Frugal Living: misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 8 topics

Saturday, June 5, 2010

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

misc.consumers.frugal-living
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

==============================================================================
TOPIC: AF men and women coat made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/ddb8dd637611f7c0?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jun 4 2010 11:02 pm
From: cntrade09

adidas 35th anniversary shoes made in china (http://
www.cntrade09.com )
adicolor shoes made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
adidas football shoes made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
GGG hoody made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
GGG T-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
Armani T-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
Armani shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
armani long t-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
AF sweater made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
AF women trousrs made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
AF men and women coat made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
D&G jeans made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
A&G T-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
BBC scanties made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
BBC jeans made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
BBC hoody made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
BBC T-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
LRG jeans made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
LRG hoody made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
LRG T-shirt made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
Bape jeans made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )
Bape hoody made in china (http://www.cntrade09.com )

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Freezer question, your experience.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/6c40f512af1456d1?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 2:01 am
From: no-spam@sonic.net (Fake ID)

In article <xbppojq35yx$.dlg@sqwertz.com>,
Sqwertz <swertz@cluemail.compost> wrote:
>On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 17:20:17 +0100, john hamilton wrote:
>
>> We need to buy a freezer. The *chest* type is what we want with the lid on
>> the top.
>
>Why do people prefer chest freezers? Uprights take up less floor
>space (you can't stack stuff on top of your chest freezer), and
>with a moderately full freezer, you have remove a bunch of stuff
>to get what you're looking for - even if you can find it at all.

Since I was in Big Box today I took a look at the freezers (I suspect
mine is the source of a abrupt spike in electric usage). After seeing
the upright models it occurred to me that when a check freezer is full,
it's *really* full because all the crap is a big pile, while a full
upright will still have air because the contents are unlikely exactly
match the shelf spacing.

The comments about how the air spills out of an upright had me wondering
whether the [closed] door and its gasket insulates as well as a solid
wall.

== 2 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 11:12 am
From: "Rod Speed"

Fake ID wrote
> Sqwertz <swertz@cluemail.compost> wrote
>> john hamilton wrote

>>> We need to buy a freezer. The *chest* type is what we want with the lid on the top.

>> Why do people prefer chest freezers? Uprights take up less floor
>> space (you can't stack stuff on top of your chest freezer), and
>> with a moderately full freezer, you have remove a bunch of stuff
>> to get what you're looking for - even if you can find it at all.

> Since I was in Big Box today I took a look at the freezers (I
> suspect mine is the source of a abrupt spike in electric usage).

Whats its efficiency rating ?

> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
> a check freezer is full, it's *really* full because all the crap is
> a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because the
> contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.

Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.

> The comments about how the air spills out of an upright had me wondering
> whether the [closed] door and its gasket insulates as well as a solid wall.

Yes it does if its well designed and the gasket is replaced when it starts to leak.

== 3 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 11:32 am
From: "dennis@home"

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:86vicvFj79U1@mid.individual.net...

> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.

It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is replaced by
nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.
If you don't open the door it makes no difference.

== 4 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 1:28 pm
From: "Rod Speed"

dennis@home wrote:
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
>>> a check freezer is full, it's really full because all the crap is
>>> a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because the
>>> contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.

>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.

> It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is replaced by nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.

In practice thats a trivial effect because the specific gravity of the air is so low.

You get a much bigger effect when you add new stuff to the freezer.

> If you don't open the door it makes no difference.

So his original makes no sense.

== 5 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 1:52 pm
From: "dennis@home"

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:86vqb8FfnU1@mid.individual.net...
> dennis@home wrote:
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
>>>> a check freezer is full, it's really full because all the crap is
>>>> a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because the
>>>> contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.
>
>>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.
>
>> It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is replaced
>> by nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.
>
> In practice thats a trivial effect because the specific gravity of the air
> is so low.

Its that low that it ices up your freezer.

== 6 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 2:17 pm
From: "Rod Speed"

dennis@home wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> dennis@home wrote:
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
>>>>> a check freezer is full, it's really full because all the crap is
>>>>> a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because the
>>>>> contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.

>>>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.

>>> It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is
>>> replaced by nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.

>> In practice thats a trivial effect because the specific gravity of the air is so low.

> Its that low that it ices up your freezer.

Nope, that mostly comes from what is in the freezer and happens in chest freezers anyway.

== 7 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 2:44 pm
From: "dennis@home"

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:86vt6pFgi7U1@mid.individual.net...
> dennis@home wrote
>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>
>>>>>> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
>>>>>> a check freezer is full, it's really full because all the crap is
>>>>>> a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because the
>>>>>> contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.
>
>>>>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the
>>>>> freezer.
>
>>>> It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is
>>>> replaced by nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.
>
>>> In practice thats a trivial effect because the specific gravity of the
>>> air is so low.
>
>> Its that low that it ices up your freezer.
>
> Nope, that mostly comes from what is in the freezer and happens in chest
> freezers anyway.

It happens faster in uprights.
If it came from the contents they would all suffer from freezer burn big
time and freezers would be useless for storing food.

== 8 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 6:53 pm
From: spambait@milmac.com (Doug Miller)

In article <hue57r$p6i$1@news.datemas.de>, "dennis@home" <dennis@killspam.kicks-ass.net> wrote:
>
>
>"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:86vicvFj79U1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.
>
>It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is replaced by
>nice warm moist air that has to be cooled.

Do you *really* think that the entry of a few ounces of room-temperature air
makes a measurable difference in the temperature of several hundred pounds of
frozen food?

== 9 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:37 pm
From: "Rod Speed"

dennis@home wrote
> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>> dennis@home wrote
>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote
>>>> dennis@home wrote:
>>>>> Rod Speed <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote

>>>>>>> After seeing the upright models it occurred to me that when
>>>>>>> a check freezer is full, it's really full because all the crap
>>>>>>> is a big pile, while a full upright will still have air because
>>>>>>> the contents are unlikely exactly match the shelf spacing.

>>>>>> Yes, but that air makes no difference to the effeciency of the freezer.

>>>>> It does when you open the door, that free air leaks out and is replaced by nice warm moist air that has to be
>>>>> cooled.

>>>> In practice thats a trivial effect because the specific gravity of the air is so low.

>>> Its that low that it ices up your freezer.

>> Nope, that mostly comes from what is in the freezer and happens in chest freezers anyway.

> It happens faster in uprights.

Not with the frost free ones it doesnt.

> If it came from the contents they would all suffer from freezer burn big time and freezers would be useless for
> storing food.

Wrong, as always.

== 10 of 10 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 10:53 pm
From: atec7 7 <""atec77\"@ hotmail.com">

Rod Speed wrote:

>>> Nope, that mostly comes from what is in the freezer and happens in chest freezers anyway.
>
>> It happens faster in uprights.
>
> Not with the frost free ones it doesnt.

Experience tells me as usual you are wrong woddles

>
>> If it came from the contents they would all suffer from freezer burn big time and freezers would be useless for
>> storing food.
>
> Wrong, as always.

As usual you couldn't bullshite your was out of a wet paper nag
>
>

==============================================================================
TOPIC: It's no secret the Christians keep us in a nice cage... but we need
SPACE
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/67b52dce35fe9195?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 7:32 am
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"

You are forced to be in a cage, WITH ALL THE CREATURE COMFORTS, afraid
to ride a bike or even walk around, and then you must get on another
cage and drive everywhere, where you too become part of the problem.
Hey, WE NEED SPACE, you know what I mean? SPACE, SPACE, SPACE...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3AAdkfiamU&feature=related

---------------------------------------------------

THE WISE TIBETAN MONKEY SAYS

"Creature comforts suck, get on a hammock under a real tree"

http://webspawner.com/users/BIKEFORPEACE (plan A)

http://webspawner.com/users/MASTURBATIONFORPEACE (plan B)

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:46 am
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"

On Jun 5, 12:24 pm, Kevin <barry196...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Jun 3, 9:50 pm, "The BORG" <b...@gone.com> wrote:

> > The style of humour used today was WRY.

> > Did you spot this?

> Used by who? I live in a world where defacating on a person's
> doorstep is reckoned to be funny (as in amusing).

Meaning: 1. Twisted, crooked or bent, as a wry face. 2. Humorous with
a clever twist, as a wry wit.

This qualifies as wry humor?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ-sBf7laMM

--------------------------------------------------------

http://webspawner.com/users/MASTURBATIONFORPEACE (plan B)

==============================================================================
TOPIC: The Big Short, inside the doomsday machine.
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/7a5ccd8e6ccb4bc4?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 1:12 pm
From: brad herschel

As an inside look at the machinations of Wall Street, it is
unsurpassed. For anyone with more than a couple of bucks in the
market, it is a must read.

Some Highlights:

The market is always right. Wrong. Here is a fine example that it's
quite possible for every major institution on Wall Street to be wrong.

No one would demolish the system on which our way of life is based in
order to make an extra buck. Wrong. The sheer numbers of Wall Street
residents who were ready, willing and able to take the system down
will make you want to blow chunks. It was as if anyone capable of a
crisis of conscience was weeded out of every Wall Street firm.

Until I read this, I assumed that there were a number of amoral people
working on the Street but at least a significant minority of the
honest and upright. This book documents the overwhelming presence of
greed and corruption in the fabric of Wall Street.

Wall Street firms are shrewd assessors of risk. Wrong. This book
documents the fact that not some but all of the big Wall Street firms
miscalculated the risks associated with subprime loans and subjected
the firms to hugely excessive risks. In most instances the CEOs were
the most clueless about what was happening within their own
organizations. Without the assistance of the federal government, all
of the major Wall Street firms would have gone into bankruptcy. All of
them.

At the height of the problem, the major Wall Street firms refused to
let market pricing adjust to economic fundamentals. This clear
illustration of how supply and demand can be subverted by money and
power is perhaps the most damning piece of evidence in regard to how
our financial system is susceptible to manipulation.

The clear conclusion is that it's all about the Benjamins for
practically all of Wall Street. If someone's sister or mother has to
get sold into the sex trade to make a buck, well that's the way it
works. After having almost destroyed our financial system and our way
of life, these people are substantially still in place going about
their business in the same old way. And fighting every attempt to put
in place regulations that would prevent them from trying it again.

One of the other causative factors noted was the public ownership of
some Wall Street firms. The point was made that no privately owned
firm would have ever subjected itself to the risks of 35 to 1
leverage. But to subject shareholders and the country and the system
to the risks of 35 to 1 risk - no problem.

But hey - don't take my word for it. Read it.

cole

==============================================================================
TOPIC: What would Jesus ask a Darwinian? A possible explanation
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/7c02fbcad5311967?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 2:02 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"

On Jun 5, 4:34 pm, "J.H.Boersema" <jo...@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> On 2010-06-05, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-Hammock <comandante.ban...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > (What a stupid question, right? Not so fast, that was posted in
> > another group and I give a possible explanation)
>
> > Jesus would say,
> > "What time is it, pal?"
> > And the Darwinian would ask, "What for?"
> > And Jesus would say,
> > "I have an important dinner tonight."
>
> > And the Darwinian went around his business thinking what a stupid
> > question that was in those times.
>
> > "It's time for REVOLUTION," he added.
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> > WHEN IT IS TIME FOR REVOLUTION
> >http://webspawner.com/users/BANANAREVOLUTION
>
> I suppose it might happen like that, because jesus had nothing more to
> offer then empty whaffle.
>
> When I'm meeting with a Darwinian, which I already tried to also online,
> I tell them: "you missed something, it is called 'technology."
> The Darwinian as a rule doesn't dare to react, so I am assuming the
> Darwining thinks: ``is this discovery going to cost me my tenure,'' or
> unfortunately more likely ``get out of the way you maggot.'' Then I'd
> try again and say: "technology changes who survive for the human
> species, infighting is no longer necessary to outsrip the power of other
> technology-less creatures." If the Darwinian was paying any attention he
> (why is it always a he?) may start to worry about his tenure - for
> failing to miss the obvious. Then I might say: "If you don't persue the
> revolution now, you may very well lose your life together with your
> tenure."
>
> Sadly, nobody seems to realize that it is true, or how serious and
> pressing the situation really is. So, good luck with the 3rd world war
> then, have a blast y'all !
>
> PS, I tried to find out what your Banana-revolution means, but no clear
> idea. Tip: delete your site and pop mine in its place, thanks.
> Maybe something might change, then (ideally for the better).
> --
> _ _ /_\ _ _http://www.SOCIALISM.nlFree markets and democracy,
> \ /v`vvv\ / but now: properly.
> /_\_#_#_/_\
> \ / Day 39 of the revolution.

Very clever thoughts there! It reminds me of these quotations...

"There is no wilderness where I can hide from these things, there is
no haven where I can escape them; though I travel to the ends of the
earth, I find the same accursed system — I find that all the fair and
noble impulses of humanity, the dreams of poets and the agonies of
martyrs, are shackled and bound in the service of organized and
predatory Greed!"

and...

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job
depends on not understanding it."

They are the words of Upton Sinclair in 'The Jungle,' written in 1906.
It seems like not much has change after all. Actually things seem to
have gotten worse ever since that Jesus made it to the Last Supper on
time. We are still waiting for the miracle and the prophet.

Well the predators of the jungle have always known it's all about
PREDATION... so do we.

http://atom.smasher.org/streetparty/?l1=Coming+Soon%3A&l2=the&l3=Banana+Revolution!&l4=

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:27 pm
From: "His Highness the TibetanMonkey, Creator of the Movement of Tantra-
Hammock"

On Jun 5, 11:46 pm, James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote:

> Cities are civilization, more or less. White people build
> cities, black people don't to anything like the same extent -
> observe what happened to Detroit, Leopoldville and Salisbury
> when the blacks took over, and what is happening to
> Johannesburg. They are turning into ghost towns. People
> whose skeletons look like those of white people first
> appeared about ten thousand years ago or so, cities appeared
> about eight thousand years ago. The obvious implication is
> that around eight or ten thousand years ago, some humans
> evolved into city building creatures, civilization building
> creatures - that Darwinian evolution first created civilization
> building creatures ten thousand years ago or so.
>
> Civilizations started to be built about as soon as the first
> race that builds civilizations showed up.

The little Indians of South America with their great civilizations
seem to challenge to a great degree your white supremacy theory.

Germans destroyed themselves for no reason other than to rebuild
themselves and prove their superiority once again. ;)

On the other hand Rome had a great civilization that was as Barbaric
as the Barbarians, so everything is relative.

The blacks of Africa, probably lived better in tribes than in an urban
center. But our urban centers are starting to look like a jungle, so
the cycle never stops.

And the "successful" alpha males/females in SUVs are killing our
planet. Perhaps we need more losers to ride bikes.

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:48 pm
From: "Rod Speed"

James A. Donald <jam...@echeque.com> wrote

LIke hell they are.

> People whose skeletons look like those of white people
> first appeared about ten thousand years ago or so,
> cities appeared about eight thousand years ago.

But those who built them werent anything like white.

In fact citys came to those who were white MUCH later
than they came to those who were brown or yellow.

> The obvious implication is that around eight or ten
> thousand years ago, some humans> evolved into
> city building creatures, civilization building creatures

Nope, just someone came up with the idea of citys and that idea took off.

> - that Darwinian evolution first created civilization
> building creatures ten thousand years ago or so.

Fraid not, there was fuck all evolution happening at that time.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Yet another spam source
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/0a2c8956e3506738?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 3:44 pm
From: "NancyR"

"The Real Bev" <bashley101@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hu9tig$l20$1@news.eternal-september.org...
> I've recently gotten spam text messages on my pre-paid T-Mobile account,
> which cost me a nickel each. Outrageous. I phoned tech support. The
> first guy was barely able to speak English and hung up on me after 4
> minutes. The second guy was OK and set my account up so that I would NOT
> receive marketing messages.
>
> What a crappy system. You're assumed to WANT to pay for spam unless you
> call and tell them different.
>
> I shouldn't complain, though. It costs me $10/year now and I'll probably
> never use up my minutes. Still...
>

What plan do you have that is $10 a year?

Nancy

==============================================================================
TOPIC: What are currently your best saving tips ?
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/a23335cb8985c73c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 5:43 pm
From: marco polo

.
in the long run,
you are much much better off increasing your income

i know it's less fun, but just think about it:

increase your income, say $1 an hour,
or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
and see what you have at the end of the year,
vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better

marc

== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 8:53 pm
From: "Ed Pawlowski"

"marco polo" <markphd21@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d5334a06-add5-44fd-ad9d-9dee8bce3f3c@x27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> .
> in the long run,
> you are much much better off increasing your income
>
> i know it's less fun, but just think about it:
>
> increase your income, say $1 an hour,
> or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
> and see what you have at the end of the year,
> vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better
>
> marc

Sounds great, but not always easily done. With the present economy,
employers have cut OT, cut wages, cut hours, and much of the side job part
time stuff has dried up. Increasing income may be better, but saving money
is the only way for millions right now.

== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:01 pm
From: Ron

On Jun 5, 8:43 pm, marco polo <markph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> .
> in the long run,
> you are much much better off increasing your income
>
> i know it's less fun, but just think about it:
>
> increase your income, say $1 an hour,
> or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
> and see what you have at the end of the year,
> vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better
>
> marc

Well damn.....I gonna tell my boss Monday that I want a $1.00 an hour
raise...and then next week I'm gonna ask for another $1.00

Get real.

Even if you get a raise, when should you cut back on what saves money?

== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:02 pm
From: Ron

On Jun 5, 11:53 pm, "Ed Pawlowski" <e...@snetnospam.net> wrote:
> "marco polo" <markph...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d5334a06-add5-44fd-ad9d-9dee8bce3f3c@x27g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > .
> > in the long run,
> > you are much much better off increasing your income
>
> > i know it's less fun, but just think about it:
>
> > increase your income, say $1 an hour,
> > or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
> > and see what you have at the end of the year,
> > vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better
>
> > marc
>
> Sounds great, but not always easily done. With the present economy,
> employers have cut OT, cut wages, cut hours, and much of the side job part
> time stuff has dried up. Increasing income may be better, but saving money
> is the only way for millions right now.

IF, you get a raise is no reason to stop doing whatever it is that you
do that saves you money.

== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:42 pm
From: "Rod Speed"

Ed Pawlowski wrote
> marco polo <markphd21@gmail.com> wrote

>> in the long run,
>> you are much much better off increasing your income

>> i know it's less fun, but just think about it:

>> increase your income, say $1 an hour,
>> or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
>> and see what you have at the end of the year,
>> vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better

> Sounds great, but not always easily done.

Easy enough tho.

> With the present economy, employers have cut OT, cut wages, cut hours,

And cant do a damned thing about what you make on the side.

> and much of the side job part time stuff has dried up.

Like hell it has. In many ways that has increased because so many
have binned full time employees and replaced them with part timers.

And anyone with even half a clue can make money on the side independently of any employer anyway.

> Increasing income may be better, but saving money is the only way for millions right now.

Thats just plain wrong.

== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 9:25 pm
From: Coffee's For Closers

In article <d5334a06-add5-44fd-ad9d-
9dee8bce3f3c@x27g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, markphd21@gmail.com
says...

> in the long run,
> you are much much better off increasing your income
>
> i know it's less fun, but just think about it:
>
> increase your income, say $1 an hour,
> or $10 a week, or $25 a month, or whatever,
> and see what you have at the end of the year,
> vs saving $1 here or $5 there, is clearly better

It depends on what you do with the extra money. If you just blow
every dollar as soon as you get it, on random, wasteful stuff,
then it doesn't help.

There are people making $100k/yr and living paycheque to
paycheque, above their means, and loaded with debt. If they lose
their job, they won't even have next month's mortgage money. They
will be lining up at a food bank within weeks.

Whereas there are people with much lower incomes who have a
healthy emergency fund, zero debt, etc.

--
Get Credit Where Credit Is Due
http://www.cardreport.com/
Credit Tools, Reference, and Forum

==============================================================================
TOPIC: blackberry shelf life and recipes
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/t/9d938b13bbd6b22c?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jun 5 2010 8:36 pm
From: Jeff Thies

Bob F wrote:
> Jeff Thies wrote:
>> The nice thing about urban blight and is that it leaves so much
>> ground for blackberries to inhabit. I just picked two quarts of
>> blackberries and since there are many more on the way, I'm thinking of
>> what to do with them.
>>
>> I would think refrigeration would help, should I wash them before?
>>
>> What about freezing?
>>
>> Any simple recipes? Most of my cooking stops at one ingredient, I
>> found this:
>
> Freezing works fine. Spread the just picked berries a few layers deep on cookie
> sheets, and put them in the freezer. When frozen, twist the pans to release them
> from the bottom, and dump them loose into ziploc freezer bags, suck the air out
> and put them back into the freezer. Done this way, you can dump out as many as
> you need.

Thanks, I'm working my way through the berry patch! The freezing is
working well.

Jeff

>
> Try making an apple pie, but sprinkle a layer of blackberries on top before
> adding the top crust. I call it a blappleberry pie.
>
> They are great on waffles, with real maple syrup, and some plain yogurt.
>
>

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "misc.consumers.frugal-living"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.consumers.frugal-living/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

Frugal Living

Blog Archive

Saturday, June 5, 2010

misc.consumers.frugal-living - 25 new messages in 8 topics - digest

No comments: