http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* It's all falling apart, isn't it? - 11 messages, 7 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/aaee75672b67549f?hl=en
* Does Anyone Ever See Club Soda / Seltzer in Cans Anymore ? - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c64d337dfa96e153?hl=en
* The Yid - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/0f5d2ea174ff4ffb?hl=en
* FDA's peanut butter recall widget - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/27559b5fa01ecabe?hl=en
* Time to lock some people up NOW! Peanut Corporation KNEW their product was
tainted before shipping it! - 2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/eca9e4a3d413c2d3?hl=en
* Gas Prices, been creeping up for awhile. WHY? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/fdaf8e0c99a08219?hl=en
* Oil Prices Down but Gas Prices Up ! - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e844507e22b0cdc6?hl=en
* Hard boiled eggs. - 5 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/032a3102de8f165d?hl=en
* 2 for 1 Printer Cartridge Refills at Walgreen's - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/dccc4d5dc3dd25c8?hl=en
* Reservatrol: Worth trying for good health? - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/d9a1173225c8d3d2?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: It's all falling apart, isn't it?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/aaee75672b67549f?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 9:43 am
From: The Real Bev
Dave wrote:
> "William Boyd" <williamboyd@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>>>> attention.
>>>
>>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. At last
>>> REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. But the formula was
>>> changed/fudged so that it no longer included discouraged workers. In
>>> other words, if this was say, 1968, the REPORTED unemployment level would
>>> be about 22%.
>>>
>> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>>
>> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>>
>> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>
> and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? The number is far
> greater than 7.6% -Dave
Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined. Do government workers
survey the people who exhausted their unemployment? Perhaps this is a good job
for the people who have exhausted their unemployment...
--
Cheers, Bev
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"I can't stand this proliferation of paperwork. It's useless to
fight the forms. You've got to kill the people producing them."
-- Vladimir Kabaidze
== 2 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:05 am
From: freeisbest
On Feb 13, 12:43 pm, The Real Bev <bashley...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dave wrote:
> > "William Boyd" <williamb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dave wrote:
> >>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
> >>>> attention.
>
> >>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. At last
> >>> REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. But the formula was
> >>> changed/fudged so that it no longer included discouraged workers. In
> >>> other words, if this was say, 1968, the REPORTED unemployment level would
> >>> be about 22%.
>
> >> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>
> >>http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>
> >> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>
> > and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? The
number
> > is far greater than 7.6% -Dave
>
> Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined. Do government
> workers survey the people who exhausted their unemployment?
> Perhaps this is a good job for the people who have exhausted
> their unemployment...
The last time the Bush admin 'adjusted' the figures, they
emphatically did not count the people are no longer collecting
unemployment. The only thing that matters to a Repub administration
is whether or not their money (i.e., the money we used to think of as
the U.S. Treasury) is being wasted on 'welfare'.
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> "I can't stand this proliferation of paperwork. It's useless to
> fight the forms. You've got to kill the people producing them."
> -- Vladimir Kabaidze
Oh sure, now he tells us.
== 3 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:32 am
From: Lawyerkill
On Feb 13, 1:05�pm, freeisbest <demeter547op...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Feb 13, 12:43�pm, The Real Bev <bashley...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dave wrote:
> > > "William Boyd" <williamb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Dave wrote:
> > >>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
> > >>>> attention.
>
> > >>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. �At last
> > >>> REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. �But the formula was
> > >>> changed/fudged so that it no longer included discouraged workers. �In
> > >>> other words, if this was say, 1968, the REPORTED unemployment level would
> > >>> be about 22%.
>
> > >> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>
> > >>http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>
> > >> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>
> �> > and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? �The
> number
> �> > is far greater than 7.6% �-Dave
>
> �> Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined. �Do government
> �> �workers survey the people who exhausted their unemployment?
> �>�Perhaps this is a good job for the people who have exhausted
> �> their unemployment...
>
> � � The last time the Bush admin 'adjusted' the figures, they
> emphatically did not count the people are no longer collecting
> unemployment. �The only thing that matters to a Repub administration
> is whether or not their money (i.e., the money we used to think of as
> the U.S. Treasury) is being wasted on 'welfare'.
According to former Labor Secretary Bob Reich unemployment was
redefined to eliminate five million discouraged workers and to lower
the unemployment rate
>
> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>
> �> "I can't stand this proliferation of paperwork. � It's useless to
> �> � fight the forms. �You've got to kill the people producing them."
> �> � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � -- Vladimir Kabaidze
>
> � � Oh sure, now he tells us.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
== 4 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:11 am
From: "Rod Speed"
wismel@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 23:45:15 -0500, Test User <Test@NosSpam.net>
> wrote:
>
>> It's all falling apart, isn't it?
>> I've been taking a look at the big picture again lately and forgive
>> me if I speak the obvious but, it's all falling apart. America. It's
>> falling apart.
>>
>> We have Ivy League Schools whose graduates are dumber than sand. Need
>> proof? Look at the financial debacle. These Ivy League Bankers,
>> Brokers and Money Managers were too friggin stupid to figure out
>> they were running themselves into bankruptcy!
>>
>> Many of today's American businessmen who aren't outright stupid, are
>> turning out to be sociopaths; brazenly robbing, defrauding and
>> scamming anyone they can. Take the head of AIG for example; such a
>> schemer that he wrecked his company by intentionally doing business
>> in such a way as to make bigger bonuses for himself. Same thing with
>> the top guys in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
>>
>> These guys ran their companies right into Bankruptcy just to enrich
>> themselves.
>>
>> American public school kids are graduating high schools and even
>> colleges so dumb that most of them cannot find their own home states
>> on an unlabeled map! A whole slew of them can't do basic calculus
>> and their ability to spell or think critically is virtually
>> non-existent.
>>
>> We have a government that is spending so much money there isn't
>> enough on the entire planet to lend to them, so they have to print
>> their own just to keep pace. That can't last much longer.
>>
>> We have millions of diseased, uneducated illegal aliens in the
>> country who have brought with them their filthy, third-world
>> cultures. These pieces of human filth have caused resurgence in
>> diseases like polio, long cured from this land!
>>
>> We treat homosexuals like they're some sort of gift instead of a
>> plague; and in some places, the boards of education are unleashing
>> these sodomites on young school children to "teach them" about the
>> so-called "alternative lifestyle."
>>
>> If you dare speak out about this stuff, you're smeared as a 'hater"
>> or racist, bigot, homophobe or some other such thing.
>>
>> Things are so bad on so many levels that I no longer recognize my own
>> country. Somethings gotta give. This cannot go on.
>
> Perhaps when the unemployment rate hits 10% we might get a rise
> from the general public. It will take a radical rebuild of America
> whose demographics are declining from a qualitative standpoint.
> (90% White, 1970, 69% White, 2008)
Thats because fools like you spend too much time with your dick
in your hand and not enough time with your dick in a woman, stupid.
== 5 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:14 am
From: "fang"
Dave wrote:
> "William Boyd" <williamboyd@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:49957037$1@news.x-privat.org...
>> Dave wrote:
>>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>>>> attention.
>>>
>>>
>>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. At last
>>> REPORT
>>> (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. But the formula was
>>> changed/fudged so
>>> that it no longer included discouraged workers. In other words, if
>>> this was
>>> say, 1968, the REPORTED unemployment level would be about 22%. -Dave
>> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>>
>> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>>
>> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>
> and when those statistics add in discouraged workers?
Those aint the unemployed, those are the discouraged. We have different words for a reason, stupid.
> The number is far greater than 7.6%
== 6 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:17 am
From: "Rod Speed"
The Real Bev wrote:
> Dave wrote:
>
>> "William Boyd" <williamboyd@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>>>>> attention.
>>>>
>>>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. At last
>>>> REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. But the formula was
>>>> changed/fudged so that it no longer included discouraged workers. In other words, if this was say, 1968, the
>>>> REPORTED unemployment
>>>> level would be about 22%.
>>>>
>>> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>>>
>>> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>>>
>>> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>>
>> and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? The number is far greater than 7.6%
> Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
> Do government workers survey the people who exhausted their unemployment?
Yep.
> Perhaps this is a good job for the people who have exhausted their unemployment...
Nope, they have those they use for that already.
== 7 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:18 am
From: "Rod Speed"
freeisbest wrote:
> On Feb 13, 12:43 pm, The Real Bev <bashley...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dave wrote:
>>> "William Boyd" <williamb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Dave wrote:
>>>>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>>>>>> attention.
