- Ear plugs that work? - 4 Updates
- 1961 food prices vs. today (for a family with 18 kids) - 2 Updates
| KenK <invalid@invalid.com>: Mar 16 04:45PM ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net> wrote in > Give it about 5 minutes and the earplug will return to its normal size > and fill the ear canal. Ahhh! I'll bet that's my poblem. I'm expecting them to work right away. Thanks much! Ken -- You know it's time to clean the refrigerator when something closes the door from the inside. |
| 21blackswan@gmail.com: Mar 16 01:54PM -0700 I gave up on ear plugs, long ago I use Cotton Balls much more convenient, softer... [or you can try splitting larger cotton balls into two] marc |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Mar 16 06:02PM -0700 On Monday, March 16, 2015 at 11:45:58 AM UTC-5, KenK wrote: > Ahhh! I'll bet that's my poblem. I'm expecting them to work right away. > Thanks much! > Ken You're welcome! |
| ItsJoan NotJoann <itsjoannotjoann@webtv.net>: Mar 16 06:05PM -0700 > much more convenient, softer... > [or you can try splitting larger cotton balls into two] > marc Try the method I described above. |
| trader4@optonline.net: Mar 16 11:06AM -0700 On Friday, March 13, 2015 at 11:43:29 PM UTC-4, Michael Black wrote: > > in the winter was a such a delicacy they were given as gifts for > > Christmas. > I thought seafood was always poor people's food, if you lived by the sea. I guess you don't live by the sea. I'm at the NJ shore and most seafood here has always been a more expensive food source and not poor people's food, unless you catch it yourself. Prices for a piece of fish aren't that much different than if you were in OH. In fact, I've seen some places well inland, when traveling, where fish prices were less than they are here at the coast. > collecting them don't make that much money, the price paid at the > supermarket or restaurant reflect the cost of getting it there fast. > Michael The transportation is a component, but it's not the dominant factor in the price. There are lobster boats right here, but the price isn't cheap and poor people aren't eating them. Even typical average American family obviously finds them pricey, because I don't see folks eating them much. I'd eat them a lot if they were cheap. |
| trader4@optonline.net: Mar 16 11:12AM -0700 On Saturday, March 14, 2015 at 12:25:28 AM UTC-4, The Real Bev wrote: > >> food for New Englanders. > Are you sure you meant NINETEEN61? I don't think lobster has been cheap > food during my lifetime. +1 I do recall it being said that it was poor people's food back in the days of the Pilgrims, but lobster sure wasn't cheap in 1961. > OK, you're definitely not talking about 1961. > -- > Cheers, Bev I don't know what the poster is talking about either. People still send oranges and other fruit as gifts at Xmas. It doesn't have anything to do with them being rare or unusual. And certainly oranges were plentiful in the 1960s. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment