Monday, April 13, 2015

Digest for misc.consumers.frugal-living@googlegroups.com - 3 updates in 1 topic

Michael Black <et472@ncf.ca>: Apr 13 02:24PM -0400

hchickpea@hotmail.com: Apr 13 03:51PM -0500

>Not recently, but maybe some day someone woke up and decided "frugality is
>for losers" and went on a buying binge.
 
> Michael
 
More likely the cost of a newsfeed where Rod was the main poster probably seemed
NOT frugal... :D
The Real Bev <bashley101@gmail.com>: Apr 13 04:23PM -0700


>>>> I'm an oldtimer here, not dead, but not on Facebook either. I've never seen
>>>> anybody with a smartphone on USENET.
>>>> I miss the great threads that used to be here.
 
I'm on facebook, along with a lot of people from other newsgroups. It's
nothing at all like usenet. More pictures, less thinking and
discussion. I've "known" these people since 1995 so perhaps discussion
isn't needed as much -- we all "know" each other.
 
I just spent a week in Brian Head with half a dozen people from the
skiing newsgroup, and I don't think any of us surprised any others of us
-- it's like we'd been friends, or at least work-friends, for quite a
while.
 
Usenet was better, though. Even without the dog/cat pictures.
 
>>> forums and other forms of communication.
 
>>> I think that another part of it was that until 2002, and then 2008, a lot of us
>>> had a lot more positive outlook towards the future.
 
Along the belief that if we could just explain things properly we could
convince the terminally wrong-headed that life would be better if they
could just change their minds and AGREE WITH US.
 
 
>>I wonder if that factored into some of the people lost over the years.
>>Not recently, but maybe some day someone woke up and decided "frugality is
>>for losers" and went on a buying binge.
 
Perhaps if you discovered a terminal illness and thought your heirs
would just waste the fruits of your lifelong frugality you might figure
Oh hell, I'm just going to spend it all, but even then I think we would
tend to want to get the best deal. Barring that, such a polar-opposite
switch just doesn't seem reasonable.
 
> More likely the cost of a newsfeed where Rod was the main poster probably seemed
> NOT frugal... :D
 
Does anybody still pay for this stuff? NOT frugal whether RS exists or not.
 
 
--
Cheers, Bev
---------------------------------------
A recent psychic fair was cancelled due
to unforeseen circumstances.
You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.

No comments: