- Isn't this happening in more and more urban centers? - 4 Updates
- To the Oldies but Goodies - 1 Update
| Beaver_Fever@live.com: Oct 21 11:19PM -0700 > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/19/california-housing-crisis-residents-flee-san-francisco-because-costs/3985196002/ Yes, people who can't afford to live there are replaced by those who can. |
| ggggg9271@gmail.com: Oct 22 09:25AM -0700 > On Saturday, October 19, 2019 at 5:31:35 PM UTC-7, gggg...@gmail.com wrote: > > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/19/california-housing-crisis-residents-flee-san-francisco-because-costs/3985196002/ > Yes, people who can't afford to live there are replaced by those who can. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/affordable-housing-striking-chicago-teachers-demands-191022021827491.html |
| John Weiss <jrweiss98155@comcast.net>: Oct 22 10:21AM -0700 >>> https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/19/california-housing-crisis-residents-flee-san-francisco-because-costs/3985196002/ >> Yes, people who can't afford to live there are replaced by those who can. > https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/affordable-housing-striking-chicago-teachers-demands-191022021827491.html And the politicians who are complaining about the housing crisis are the same ones who gave incentives to companies to relocate there to provide high-paying jobs... AND those same politicians don't have the gonads to force developers to actually include sufficient lower-cost housing in their urban development plans. They will only force the developers to pay an offset fee, which the politicians then waste on other stuff without actually developing any lower-cost housing. AND in the few cases where lower-cost (i.e., subsidized) housing IS developed, the income levels to qualify are either non-existent, not enforced, or too high to allow the target population to get in. |
| "catalpa" <catalpa@entertab.org>: Oct 22 08:29PM -0400 <ggggg9271@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ecc3ba0f-2082-4d82-ac78-6b98d4c56287@googlegroups.com... >> > https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/19/california-housing-crisis-residents-flee-san-francisco-because-costs/3985196002/ >> Yes, people who can't afford to live there are replaced by those who can. > https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/10/affordable-housing-striking-chicago-teachers-demands-191022021827491.html And who is supposed to pay to make housing affordable? Answer: The already overburdened taxpayer. Why is it that groups of people feel entitled to force other people to pay for their endless demands? And the striking Chicago teachers aren't working for starvation wages and benefits. "Meanwhile, taxpayers recognize that Chicago's teacher salaries, the median of which is more than $78,000, are high compared with other big cities, and the school district is on shaky fiscal ground." "Under the current Chicago union contract, beginning teachers make a base salary of just over $56,000 a year, while the most senior teachers with extra credentials make $108,242 a year." |
| ggggg9271@gmail.com: Oct 22 09:15AM -0700 > If you could do it all over again, what would you have done differently? I think I would have gotten a degree in child psychology. Make that a Ph.D. |
| You received this digest because you're subscribed to updates for this group. You can change your settings on the group membership page. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it send an email to misc.consumers.frugal-living+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. |
No comments:
Post a Comment