- Power outage: coping tips - 1 Update
- Medicare issues - 7 Updates
- Stocks issues - 1 Update
- So which of the presidential candidates seems to be the most economically savvy? - 1 Update
| ggggg9271@gmail.com: Oct 08 02:59PM -0700 https://kymkemp.com/2019/10/08/humboldt-trinity-counties-added-to-public-safety-power-shutoff-tips-on-how-to-prepare/age |
| The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Oct 08 08:31AM -0700 On 10/07/2019 03:37 PM, Bob F wrote: > is a big difference. I did find that the plan with no coverage for the > deductible for the Part B expenses easily saved me more money than the > one that covered that. I just have to pay my doc the first $184 or whatever. Yes. It costs about as much to cover the last 20% as my Medicare premium, but if you have a big expense (heart surgery, for instance) you're way ahead of the game for a long time. > limited. Of course, word is that Medigap plans are on the Republicans > target for elimination in their effort to force everyone into the > privatized advantage plans. Thanks for giving me yet another piece of shit to worry about. Why would this be a Republican policy rather than a Dem? Medigap is already private. -- Cheers, Bev Save the whales for dessert |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Oct 08 01:07PM -0700 On 10/8/2019 8:31 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > Thanks for giving me yet another piece of shit to worry about. Why > would this be a Republican policy rather than a Dem? Medigap is already > private. They seem to think that advantage plans make huge money for the insurance company, so they are good. The advantage plans cost Medicare more than regular Medicare because their costs end up being higher, and they passed laws to require Medicare to make up the difference to try to get insurance companies to participate. |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Oct 08 01:23PM -0700 On 10/8/2019 8:31 AM, The Real Bev wrote: > Thanks for giving me yet another piece of shit to worry about. Why > would this be a Republican policy rather than a Dem? Medigap is already > private. By the way, if you haven't looked at the plan G, the only difference between it and the F is that it doesn't cover the Part B deductible of $185, but it costs maybe $300 less. |
| The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Oct 08 01:29PM -0700 On 10/08/2019 01:07 PM, Bob F wrote: >> private. > They seem to think that advantage plans make huge money for the > insurance company, so they are good. The less they treat more patients, the more money they make. I think I can decide when I'm being over- or under-treated, and I don't want "under" to be the default. > more than regular Medicare because their costs end up being higher, and > they passed laws to require Medicare to make up the difference to try to > get insurance companies to participate. When Pelosi was negotiating Obamacare, she talked to all the providers and none of the recipients. -- Cheers, Bev Linux -- the ultimate freebie! |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Oct 08 01:54PM -0700 On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 3:25:31 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote: > By the way, if you haven't looked at the plan G, the only difference > between it and the F is that it doesn't cover the Part B deductible of > $185, but it costs maybe $300 less. Plan G was what I opted for from AARP United Healthcare. All this depends on what state you live in but the same plan from BC/BS was $10 more per month in my state than the AARP plan. |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Oct 08 02:13PM -0700 On 10/8/2019 1:54 PM, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote: > Plan G was what I opted for from AARP United Healthcare. All this depends on > what state you live in but the same plan from BC/BS was $10 more per month in > my state than the AARP plan. Cheapest for me in Seattle was Cigna. |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Oct 08 02:42PM -0700 On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 4:15:43 PM UTC-5, Bob F wrote: > > what state you live in but the same plan from BC/BS was $10 more per month in > > my state than the AARP plan. > Cheapest for me in Seattle was Cigna. Funny you should mention Cigna! I got a letter from them last week wanting me to switch to their plan G. It was close to a dollar higher than what I'm presently paying here in Nashville. |
| Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net>: Oct 08 07:34AM -0700 > https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-10-06/whatever-the-future-holds-stocks-are-not-priced-for-a-recession That's usually the case, just prior to a recession. |
| Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net>: Oct 08 07:33AM -0700 > On Sunday, September 22, 2019 at 11:48:38 PM UTC-7, gggg...@gmail.com wrote: > > ???????????????? > Andrew Yang So far, sadly , it's Trump. The rest with the exception of Biden are clueless socialist that would wreck the economy. And now that Biden has the staggering problem with his son and Urkaine and China, he's not going to be the nominee. He also has some obvious mental impairment that's not getting better. I would bet that the Democrat nominee will be someone who hasn't entered the race yet. As Trump falters, I think it's very possible that some wealthy Democrat that has enough money to be able to run, eg Bloomberg, will enter the race. Hillary is also restarting her engine. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
