's not to bad. A bit hammock like i
> > suppose
> John - if its any good, I was in an Ikea earlier for a different
> reason but ended up looking at the mattresses as my own mattress has
> ended up with one large valley in the middle :( They have lots of
> varieties from the 4 cm thick ones up to the pocket sprung (Hemvdek?)
> for about �200. That looked good on the cross section and is about
> 36cm deep but wow, it was extremely firm to lay on. The softer/medium
> mattresses looked like two big slabs of 10cm foam glued together. I've
> heard people saying the memory foam mattresses end up making you
> sweaty during sleep and perhaps moreso during other activities.

I've never had this ahem problem in the 30 years I've had mine.

--
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689


== 10 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 11:40 am
From: Tony Bryer


On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:11:42 -0800 (PST) Tabby wrote :
> I wouldnt even look at Ikea for mattresses. Had very satisfactory
> experience with M&S. Cheap mattresses arent worth buying, even if
> you're poor, as they dont last. A good mattress does.

Mine here came from Ikea and is fine. They do a whole range, prices here
from $60 (�39) to $949 (�612). I agree that very cheap is probably going
to be a bad buy unless for a rarely used spare bed.

--
Tony Bryer, Greentram: 'Software to build on' Melbourne, Australia
www.superbeam.co.uk www.eurobeam.co.uk www.greentram.com

== 11 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 11:39 am
From: John Williamson


Rod Speed wrote:
> Richard Tobin wrote
>> Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote
>
>>>>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding
>>>>> shops and get advice from people who know.
>
>>>> Other customers, you mean?
>
>>> Staff.
>
>> What would people who know anything be doing working in a bed shop?
>
> They'd obviously know how many customers have a problem with a mattress they flogged.
>
> And whether those who bought 10cm thick foam mattresses complained
> about them a lot more than those who bought the thicker ones etc.
>
>
I stay in a lot of cheap hotels. The worst mattresses are the foam ones
in cheap French chains, the best in Premier Inn in the UK. Maybe ask
them where they get theirs from?

--
Tciao for Now!

John.


== 12 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:01 pm
From: John Rumm


On 13/01/2011 12:18, Andy Dingley wrote:

> My own favourite mattresses aren't cheap, but they do solve these
> problems: _latex_ foam (i.e. natural rubber), not PU. It comes in
> sheets and is cut to any size, so you can make it fit an Ikea
> bedframe. Comfort is also brilliant - better even than viscoelastic
> foams like Tempur.

Do you recommend and suppliers of latex mattresses or for that matter
just the foam cut to size?

--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/


== 13 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:15 pm
From: dmc@puffin. (D.M.Chapman)


In article <8p92ncF69hU2@mid.individual.net>,
John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

>I stay in a lot of cheap hotels. The worst mattresses are the foam ones
>in cheap French chains, the best in Premier Inn in the UK. Maybe ask
>them where they get theirs from?


I agree - premier inn beds are pretty good. Better than many more expensive
hotels IMO.

http://www.premierinn.com/en/why/rooms.html

"King-size Hypnos beds"

http://www.hypnosbeds.com/

Not cheap...

Darren

== 14 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:27 pm
From: Andy Dingley


On Jan 13, 9:01 pm, John Rumm <see.my.signat...@nowhere.null> wrote:

> Do you recommend and suppliers of latex mattresses or for that matter
> just the foam cut to size?

There are a couple, just Google - mine came from some bunch up in
Yorkshire. I've also used Foam For Comfort for chair squabs (I make
chairs). I think the stuff is made in 2" sheets, which are then glued
up thicker, so you can have hard/soft as you like. They sew you up a
zipped mattress cover, as otherwise the stuff would erode on the
corners. For chairs I just upholster over it.


== 15 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:36 pm
From: Vandy Terre


On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 02:13:41 -0800 (PST), harry <haroldhrmtg@aol.com> wrote:

>If you are talking about "memory foam" an aspect not realised is that
>they are very hot (and sweaty). This because compared with a standard
>mattress they are very good insulation. When you think, there is only
>a very thin layer on a standard spring mattress. And if you ever want
>to "wash " it, you can look out. Best done on the driveway .

I agree that 'memory foam' is not a comfortable mattress. I enjoy a good foam
mattress. I really find innerspring mattresses uncomfortable and noisy (they
tend to ping when you move, okay most folks can't hear it, I can). I have an
old 'high density' foam mattress purchased back in 1984. It is starting to give
out so I keep it for camping use. It is good for two or three nights before it
started forming valleys.

I made the mistake of purchasing a 'memory foam' mattress to replace the 'high
density' foam. Tried to use it camping. In the hot months, 'memory foam' curls
up around you holding too much heat. In the cold months, 'memory foam'
remembers every bit of pressure for ever and is much like attempting to sleep on
a sack of half shelled walnuts.

Some where here on the farm I have several bags of wool from my sheep. This
wool has been clipped and held too long to make for easy spinning. I am
considering washing it all out and making a futon type mattress to replace the
'memory foam' I now use in the house. Real futons can become very heavy if the
wool used to make them becomes wet or heavily soiled. My homemade variety will
be bags of combed wool rollags that can be dismantled to wash once a year. This
washing should reduce collected soil and restore the fluff factor.

Another idea from a friend for a home made mattress was to watch the discount
stores for feather pillows. Sew the pillows together for a feather mattress.
If you used Velcro instead of sewing them together, then you could pull them
apart to wash once a year. Yes, you can machine wash and dry feather pillows.
The end result is clean pillows and some feather loss.

== 16 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:49 pm
From: John Rumm


On 13/01/2011 21:27, Andy Dingley wrote:
> On Jan 13, 9:01 pm, John Rumm<see.my.signat...@nowhere.null> wrote:
>
>> Do you recommend and suppliers of latex mattresses or for that matter
>> just the foam cut to size?
>
> There are a couple, just Google - mine came from some bunch up in
> Yorkshire. I've also used Foam For Comfort for chair squabs (I make
> chairs). I think the stuff is made in 2" sheets, which are then glued
> up thicker, so you can have hard/soft as you like. They sew you up a
> zipped mattress cover, as otherwise the stuff would erode on the
> corners. For chairs I just upholster over it.

Yup seen Foam for Comfort... shame they don't stick any prices on their
site these days.

--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/


== 17 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:51 pm
From: "Midge"


Interesting view on Premier Inn. I have had a Tempur mattress for some years
as it helps with a chronic back problem. Main snag I have with it is you
don't half notice when you're in someone elses bed (no smutty comments
please!). However, now I come to think of it, I don't think I've had any
issue with Premier Inn beds - which supports the view they are probably
better than most.

As far as "expensive" beds are concerned, when all is said and done its an
investment of less than 50p a day for something you use for 1/3 of the day,
and for maybe 10+ years. I can't think of many things that are better value
when you look at it like that.

BTW if anyone is interested in a view of the Tempur, mine is:

1. I got mine before other similar/cheaper products came on the market so
I'd recommend checking reviews of those and trying them. Its not new
technology any more.

2. Sleep around, and then shop around. Bought mine online in a sale and
saved over �300 but it still left a fair dent in the wallet.

3. Be prepared for some short term pain whilst your body adjusts to being
supported differently. Mrs Midge in particular suffered for a good few
weeks.

4. Some postings suggest you can feel hotter in summer. Agree - but we don't
personally find it uncomfortably so, and its down to personal preference.
For that reason alone, try any foam mattress till they get sick of the sight
of you in the store and make sure its suits you (that advice goes for any
bed come to think of it).

5. It's a good job they don't need turning, as they are surprisingly heavy
and there is nothing to grab hold of.

6. They are a bit like Marmite, you're either gonna love it or hate it.


"D.M.Chapman" <dmc@puffin.> wrote in message
news:ignq1o$gl9$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> In article <8p92ncF69hU2@mid.individual.net>,
> John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
>>I stay in a lot of cheap hotels. The worst mattresses are the foam ones
>>in cheap French chains, the best in Premier Inn in the UK. Maybe ask
>>them where they get theirs from?
>
>
> I agree - premier inn beds are pretty good. Better than many more
> expensive
> hotels IMO.
>
> http://www.premierinn.com/en/why/rooms.html
>
> "King-size Hypnos beds"
>
> http://www.hypnosbeds.com/
>
> Not cheap...
>
> Darren
>
>


== 18 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:18 pm
From: John MacLeod


On Jan 13, 10:49 pm, John Rumm <see.my.signat...@nowhere.null> wrote:
> On 13/01/2011 21:27, Andy Dingley wrote:
>
> > On Jan 13, 9:01 pm, John Rumm<see.my.signat...@nowhere.null>  wrote:
>
> >> Do you recommend and suppliers of latex mattresses or for that matter
> >> just the foam cut to size?
>
> > There are a couple, just Google - mine came from some bunch up in
> > Yorkshire. I've also used Foam For Comfort for chair squabs (I make
> > chairs). I think the stuff is made in 2" sheets, which are then glued
> > up thicker, so you can have hard/soft as you like. They sew you up a
> > zipped mattress cover, as otherwise the stuff would erode on the
> > corners. For chairs I just upholster over it.
>
> Yup seen Foam for Comfort... shame they don't stick any prices on their
> site these days.
>

Yes they do -- Dunlopillo Latex Mattress 78"x54"x6" medium firm,
£904.12. However I agree it's not very obvious -- there's a price
calculator which you can open from the bottom of the page. Works
fine.

== 19 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:19 pm
From: Matty F


On Jan 13, 8:46 pm, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.

I've had a waterbed for 20 years. The hills and valleys smooth out in
a few seconds!
It's impossible to move as it weighs 300kg, so if I move it to another
room I just drain it and refill with a dollar's worth of water.


== 20 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:41 pm
From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)


In article <8p8rfeFqafU1@mid.individual.net>,
Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding
>>>>> shops and get advice from people who know.

>>>> Other customers, you mean?

>>> Staff.

>> What would people who know anything be doing working in a bed shop?

>They'd obviously know how many customers have a problem with a mattress
>they flogged.

Your experience of shopping is clearly completely different from mine.

-- Richard


== 21 of 21 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 7:23 pm
From: "Rod Speed"


Richard Tobin wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> Richard Tobin wrote

>>>>>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding
>>>>>> shops and get advice from people who know.

>>>>> Other customers, you mean?

>>>> Staff.

>>> What would people who know anything be doing working in a bed shop?

>> They'd obviously know how many customers have a problem with a mattress they flogged.

> Your experience of shopping is clearly completely different from mine.

Or you have mindless prejudices/bigotry.

The individual who owns the store may well know more about mattresses than you will ever do.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Dentist's bum rush?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/74c07052a7943055?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 9:42 am
From: Mrs Irish Mike


On Jan 10, 11:29 am, "VFW," <george...@toast.net> wrote:

I wonder if they
> just don't like my politics.

How would the dentist know your politics? There are few people in
this world I would not like to piss off; anyone handeling my food and
anyone with power tools inside my mouth (dentists).

Pick your battles carefully.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Is somebody responsible for Climate Change?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/b32c9d8786296ac3?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 11:22 am
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of the deep jungle"


As news from Australia tell of the likely connection about
catastrophic weather and Climate Change, it occurs to me to ask:
IS SOMEBODY RESPONSIBLE?

I tend to think the dumb, lazy Christian consumers are #1, then the
Elites who run the world as a business enterprise, and next all of us
who sit on our ass. Well, I'M ALREADY RIDING A BICYCLE in spite of all
the dangers present on our roads, but I'm sure we could more. Getting
rid of all those SUVs? Cut down our meat consumption? Avoid packaging?

I just want those who deny CC to give us the option. There has to be
something better than sitting on one's ass. A fat ass is just too
ugly.

This is a fit ass...

http://imgusr.celebscentral.net/images/users/16934/200633/Jaime_Koeppe|jaime-koeppe-cute-face-fit-body-perfect-butt-megapostjaimethong021gd1.jpg

I know who to blame now: We can blame all the fat cats and fat
asses. ;)


--------------------------------------------------------------

THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS:

"Do you want a fat ass or a fit ass?"

http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 3:31 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of the deep jungle"


On Jan 13, 2:45 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of
the deep jungle" <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jan 13, 2:30 pm, "IlBeBa...@gmail.com" <ilbeba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 13, 1:19 pm, "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of
> > the deep jungle" <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > As news from Australia tell of the likely connection about
> > > catastrophic weather and Climate Change, it occurs to me to ask:
> > > IS SOMEBODY RESPONSIBLE?
>
> > > I tend to think the dumb, lazy Christian consumers are #1, then the
> > > Elites who run the world as a business enterprise, and next all of us
> > > who sit on our ass. Well, I'M ALREADY RIDING A BICYCLE in spite of all
> > > the dangers present on our roads, but I'm sure we could more. Getting
> > > rid of all those SUVs? Cut down our meat consumption? Avoid packaging?
>
> > > I just want those who deny CC to give us the option. There has to be
> > > something better than sitting on one's ass. A fat ass is just too
> > > ugly.
>
> > > This is a fit ass...
>
> > >http://imgusr.celebscentral.net/images/users/16934/200633/Jaime_Koeppe|jaime-koeppe-cute-face-fit-body-perfect-butt-megapostjaimethong021gd1.jpg
>
> > > I know who to blame now: We can blame all the fat cats and fat
> > > asses. ;)
>
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > > THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS:
>
> > > "Do you want a fat ass or a fit ass?"
>
> > >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> > Man is partially responsible for climate change, but, the second law
> > of thermodynamics (entropy) which says all useful energy is running
> > to a lower level toward decay...is a greater cause. In a finite
> > cosmos such as ours, everything is heading downward by this proven
> > scientific law . This is one reason why the desperate philosophy to
> > jettison the Creator, macro evolution (chaos to order) , is an
> > impossibility . ANd the second law affects ALL systems within the
> > Universe.
>
> So --as expected-- Christians make up excuses instead of a getting a
> fit ass...
>
> By the way, I don't think that fit ass came through...
>
> http://imgusr.celebscentral.net/images/users/16934/200633/Jaime_Koeppe|jaime-koeppe-cute-face-fit-body-perfect-butt-megapostjaimethong021gd1.jpg


Hey, it really works! That fit ass comes through with copy and
pasting.

I have to make a t-shirt on this issue of fit or fat ass... It has to
make sense though.

I need a slogan!

How about?

"Do it for the Planet
Do it for the Community
Do it of your ass!"

"Ride a Bike!"

OTHER IDEA:

"Don't be a fat ass"

"Ride a Bike!"

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 6:36 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of the deep jungle"

This post is an example of good responsible recycling of ideas:

On Jan 13, 9:12 pm, truexactly <truexactly...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 01:49, default wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 5 Jan 2011 05:34:53 -0800 (PST), "His Highness the
> > TibetanMonkey, the prophet of the deep jungle"
> > <nolionnoprob...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Expanding to other planets doesn't really solve much, for example
> >>> you can't just shift 1Billion people to Mars.
> >>> It would however make a difference in the ultimate survivability
> >>> of the human race.
>
> > Considering what it cost and took to ship three people to the moon for
> > a week, and how often it has been done .... who actually believes that
> > people will learn to go to another planet and actually live there?
>
> imperative of survival and discovery will have us go there. I'm sure
> your familiar with the story of Columbus and the resistance to have him
> search for the New World at the then thought "edge of the world".

Not imperative to survival at all. We are working hard to make this
planet look like the Moon, and degrade it to the state of Haiti.

> > Not impossible maybe, but not possible in the time we have left if we
> > keep trashing this planet.
>
> There's plenty of time. The imminent threat of extinction by nuclear
> holocaust is over, that was the threat I was aware of as a youth.
> Sure some people miss this imminent threat from something, be it
> terrorists or global warming.

Nuclear vs. environmental disaster is a dilemma of "quick end vs. slow
end." Maybe nuclear is better than eating each other alive. Or perhaps
a combination of the two is likely.

In the meantime we are wasting a fortune on space travel.


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 1 topic - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Buying a new mattress and Ikea - 25 messages, 18 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Buying a new mattress and Ikea
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 25 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 11:52 pm
From: Adrian


"john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying:

> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys.

IIRC their mattresses have 10 year warranties. Have you contacted them
about that?

> Also it so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for
> spring cleaning.

Has it got a lot heavier since you bought it?

> Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit thin, although we do prefer a
> firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.

What did you think when you went into the store and tried one?


== 2 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 12:15 am
From: Michaelangelo


john brook burst on the scene, and said:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also
> it so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for
> spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if
> 10cm is a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we
> use a mattress pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.

I know nothing about foam mattresses but, looking at those available
online, 10cm seems quite shallow. 15cm seems a more common size. �60 is
also pretty cheap but probably accounted for by the thinness of the
mattress and Ikea's generally low prices.

I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice
from people who know. If the Ikea one then seems a good buy you can
still go for it. You don't buy a new mattress very often and like most
things you get what you pay for so cheapest isn't necessarily best.

On balance, if I was in the market for a mattress I don't think Ikea
would be my first port of call. In fact I'm not sure I would look at
them at all.

--
Michaelangelo
No good deed goes unpunished

Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel


== 3 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 12:20 am
From: Adrian


Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:

> On balance, if I was in the market for a mattress I don't think Ikea
> would be my first port of call. In fact I'm not sure I would look at
> them at all.

We had an Ikea mattress for about 10-12 years. It was absolutely fine.


== 4 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 12:42 am
From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)


In article <8p7qlpFq2qU1@mid.individual.net>,
Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote:

>I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice
>from people who know.

Other customers, you mean?

-- Richard


== 5 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 12:46 am
From: "Peter Hawkins"


"Michaelangelo" <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote in message
news:8p7qlpFq2qU1@mid.individual.net...
> john brook burst on the scene, and said:
>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
>> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring
>> cleaning.
>>
>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
>> 200x140x10cm for £60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm
>> is a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a
>> mattress pad.
>>
>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
>> elswhere? Thanks.
>
> I know nothing about foam mattresses but, looking at those available
> online, 10cm seems quite shallow. 15cm seems a more common size. £60 is
> also pretty cheap but probably accounted for by the thinness of the
> mattress and Ikea's generally low prices.
>
> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice from
> people who know. If the Ikea one then seems a good buy you can still go
> for it. You don't buy a new mattress very often and like most things you
> get what you pay for so cheapest isn't necessarily best.
>
> On balance, if I was in the market for a mattress I don't think Ikea would
> be my first port of call. In fact I'm not sure I would look at them at
> all.
>
> --
> Michaelangelo
> No good deed goes unpunished
>
> Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
> www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
> www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel
>
>

We have ordered (but not had delivered yet) a new base and mattress, and the
mattress is a normal sprung one, but does not need to be turned.

This might help with it being too heavy, as once installed it shouldn't have
to be moved often.

I would think that a thin foam mattress might not be comfortable after a
while, but this is not from experience.
--
Peter Hawkins
South Lincolnshire


== 6 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:08 am
From: "Foxy at Work"


john brook wrote:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also
> it so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for
> spring cleaning.
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if
> 10cm is a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we
> use a mattress pad.
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.

As far as foam mattresses are concerned I wouldn't get a 10cm one, mind you
they are also quite heavy and not easy to turn. I love mine allthough it's
just a "topper" and in laid on top of my standard mattress. The price of �60
also seems very cheap.

Jen


== 7 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:04 am
From: "michael adams"

"john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
> thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.
>
>

From experience of thin cheap Ikea foam mattresses. Regardless of how often
they are turned or rotated the foam loses its resilience after about two
years or so. And so any valleys will reappear after a couple of days of
the mattress being turned. This is for users weighing no more than eleven
stone.

Without checking their website right now, I always wondered why some foam
mattresses cost two and three times the price of the cheap ones. Maybe this
is the reason why.

michael adams

...


== 8 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 1:19 am
From: Michaelangelo


Richard Tobin burst on the scene, and said:
> In article <8p7qlpFq2qU1@mid.individual.net>,
> Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote:
>
>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice
>> from people who know.
>
> Other customers, you mean?

Staff.

--
Michaelangelo
No good deed goes unpunished

Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel


== 9 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:10 am
From: The Natural Philosopher


john brook wrote:

>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.
>
>
You could scarce find a *worse* deal.

Oh, and it's 'elsewhere'.


== 10 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:13 am
From: harry


On Jan 13, 7:46 am, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for 60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> one elswhere for the same money?  Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
> thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere?  Thanks.

If you are talking about "memory foam" an aspect not realised is that
they are very hot (and sweaty). This because compared with a standard
mattress they are very good insulation. When you think, there is only
a very thin layer on a standard spring mattress. And if you ever want
to "wash " it, you can look out. Best done on the driveway .


== 11 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:18 am
From: leevan


On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:46:15 -0000, john brook wrote:

> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
> thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.

Considering you spend around a third of your life on a mattress I would
suggest going for the best you can afford. �60 sounds far to cheap for long
lasting quality.
--
leevan's dickie birds
www.pbrentnall.co.uk


== 12 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:25 am
From: Skipweasel


In article <igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org>, bluestar954
@mail.invalid says...
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for £60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> one elswhere for the same money?
>

Personally I can't stand foam mattresses - they last about a week.

Turn you turn your old one often?

--
Skipweasel - never knowingly understood.


== 13 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:26 am
From: Skipweasel


In article <8p7udsFegvU1@mid.individual.net>,
mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid says...
> >> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice
> >> from people who know.
> >
> > Other customers, you mean?
>
> Staff.
>

Ah - what they mostly know is how to steer you towards the item which
will earn them the highest commission.

--
Skipweasel - never knowingly understood.


== 14 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:27 am
From: Michaelangelo


leevan burst on the scene, and said:

> �60 sounds far to cheap for long lasting quality.

But about right for long-lasting back problems

--
Michaelangelo
No good deed goes unpunished

Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel


== 15 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:27 am
From: Tim Streater


In article <8p7u7fFdhoU1@mid.individual.net>,
"michael adams" <mjadams27@onetel.net.uk> wrote:

> "john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> > It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> > mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> > heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
> >
> > We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> > 200x140x10cm for £60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> > one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
> > thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
> >
> > The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> > elswhere? Thanks.
>
> From experience of thin cheap Ikea foam mattresses. Regardless of how often
> they are turned or rotated the foam loses its resilience after about two
> years or so. And so any valleys will reappear after a couple of days of
> the mattress being turned. This is for users weighing no more than eleven
> stone.
>
> Without checking their website right now, I always wondered why some foam
> mattresses cost two and three times the price of the cheap ones. Maybe this
> is the reason why.

I bought an orthopaedic mattress in 1980 while I was living in Geneva.
Cost a few hundred quid *then* but has been well worth it as it's still
in use and as good as new. It's firm foam about 13-14cm thick, and for
me the best feature is that one person can turn over while the other
occupant need barely be aware that this has happened, unlike with sprung
mattresses where it's like you're both lying on a giant jelly.

Bought a conceptually similar one from IKEA about 10 or so years ago,
nothing like as good, and now a bit lumpy in the way you describe. Both
mattresses are on essentially identical IKEA beds (no problem with
those) which have wooden slats to support the mattress. [1]

The long and the short of it is, IMO, that you get what you pay for. I'd
look around and test them by lying down, and expect to pay a decent
amount for something you want to be comfortable and last a long time.

[1] Prolly a bit like the wooden beds that WW2 prisoners slept on, where
they took the slats out to use for escape tunnel support.

--
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted" -- Bill of Rights 1689


== 16 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:30 am
From: Michaelangelo


Michaelangelo burst on the scene, and said:
> leevan burst on the scene, and said:
>
>> £60 sounds far to cheap for long lasting quality.
>
> But about right for long-lasting back problems

--
Michaelangelo
No good deed goes unpunished

Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel


== 17 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 2:32 am
From: Michaelangelo


Tim Streater burst on the scene, and said:

> [1] Prolly a bit like the wooden beds that WW2 prisoners slept on,
> where they took the slats out to use for escape tunnel support.

If you require support in your escape tunnel I would suggest that you
use the orthopaedic mattress rather than the wooden slats.

--
Michaelangelo
No good deed goes unpunished

Self-catering, holiday accommodation for disabled people:
www.woodhead-cottage.co.uk
www.flickr.com/photos/mikenagel


== 18 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 3:37 am
From: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin)


In article <8p7udsFegvU1@mid.individual.net>,
Michaelangelo <mikenagel@lineone.net.invalid> wrote:

>>> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice
>>> from people who know.

>> Other customers, you mean?

>Staff.

What would people who know anything be doing working in a bed shop?

-- Richard


== 19 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:11 am
From: Tabby


On Jan 13, 7:46 am, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for 60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
> one elswhere for the same money?  Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
> thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere?  Thanks.

I wouldnt even look at Ikea for mattresses. Had very satisfactory
experience with M&S. Cheap mattresses arent worth buying, even if
you're poor, as they dont last. A good mattress does.


NT


== 20 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:18 am
From: Andy Dingley


On Jan 13, 7:46 am, "john brook" <bluestar...@mail.invalid> wrote:

> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for 60.

That's certainly cheap, but is it a good mattress?

IMHE, Ikea mattresses have several problems:
* They're a weird size, so you have to buy Ikea mattresses to fit Ikea
beds.
* The quality is low: comfort and longevity both suffer.
* PU foam isn't great whoever makes it.

My own favourite mattresses aren't cheap, but they do solve these
problems: _latex_ foam (i.e. natural rubber), not PU. It comes in
sheets and is cut to any size, so you can make it fit an Ikea
bedframe. Comfort is also brilliant - better even than viscoelastic
foams like Tempur.


== 21 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:19 am
From: Allan


On 13/01/2011 07:46, john brook wrote:
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.

[snip]

You might like to look at:
http://www.which.co.uk/mattresses
or a Which? article from Aug 2008:
http://www.which.co.uk/documents/pdf/p66-69_mattresses-153509.pdf

Allan


== 22 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:35 am
From: Derek F


On 13/01/2011 08:15, Michaelangelo wrote:
> john brook burst on the scene, and said:
>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it
>> so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring
>> cleaning.
>>
>> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
>> 200x140x10cm for £60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
>> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm
>> is a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a
>> mattress pad.
>>
>> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
>> elswhere? Thanks.
>
> I know nothing about foam mattresses but, looking at those available
> online, 10cm seems quite shallow. 15cm seems a more common size. £60 is
> also pretty cheap but probably accounted for by the thinness of the
> mattress and Ikea's generally low prices.
>
> I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice from
> people who know. If the Ikea one then seems a good buy you can still go
> for it. You don't buy a new mattress very often and like most things you
> get what you pay for so cheapest isn't necessarily best.
>
> On balance, if I was in the market for a mattress I don't think Ikea
> would be my first port of call. In fact I'm not sure I would look at
> them at all.
>
I'd go there for the Swedish Meatballs and excellent potatoes:-) They
used to often have vouchers that gave you them for 1p. We would have one
each go round the shop and have another before leaving.
Derek


== 23 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 4:53 am
From: "alexander.keys1"


On Jan 13, 12:35 pm, Derek F <lordpil...@NOXo2.co.uk> wrote:
> On 13/01/2011 08:15, Michaelangelo wrote:
>
>
>
> > john brook burst on the scene, and said:
> >> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> >> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it
> >> so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring
> >> cleaning.
>
> >> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> >> 200x140x10cm for £60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
> >> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm
> >> is a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a
> >> mattress pad.
>
> >> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> >> elswhere? Thanks.
>
> > I know nothing about foam mattresses but, looking at those available
> > online, 10cm seems quite shallow. 15cm seems a more common size. £60 is
> > also pretty cheap but probably accounted for by the thinness of the
> > mattress and Ikea's generally low prices.
>
> > I would go around one or two dedicated bedding shops and get advice from
> > people who know. If the Ikea one then seems a good buy you can still go
> > for it. You don't buy a new mattress very often and like most things you
> > get what you pay for so cheapest isn't necessarily best.
>
> > On balance, if I was in the market for a mattress I don't think Ikea
> > would be my first port of call. In fact I'm not sure I would look at
> > them at all.
>
> I'd go there for the Swedish Meatballs and excellent potatoes:-) They
> used to often have vouchers that gave you them for 1p. We would have one
> each go round the shop and have another before leaving.
> Derek- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Get a futon bed, Argos have them for about £100, futons are much
better for your back, they are less heavy to move, and you can fold
the bed up into a sofa.

== 24 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 5:51 am
From: Ronald Raygun


Adrian wrote:

> "john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding much
> like they were saying:
>
>> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
>> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys.
>
> IIRC their mattresses have 10 year warranties. Have you contacted them
> about that?
>
>> Also it so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for
>> spring cleaning.
>
> Has it got a lot heavier since you bought it?

Good point. Besides, you're not meant to clean the springs.

>> Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit thin, although we do prefer a
>> firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.
>
> What did you think when you went into the store and tried one?

I think you'll find they frown on people disrobing in the store,
and you can't really make a proper assessment when fully clothed.

== 25 of 25 ==
Date: Thurs, Jan 13 2011 7:15 am
From: "Mr Pounder"

"john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
news:igmak7$r3t$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
> heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.
>
> We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
> 200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a
> thicker one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is
> a bit thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress
> pad.
>
> The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
> elswhere? Thanks.

Stick a 3 before your �60 and you will get something 1/2 decent.

Mr Pounder
>
>
>


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 15 new messages in 7 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* John Lewis curtain runners rip off - 5 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/833fefed59be8376?hl=en
* The Dentist's bum rush? - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/74c07052a7943055?hl=en
* Unbelievable, the Buddhists and I are making sense! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/37e985401ef2f642?hl=en
* `****HOT SEXY PHOTOS&VIDEOS**** - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/f8a390b2036d913c?hl=en
* Lost fight with Tracfone - 3 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/6d1408373168760d?hl=en
* THE TRUTH TO MAKING $13,693.94 IN 48 HOURS - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c8fb62caa874980d?hl=en
* Buying a new mattress and Ikea - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: John Lewis curtain runners rip off
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/833fefed59be8376?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Tues, Jan 11 2011 11:48 pm
From: "Nightjar <\"cpb\"@" <"insertmysurnamehere>


On 11/01/2011 21:24, js.b1 wrote:
> They look like Swish Nova, about 5-10p each on Ebay.
>
> Accounts is pricing according to profit margins...

It is more probably pricing according to the cost of buying in what is
now a small volume special item, rather than a high volume current stock
item.

Colin Bignell


== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 1:56 am
From: stuart noble


On 11/01/2011 22:30, Don Phillipson wrote:
> "john brook"<bluestar954@mail.invalid> wrote in message
> news:igignb$7ec$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>> Some years ago we bought a curtain rail and some curtain runners (the
>> things that slide along the rail and that you hook the curtain hooks
>> into), from John Lewis.
>>
>> Now the curtain runners are all disintegrating, and so I went into John
>> Lewis to get some more. I was told they no longer supply this type of
>> runner, but have some at �3 for 10.
>> . . . Has anyone found a suitable alternative to these John Lewis runners?
>> I can afford to buy them from John Lewis, but feel disinclined because of
>> their attitude.
>
> In N.America, specialized stores sell only curtains, window blinds and
> associated hardware, and the hardware is also sold by fabric stores
> (because some customers sew their own curtains.) Both types of
> store usually carry a much larger range of this special-purpose
> hardware than do general furnishing stores, where you can also
> buy a piano or a dishwasher.
>

A good example of a small, low price item that should only be bought
from EBay/Amazon. High street retailers can't afford to sell anything
for less than a fiver it seems.


== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 4:23 am
From: John Rumm


On 12/01/2011 07:48, Nightjar <"cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere> wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 21:24, js.b1 wrote:
>> They look like Swish Nova, about 5-10p each on Ebay.
>>
>> Accounts is pricing according to profit margins...
>
> It is more probably pricing according to the cost of buying in what is
> now a small volume special item, rather than a high volume current stock
> item.

And I am sure they might argue with reasonable cause that most retailers
would simply dump the previous stock line altogether.


--
Cheers,

John.

/=================================================================\
| Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk |
\=================================================================/


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 10:25 am
From: Jules Richardson


On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 13:24:23 -0800, js.b1 wrote:

> They look like Swish Nova, about 5-10p each on Ebay.

Agreed - or certainly Swish anyway (not sure about the Nova bit); I
remember my folks having some exactly like that at their place and having
to source some new bits (but this was years ago and a local DIY place had
them).

cheers

Jules


== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 11:40 am
From: Dave N


john brook wrote, on 11/01/2011 21:05:
> Some years ago we bought a curtain rail and some curtain runners (the things
> that slide along the rail and that you hook the curtain hooks into), from
> John Lewis.
>
> Now the curtain runners are all disintegrating, and so I went into John
> Lewis to get some more. I was told they no longer supply this type of
> runner, but have some at �3 for 10.
>
> Thats nearly three times the price of the current ones they supply. I was
> also told the new ones *no longer fit* the old rail.
>
> Here's a tinypic website photo of the two different runners. The original
> type is on the left of the photo. The one on the right is the one they are
> now offering.
>
> http://tinypic.com/r/107s6xt/7
>
>
> Now it turns out the *new* ones do fit into the old rail, but they run very
> stiffly in the rail.
>
> Does this represent a change in policy of John Lewis to being helpful to
> being greedy? The rise and fall of the Roman Empire, once you reach a
> certain dominance?
>
> �3 for 10 of these? On an average rail I guess you would need 30 or 40 or
> so? Thats 9 or 12 pounds for a few cheap as chips plastic.
>
> Has anyone found a suitable alternative to these John Lewis runners? I can
> afford to buy them from John Lewis, but feel disinclined because of their
> attitude.

I don't think John Lewis are trying to rip anyone off - Swish curtain
fittings are now hard to find anywhere. Anyway, please see the
following web site of a firm based in Edinburgh; they are currently
offering your Swish G-1 Deluxe Gliders (your LH photo) at 1.50 pounds
for #10, plus VAT plus postage. I used this firm once in 2009 and
received a quick and pain-free service, but take them as you find them:-

<www.fittingservices.com>


--
Dave N


==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Dentist's bum rush?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/74c07052a7943055?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 12:09 am
From: Ol' OneTooth

On Tue, 11 Jan 2011 03:14:15 -0500, "h" <tmclone@searchmachine.com>
wrote:

>Seriously. And I have my teeth cleaned every 4 months, like normal people.

I had my tooth cleaned back in... lemme see... 1974, I think. :)
--
Ol' OneTooth


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 7:25 am
From: "VFW,"


In article <georgeswk-6E4A06.11290610012011@news.toast.net>,
"VFW," <georgeswk@toast.net> wrote:

> I thought it SOP that a dentist sees you every 6 months. A dentist I saw
> doesn't call and now acts like they aren't all that interested in caring
> for my teeth. Nothing blatant but I'm having my doubts. I wonder if they
> just don't like my politics. Or I'm too fussy. I dunno.
> are they T-party dentists? Dentists do seem to lean conservative even
> flashing the "fish". Is there a way to test the waters?
> I'll have to go "fish" for a new one. Again!

I do attribute a lot of these difficulties with dentists is the wide
spread use of Mercury. The older the dentist that uses it probably has
had an overdose of this heavy metal.
Heard of the "Mad Hatter"?
just recently dentists have been ordered not to so treat Pregnant women
with mercury.
--
Karma, What a concept!

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Unbelievable, the Buddhists and I are making sense!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/37e985401ef2f642?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 6:34 am
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the prophet of the deep jungle"


On Jan 11, 11:28 pm, Vajra <va...@nym.mixmin.net> wrote:

> >It is my contention that species put down their defenses outside a
> >jungle environment. Proof of that is how Northern Europe has
> >progressed from the depths of barbarism, some as recent as WWII.
>
> Yes, possibly. Although some might argue that the barbarism has just
> changed its form.

I'd ask a few practical questions to rate barbarism:

Are road manners the rule and not the exception? They seem to be in
Germany. Not here!

Are the homeless all over the place? Big problem here.

Do women feel safe in parks! Not here! (the homeless are respected,
not women)

Do they respect cyclists? Not here!

It's not an all or nothing scale. There are different degrees.

> >Or extinction of the species.
>
> Correct.

> >It may mean nothing for bikes on the road or outside the central area.
>
> It's a shame the Dutch model hasn't been adopted by more countries.

Yep, I'm trying to sell that system. But the Fat Cats don't care about
bicycles or legalizing pot. They only care about their SUVs and
keeping "all the prohibitions" while the Mexicans are terrorized and
our prisons are overwhelmed.

> >> Ah, yes. The money delusion.
>
> >Here it buys you everything, except space. Yes, they live in Gated
> >Communities but enjoy little space.
>
> Everything except happiness too.

They have beautiful cages overlooking the ocean, but they are still
cages. I've said the other day, "bicycles mean wings for pedestrians"
and I want to fly! A few places to escape to --if you dare to ride the
road!


==============================================================================
TOPIC: `****HOT SEXY PHOTOS&VIDEOS****
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/f8a390b2036d913c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 8:24 am
From: RAMYA


SAMEERAREDDY HOT BOOBS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2011/01/sameerareddy.html
HOT SEXY ACTRESS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2011/01/hot.html
latest hot sruthi hassan stills
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2011/01/shurthihassan-new-stills.html
UNSEEN HOT SEXY PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2011/01/never.html
SAMANTHA HOT SEXY PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2011/01/samantha.html
SEXY DIYA MIRZA
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/diya-mirza.html
HOT AISHWARIYA RAI
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/aish.html
priyamani hot&sexy photos
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/priyamani.html
KATRINA SEXY PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/katrina.html
ANUSHKA HOT PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/anuska.html
BEAUTIFUL AISHWARIYA RAI
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/12/aiesh.html
TRISHA HOT PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/2010/11/trisha-hot.html
AMISHAPATEL HOT VIDEOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/amisha
HANSIKHA HOT SEXY PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/HANSIKA
HOT SEXY COLLEGE GIRLS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/hot
BEAUTIFUL LARADATTA
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/laradatta
NIKISHA HOT BOOBS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/nikisha
PRIYANKA SPICY LATEST PICS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/priyanka
ONLY FOR YOUTH
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/spicy
SRILEKHA UNSEENED PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/Srilekha
CHOPRA UNBELIVABLE PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/chopra
HOT BIPASA BASU PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/bipasa
TRISHA IN A SEXY FEEL
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/thrisha
SRISHA HOT BOOBS SHOW
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/srisha
BEAUTIFUL POONAM PHOTOS
http://karomasti9.blogspot.com/search/label/poonam

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Lost fight with Tracfone
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/6d1408373168760d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 3:16 pm
From: Sofa Slug


On 1/10/2011 1:23 PM, Gordon wrote:
> "krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"<krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in
> news:mfnki6dfsi5uednatsuj1gak3tkfncikqc@4ax.com:
>
>
>>
>> I've been thinking about switching from Verizon to PagePlus. We never
>> use all of our minutes (well, we did once) and PagePlus looks to be
>> about the same price even if we did. They also use the Verizon
>> network, which is a huge plus. Not interested in text or Internet.
>>
>
> PagePlus is OK. I have it on one of my phones and I will pit it
> on another phone when my Spritn contract runs out. On my phone,
> I just put $25.00 on it when the minuts are running low. It
> takes me anywhere from 6 weeks to 120 days to use up the minuts.
> Pretty cheap phone service any way you look at it.
>
> I have to warn you that customer service is next to non-existint.
> If you are comfortable dealing with them over the web, they are
> OK. But getting a live body is impossible.


I've had the opposite experience with Page Plus. Every time I've called
they have picked right up, and have been friendly and helpful ...such a
breath of fresh air after dealing with Verizon! I highly recommend Page
Plus.


== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 9:52 pm
From: Todd Allcock


At 11 Jan 2011 16:26:47 +0000 Fred wrote:

> Using a Sprint CDMA phone poses a special problem for Pageplus. Sprint
> sells phones that are ONLY on 1900 Mhz because that's all Sprint is on,
I
> think. PP uses Verizon, one of the 850 REAL cellular system carriers
and
> the Sprint phones don't all cover this band. Just a headsup to watch
out
> for. Going from Sprint to Pageplus sure expands that coverage map!

I don't think Sprint has sold a 1900-only phone in years. While Sprint
native coverage is all 1900, they have quite a bit of 850 roaming
coverage included in their plans, so their phones need to support 850.

Having said that, avoiding Sprint phones with PP is still a good idea-
Sprint phones typically can't be programmed over-the-air by PP without
some hacking, I've been told.


== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 10:11 pm
From: Todd Allcock


At 11 Jan 2011 16:24:44 +0000 Fred wrote:
> Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote in
> news:Xns9E69908229C35VeebleFetzer@216.250.188.140:
>
> > In news:Xns9E697BF667D99nobodyhomecom@74.209.131.13 Fred
> > <nobody@home.com> wrote:
> >
> >> If you find a better deal, I'd sure appreciate your posting it here
> >> for the rest of us to switch to.
> >
> > T-Mobile's pay-as-you-go plan lets you buy time in $10, $30, $50 and
> > $100 chunks. The time on the three cheaper plans is good for 90 days
> > (although unused minutes carry over if you re-up in time), but once
> > you've spent $100 (any combination, over any period), your time
> > becomes good for a year.
> >
> > Once you've hit the $100 mark, any additional time you buy, even the
> > $10 chunk, extends your time limit out a year from when you buy them.
> >
> > For a low-volume user like me, I made the initial $100 investment, got
> > 1000 minutes, and now can carry the account (along with all my unused
> > minutes) for $10/year.
> >
> > T-Mobile's coverage isn't the best, but if you're in their coverage
> > area, you might want to look at them.
> >
> > They also have a no-contract $30/month plan that gives you 1500
> > minutes/month (that don't carry over).
> >
> > http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/plans/prepaid-plans.aspx
> >
>
> There's two problems with this plan. Worst is it's T-mobile, one of
the
> tiniest footprint sellphone systems in America. If you travel at all,
> you'll soon regret being a T-mo customer.

I travel quite a bit. Like Sinatra sang, regrets? I've had a few, but
too few to mention.
T-Mo's issues are usually only in pretty remote areas. T-Mo includes
quite a bit of 850-MHz roaming coverage in their prepaid plans. I also
have PagePlus phones as backups, but rarely need them.


> Two is Pageplus' rate on the
> huge Verizon system is less per minute, at 3.7c/min considering a 7%
PIN
> purchase discount from Callingmart.
>
> Nobody still does it better than Pageplus.....including the limited
> footprint service of T-mo.


There are a few advantages of T-Mo prepaid for me. My son can use my
wife's old first-gen will unlocked iPhone on T-Mo's GSM, but not PP's CDMA.

More important for the little I use either my T-Mo or PagePlus prepaids
is the lower annual cost of T-Mo. Once you've spent $100 on airtime, you
become a "Gold Rewards" customer, and _all_ future refills get one-year
expiration dates. It only costs me $10 to keep my T-Mo prepaids alive
for a year, vs. $30 for my PagePlus phones, and I don't lose $6/year in
junk fees on T-Mo.

I originally got the T-Mo prepaids during a promotion back in 2005 or
2006 when they gave you Gold Reward status with only $25 in airtime. For
$0.83/month I just can't let them expire. They come in handy as
"throwaway" numbers, like when selling a car in a classified ad. After
it's sold, I change the voicemail message to "sorry, it's already sold,"
turn off the phone and stick it back in the drawer.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: THE TRUTH TO MAKING $13,693.94 IN 48 HOURS
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c8fb62caa874980d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 9:59 pm
From: MARIA JOSEPH


THE TRUTH TO MAKING $13,693.94 IN 48 HOURS

You need to go and check this out right now!

=>> https://secure.aischeckout.com/t/qraiI/nyPHA/subaffiliate


It's an underground method to start making
CRAZY cash by this time tomorrow!
This method is responsible for making
$112,075.22 just last month and has the
guru's running scared!

It even made $13,693.94 in just 48 hours!
Forget everything you've been taught in the
past and listen up.

Go to this page NOW and learn how you can
steal this exact $4.1 million business for
yourself:

=>> https://secure.aischeckout.com/t/qraiI/nyPHA/subaffiliate

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Buying a new mattress and Ikea
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c81c71905eda745d?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 11:46 pm
From: "john brook"


It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys. Also it so
heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for spring cleaning.

We thought we would buy a foam mattress now. Ikea do a double one
200x140x10cm for �60. Is this a good price or could we perhaps buy a thicker
one elswhere for the same money? Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit
thin, although we do prefer a firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.

The question is whether to buy at Ikea or can we find a better deal
elswhere? Thanks.


== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Wed, Jan 12 2011 11:52 pm
From: Adrian


"john brook" <bluestar954@mail.invalid> gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying:

> It was only a few years ago we bought an expensive Ikea sprung double
> mattress and its now no longer flat but has hills and valleys.

IIRC their mattresses have 10 year warranties. Have you contacted them
about that?

> Also it so heavy that its almost impossible for us to move about for
> spring cleaning.

Has it got a lot heavier since you bought it?

> Also we are wondering if 10cm is a bit thin, although we do prefer a
> firmer mattress and we use a mattress pad.

What did you think when you went into the store and tried one?


==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en