- To lower higher ed. and health care costs - 5 Updates
- Gas ranges - 5 Updates
- CUM LET GLOBE HACK (FUCK) you - 1 Update
- Boeing 737: Would you book a flight on it? - 1 Update
- Weighted blanket - 2 Updates
| ggggg9271@gmail.com: Nov 20 09:02PM -0800 On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 7:21:09 PM UTC-7, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote: > On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 6:08:34 PM UTC-5, gggg...@gmail.com wrote: > > Why can't the U.S. just use Canada as a model? > Do you want to pay for healthcare for every deadbeat and welfare recipient? https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Nov 20 10:04PM -0800 > https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest. |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 21 06:54AM -0800 On 11/20/2019 10:04 PM, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote: > On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 11:02:16 PM UTC-6, gggg...@gmail.com wrote: >> https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health > And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest. How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare? |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Nov 21 08:54AM -0800 On Thursday, November 21, 2019 at 8:55:00 AM UTC-6, Bob F wrote: > >> https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/471344-poll-majority-of-voters-say-they-would-pay-more-taxes-for-universal-health > > And we ALL know those polls are never slanted and 100% truthful and honest. > How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare? None. They hate the thought of getting older and having to use any type of medical insurance but I've not heard one say they hate having Medicare. |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 21 04:17PM -0800 On 11/21/2019 8:54 AM, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote: >> How many seniors do you know who hate having medicare? > None. They hate the thought of getting older and having to use any type > of medical insurance but I've not heard one say they hate having Medicare. IT turn out, when people don't have to worry about cost every time they go to the doctor, they are happier. And healthier. and live longer and better. And cost a lot less to keep healthy. That's why the rest of the industrialized world is healthier, happier, live longer, have lower infant mortality. And spend 1/2 as much as we do. Ignore the never-ending lies about how they hate their "medicare for all". Few of them would not immediately condemn any effort to convert to our stupid expensive system. People in UK demonstrated immediately when trump suggested that they should change to our system. |
| "catalpa" <catalpa@entertab.org>: Nov 18 09:19PM -0500 <ggggg9271@gmail.com> wrote in message news:4dc31fa8-a649-4cbd-bc55-fb4fd563ec29@googlegroups.com... > https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2019-11-11-cities-ban-natural-gas-to-fight-climate-change And how does banning the cheapest energy available help low income people already suffering with income equality? This nonsense is the backdoor antifracking movement. |
| John Weiss <jrweiss98155@comcast.net>: Nov 16 07:35AM -0800 On 11/16/2019 06:55, Bob F wrote: >> Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing >> a couple weeks ago... > Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem. First, define the problem. Then assess how much people are willing to sacrifice to solve the problem. It is clear to me that the underlying problem is that we have expanded the world population too much to be sustainable at this level, much less any constantly-increasing level above current. My plan is to cut the number of children being born so the world population will shrink to a level that is sustainable. Restrictions on the number of children a couple can have was tried in China, and worked to some extent, but was deemed socially unacceptable. As for the specific issue of natural gas, banning its use is NOT a solution at all! Replacing all that gas use with electricity means electric production will have to be significantly increased. In the near term, until wind & solar with adequate storage is practical on that scale, additional electric production will be via burning natural gas. A gas furnace in the home is 95-98% efficient. Producing electricity from natural gas is AT BEST 50% efficient. So banning home use will actually increase consumption! |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 16 06:55AM -0800 On 11/15/2019 10:24 PM, John Weiss wrote: >> I knew it had to be California. The land of loony people. > Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing a > couple weeks ago... Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem. |
| The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Nov 16 08:40AM -0800 On 11/16/2019 06:55 AM, Bob F wrote: >> Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing a >> couple weeks ago... > Well genius, do give us your plan to solve the problem. Perhaps change the way the sun works. Altering the laws of physics might also be helpful. Easiest, although less possible, would be slapping some common sense into a lot of people. -- Cheers, Bev "You won't like me when I'm angry because I always back up my rage with facts and documented sources." - The Credible Hulk |
| John Weiss <jrweiss98155@comcast.net>: Nov 15 10:24PM -0800 On 11/15/2019 15:18, ItsJoan NotJoann wrote: >> https://weather.com/science/environment/news/2019-11-11-cities-ban-natural-gas-to-fight-climate-change > I read this garbage the other day and before I even started wasting my time > I knew it had to be California. The land of loony people. Seattle is just as bad these days. The mayor proposed the same thing a couple weeks ago... |
| GLOBE CRACKER ADMIN <WEHACKYOURWIFI@GLOBE.COM>: Nov 15 11:27PM Get globe wifi and have your connection hacked by their bullshit modems/dns filtering. crap,crap,crap. I am getting wifi nearly for free. I would NEVER pay Globe for internet. Try PLDT fiber MUCH better. |
| Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com>: Nov 18 09:36PM -0800 On 11/18/2019 5:59 AM, Whoey Louie wrote: > And if it's the AOA are they used on other planes? Does the company > that makes them have similar designs in other planes that could fail > in a similar way? As I said before, the corporate structure run by bean counters has destroyed the engineering quality. Ahhh, the wonders of capitalism!! |
| rbowman <bowman@montana.com>: Nov 18 07:28PM -0700 On 11/18/2019 07:10 PM, catalpa wrote: > The last thing I want is a blanket that weighs more. > As weighted blankets exist, do weightless blankets exist? Or do I just crank > up the heat so I don't need a blanket? I thought a weighted blanket was something you wrapped your wife in before you threw her in the lake. |
| "catalpa" <catalpa@entertab.org>: Nov 18 09:10PM -0500 <ggggg9271@gmail.com> wrote in message news:13f5c670-10b8-4e1a-92b1-4a97e0e3c89a@googlegroups.com... > https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbes-finds/2019/02/09/everything-you-need-to-know-before-buying-a-weighted-blanket/#1d1edcf36b07 The things that exist that I would never think of. The last thing I want is a blanket that weighs more. As weighted blankets exist, do weightless blankets exist? Or do I just crank up the heat so I don't need a blanket? |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