>>
>>>>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. At last
>>>>> REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. But the formula was
>>>>> changed/fudged so that it no longer included discouraged workers.
>>>>> In other words, if this was say, 1968, the REPORTED unemployment
>>>>> level would be about 22%.
>>
>>>> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>>
>>>> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>>
>>>> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>>
> > > and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? The
> number
> > > is far greater than 7.6% -Dave
>>
> > Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined. Do government
> > workers survey the people who exhausted their unemployment?
> > Perhaps this is a good job for the people who have exhausted
> > their unemployment...
> The last time the Bush admin 'adjusted' the figures, they emphatically
> did not count the people are no longer collecting unemployment.
Bare faced lie.
http://www.bls.gov/cps/cps_htgm.htm
> The only thing that matters to a Repub administration is
> whether or not their money (i.e., the money we used to
> think of as the U.S. Treasury) is being wasted on 'welfare'.
Another bare faced lie.
== 8 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:19 am
From: "Rod Speed"
Lawyerkill wrote:
> On Feb 13, 1:05?pm, freeisbest <demeter547op...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 13, 12:43?pm, The Real Bev <bashley...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Dave wrote:
>>>> "William Boyd" <williamb...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Dave wrote:
>>>>>>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>>>>>>> attention.
>>
>>>>>> The unemployment rate is over 20% right now, in the U.S.A. ?At
>>>>>> last REPORT (that I heard anyway) it was near 7%. ?But the
>>>>>> formula was changed/fudged so that it no longer included
>>>>>> discouraged workers. ?In other words, if this was say, 1968, the
>>>>>> REPORTED unemployment level would be about 22%.
>>
>>>>> OK Chicken Little why don't you use the statistics.
>>
>>>>> http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09037/947350-100.stm
>>
>>>>> U.S. unemployment rate hits 7.6 percent
>>
>> ?> > and when those statistics add in discouraged workers? ?The
>> number
>> ?> > is far greater than 7.6% ?-Dave
>>
>> ?> Clearly, but I wonder how that number is determined. ?Do
>> government ?> ?workers survey the people who exhausted their
>> unemployment? ?>?Perhaps this is a good job for the people who have
>> exhausted
>> ?> their unemployment...
>>
>> ? ? The last time the Bush admin 'adjusted' the figures, they
>> emphatically did not count the people are no longer collecting
>> unemployment. ?The only thing that matters to a Repub administration
>> is whether or not their money (i.e., the money we used to think of as
>> the U.S. Treasury) is being wasted on 'welfare'.
> According to former Labor Secretary Bob Reich unemployment was
> redefined to eliminate five million discouraged workers and to lower
> the unemployment rate
Another bare faced lie.
== 9 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:22 am
From: "Rod Speed"
Day Brown wrote
> wismel wrote
>> When the unemployment rate gets to 10% it should get America's
>> attention. Yes, America is in decline via dilution of it's european
>> population. (yes, means White!)
> Where do we get reliable relevant data?
http://www.bls.gov/webapps/legacy/cpsatab12.htm
> The per capita carbon footprint does not seem
> affordable on incomes in the face of global competition.
Oh bullshit.
> Any effort to drive wages up, drives jobs away or outsourced.
Tell that to the execs and CEOs that have got those bonuses.
> The alternative is to adapt the lifestyle to the level of sustainable,
> competitive wage levels. Thus, some move back in with parents.
> Others move in with other adults in communal housing, to quit
> buying room board, and utilities retail, and move up to wholesale.
And anyone with a clue bought the house they live in long ago.
== 10 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 11:58 am
From: "Dave"
>> and when those statistics add in discouraged workers?
>
> Those aint the unemployed, those are the discouraged. We have different
> words for a reason, stupid.
>
People who want to work but can't find a job. Much of them are called
unemployed. Many more are called discouraged. It is semantics only. The
only "stupid" thing about it is that some people claim that they aren't all
unemployed. You've been duped. -Dave
== 11 of 11 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:56 pm
From: clams_casino
Dave wrote:
>
>>> and when those statistics add in discouraged workers?
>>
>>
>> Those aint the unemployed, those are the discouraged. We have
>> different words for a reason, stupid.
>>
>
> People who want to work but can't find a job. Much of them are called
> unemployed. Many more are called discouraged. It is semantics only.
> The only "stupid" thing about it is that some people claim that they
> aren't all unemployed. You've been duped. -Dave
If I understand it correctly, those who have exceeded their
unemployment comp are no longer included in the unemployment (as with
spouses that may have quit work, but now want / are in need of work.
I believe the 7% only includes those currently collecting unemployment.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Does Anyone Ever See Club Soda / Seltzer in Cans Anymore ?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/c64d337dfa96e153?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:43 am
From: Jeffy3
On Feb 13, 8:27 am, SMS <scharf.ste...@geemail.com> wrote:
> Jeffy3 wrote:
> > The large plastic bottles can usually be found on sale but once you
> > open them they go flat and we don't use it all in one day. The little
> > glass six or eight packs are always a rip off. Would be nice if could
> > find it in 12 oz cans even if its generic no-name soda like you can
> > find in supermarkets.
>
> IIRC, Whole Foods has it in their 365 brand, $2.29 for six cans. It may
> be in the water or mixers section, not in the soda section.
>
> You're right, those small bottles of Schwepps or Canada Dry are a big
> rip off.
>
> Whole Foods also sells very good tonic water, one of the only ones on
> the market with real sugar and not HFCS (the other one is a very high
> priced brand I saw at Cost Plus World Market).
Thank you all. I am in the Philadelphia area, and will definitely run
over to the nearest ShopRite.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Yid
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/0f5d2ea174ff4ffb?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 10:57 am
From: hpope@lycos.com
On Feb 12, 1:29 pm, Igor <i...@yids.suck> wrote:
> When the correlation of forces slides in China's favor, the yids will
> show up at the great wall: "We were selling you defense technology
> back in the nineties. And there's much more we can do for you, if
> you'll let us in." The jew has no home save the wallet of the unwary.
>
> Jews have a right to exist as a separate and distinct genome and
> culture, whereas you have the right to...marry your daughter off to a
> Negro. Don't like it? They don't care. They only care about what you
> do toward toppling them. The rest is the snarls of a caged lion.
>
> The way to rebut charges of anti-Semitism is to say "Yeah, so what?
> You're a jew."
>
> Don't make a noise. Don't scratch the walls. Put the garbage in the
> can. Not next to the can, not on the can, but in the can. Oh -- if the
> Arabs come? Save us........ Jews -- ya gotta love 'em!
>
> Jews are the people who encourage their daughter to marry a jew, and
> your daughter to marry a nigger.
>
> The same government that will not shut down the border is the same
> government demanding that the sons of the race that created America
> turn over ever larger shares of its money to further the education of
> subhumans that don't belong here in the first place, and are here
> solely because of the jews who control our government and our media.
> Tax the goddam shuls. Let the fucking jew billionaires and holocaust
> crybabies pay for these shitskins. Shake Big Hymie until it squeals
> and nickels pour out of its nose like a liberated pinata.
>
I apologize for some of language in the post but it raises many
questions
worth considering.
mitch
==============================================================================
TOPIC: FDA's peanut butter recall widget
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/27559b5fa01ecabe?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:11 pm
From: skulluton@live.com
http://consumerist.com/5150541/search-for-all-recalled-peanut-butter-products-with-this-widget
Yes, it really is this serious.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Time to lock some people up NOW! Peanut Corporation KNEW their product
was tainted before shipping it!
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/eca9e4a3d413c2d3?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:13 pm
From: skulluton@live.com
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/01/28/salmonella.outbreak/
This was nothing short of MURDER
== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:06 pm
From: SMS
skulluton@live.com wrote:
> http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/01/28/salmonella.outbreak/
>
> This was nothing short of MURDER
We can take a lesson from China, and simply execute these people.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Gas Prices, been creeping up for awhile. WHY?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/fdaf8e0c99a08219?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:20 pm
From: "John A. Weeks III"
In article
<c3f8a070-2556-412e-a9e9-e446469f5bc9@k19g2000yqg.googlegroups.com>,
Noveau67@aol.com wrote:
> An article on Yahoo Finance said the refiners were REDUCING the
> amount of gas they make in order to get the prices up. The oil
> companies act together like a cartel.
Of course they don't. They act like human beings. When the
price of your widgets go down by 50%, what incentive do you
have to keep cranking them out? Same with petro--the price
is way down, so supply is naturally going to drop off a bit.
-john-
--
======================================================================
John A. Weeks III 612-720-2854 john@johnweeks.com
Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com
======================================================================
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Oil Prices Down but Gas Prices Up !
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/e844507e22b0cdc6?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:21 pm
From: "John A. Weeks III"
In article
<56a093f7-67ef-4e55-97ae-eb489bc69a74@s20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Noveau67@aol.com wrote:
> Well, it was nice to see gas plummet down to $1.57. The "pump and
> dump" folks on Wall Street made their money on the up tick, and also
> on the down tick, via shorting, and knowing in advance when to short
> it, of course.
You forgot to tell us how capitalism is bad and why you prefer
communism or totalitarian systems of government.
-john-
--
======================================================================
John A. Weeks III 612-720-2854 john@johnweeks.com
Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com
======================================================================
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Hard boiled eggs.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/032a3102de8f165d?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 12:59 pm
From: James
My local Safeway has large eggs on sale this week for 99 cents a
dozen.
If I cook a bunch of hard boiled eggs would they keep in their shells
at room temperature? I don't have room in the fridge.
== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:11 pm
From: "John A. Weeks III"
In article
<751b76a5-ac27-493b-9498-3f0d8486440b@e6g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
James <j0069bond@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My local Safeway has large eggs on sale this week for 99 cents a
> dozen.
>
> If I cook a bunch of hard boiled eggs would they keep in their shells
> at room temperature? I don't have room in the fridge.
No. In fact, hard boiled eggs can spoil more quickly than
raw eggs.
-john-
--
======================================================================
John A. Weeks III 612-720-2854 john@johnweeks.com
Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com
======================================================================
== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:15 pm
From: "brooklyn1"
"James" <j0069bond@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My local Safeway has large eggs on sale this week for 99 cents a
> dozen.
>
> If I cook a bunch of hard boiled eggs would they keep in their shells
> at room temperature? I don't have room in the fridge.
Once cooked in the shell eggs need to be kept refrigerated, and for like no
more than 3-4 days... but if pickled they don't need refrigeration and will
keep at room temperature for like 2-3 months. Pickled eggs are very good so
long as you sleep alone.
== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:24 pm
From: Evelyn Leeper
James wrote:
> My local Safeway has large eggs on sale this week for 99 cents a
> dozen.
>
> If I cook a bunch of hard boiled eggs would they keep in their shells
> at room temperature? I don't have room in the fridge.
Bear in mind that if you hard-boil them, then you can pile them all in a
vertical container that takes a lot less space than an egg carton.
--
Evelyn C. Leeper
I know you can't live on hope alone but without hope
life is not worth living. -Harvey Milk
== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:48 pm
From: Nancy2
On Feb 13, 2:59 pm, James <j0069b...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> My local Safeway has large eggs on sale this week for 99 cents a
> dozen.
>
> If I cook a bunch of hard boiled eggs would they keep in their shells
> at room temperature? I don't have room in the fridge.
Leave them raw in the shell up to 6 weeks in the fridge only. Cooked
only last about 3 days. Eggs are cheap, anyway, so why bother to
"stock up?"
N.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 2 for 1 Printer Cartridge Refills at Walgreen's
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/dccc4d5dc3dd25c8?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:43 pm
From: albundy2@mailinator.com
On Feb 13, 11:37 am, SMS <scharf.ste...@geemail.com> wrote:
> Color, 2/$15.14
> Black, 2/$10.14
>
> I had some refilled yesterday and they seem to work fine. Twice before I
> brought in cartridges that they were unable to refill for whatever
> reason, so I brought those to Cartridge World.
Good price, depending on how much ink they hold. Last time I checked,
Walgreen was excluding the big HP carts that I use. The #45 holds 42
mls of ink. Oh, now I recall that they were refilling some and short
filling them.
There are some quirks in the refilling process that can cause them not
to work. The itinerant help they may have might not be up on them. At
least they were honest and did not give you a dud back.
Ink is cheap. One can afford to practice and get the process down on
the carts you use. Then you never have to leave home for ink.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Reservatrol: Worth trying for good health?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/d9a1173225c8d3d2?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Feb 13 2009 1:44 pm
From: me@privacy.net
been reading abt the health bennies of Reservatrol
which cna be bought at Sam's Wholesale
anyone trying it out and have good luck with it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reservatrol
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/25/60minutes/main4752082.shtml
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment